Relay strange ,

If this is the future matrix we're all a part of, plug me in.

oh, *japan. you've done it again.

Adding video to channels (Asia) - requested by EndAll.

Tags for this video have been changed from 'boobs, butt, bikini, dance, play, water, sleep' to 'boobs, butt, bikini, dance, play, water, sleep, girlfriend sim' - edited by EndAll

Breast physics, soft shadows, hair collisions, just short of recockulous poly count on that model, and... billboard sprites for water splashes? AND I THOUGHT I LOVED HER, IT WAS ALL A LIE!

Everytime I think the Japanese have reached the pinnacles of objectification of women, they soar to new heights.

For a second, I thought this was a new DoA game.

Wii wife-beater on the the horizon.

>> ^longde:
Everytime I think the Japanese have reached the pinnacles of objectification of women, they soar to new heights.


Of note, that isn't a woman. Was the pokey face of mario 64 intro an objectification of superhero plumbers?

Yes!! What they say!!

That is objectification of women, whether or not you agree with it.

There are no superhero plumbers in the real world, unlike women.

I would have totally started with The 3 Stooges routine at the 4:30 mark.

Oh, wise girl, eh? Here! *poke* And take this *stretch* And this! *slap* Wuhp wuhp wuhp!

*wtf is up with the "real" meter in the upper left.

WHAT THE FUCK could that POSSIBLY be MEASURING!?!?

I MUST KNOW!!!!

Adding video to channels (Wtf) - requested by ponceleon.

You laugh now, but over the next 50 years I'm pretty sure that lonely Japanese engineers and computer programmers are going to completely wipe out the market for all forms real life prostitution.

>> ^longde:
That is objectification of women, whether or not you agree with it.
There are no superhero plumbers in the real world, unlike women.


This isn't a real woman, nor is she in a real world. It's a fantasy land of make believe...doesn't objectification have to be of a real object?

u r so 20th century

hahaha, yes, I dialed my phone with sparks...so what?!

>> ^ponceleon:
wtf is up with the "real" meter in the upper left.
WHAT THE FUCK could that POSSIBLY be MEASURING!?!?
I MUST KNOW!!!!


More than likely, just the frames/second. The "Real" thing is probably just an overlay for the demo mode or something. Not that I've played with this particular piece of software or anything...

A new game titled Real Kanojo (Real Girlfriend) is a dating simulator.

The game has the ability to use face tracking technology via a webcam. So when you make motions like nodding "she" can respond to you. It also supports 3D glasses – stereoscopic, red and blue 3D glasses to give the illusion of depth and realism. Which is great because just like my last girlfriend, the 3D glasses are bound to give me a headache after a while. IT'S SO REAL!

Real Girlfriend aims to be the most technologically advanced virtual girlfriend game to date. A title every developer should be striving for. All of the scenes are motion captured, it's compatible with Windows 7, supports wide screen monitors (in case your into big girls, I guess), and multi-core CPUs.

The creators of the game have sadly decided to release the game exclusively in Japan.

Dude, she wont shutup....

I like that when you try to quit the program, she thinks you're breaking up with her. SO..DIFFICULT...TO...LET...GO...

waiting for the massively multiplayer online version

Comment hidden because you are ignoring dag.(show it anyway)

I give it another 10 years before this technology is put into something like a walking RealDoll™ - then prostitution 2.0 begins. Though it won't be considered prostitution until the A.I. rights accord of 2036.

Someone walked into my office as I was watching this. I quickly reached to the bottom-right corner to find the Windows 7 Show Desktop button and disaster was avoided.

What I'm trying to say is *nsfw.

This video has been flagged as being Not Suitable For Work - declared nsfw by demon_ix.

*spoiler alert*

DP at 5'02" !!!

In the secret final level your hands are replaced by tentacles

She may be fake...but I can tell you, those boobs are real.

that's the type of music i listen to

Hahahaha man, those crazy weird japanese people. Notice how every SLIGHTEST movement results in breast jiggling on the kind of scale you'd expect in a high speed collision?

So I take it that's the Uncanny Valley, right there between the two Uncanny Mountains?

3:44 made me laugh.

>> ^GeeSussFreeK:
>> ^longde:
That is objectification of women, whether or not you agree with it.
There are no superhero plumbers in the real world, unlike women.

This isn't a real woman, nor is she in a real world. It's a fantasy land of make believe...doesn't objectification have to be of a real object?


No "to present as an object, esp. of sight, touch, or other physical sense; make objective; externalize.".

It doesn't matter if it's a real woman or not, this is a representation of a woman being presented as nothing but a plaything, and object to be looked at and prodded. This IS objectifying women. It's showing a woman not as a person but as an object... don't try and pretend that it's all fun and games, because really, it's kinda sick.

I personally have no issue with 'sex games' as long as the game doesn't make sex at all costs with no concern for the female character the aim. If it is presented as consensual and the woman is enjoying things too, then that's ok. It's these objectifying and rape type games that freak me out and scare me.

Really, how downtrodden, emasculated and powerless do Japanese men feel such that they need these outlets?

Japanese culture is often heralded as some shining beacon of perfectness, but underneath the sheen of 'respect' and order there seems to be an awfully sick and prevalent underbelly of a real need for power over women.

I am pumping venture capital money into a fusion of this game and this project:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/science-news/6680989/Meat-grown-in-laboratory-in-world-first.html

Are there really enough fuckin weirdo pervs to fund this sort of shit?

OMG perversion is #1 use of Internet

>> ^spoco2:
Japanese culture is often heralded as some shining beacon of perfectness, but underneath the sheen of 'respect' and order there seems to be an awfully sick and prevalent underbelly of a real need for power over women.


I don't know much about japanese culture, but is this even mainstream? I don't see how you can judge an entire culture by its worst. Perhaps we get more exposure to the outliers of Japanese culture because the outliers are so fucked up. Perhaps in Japan their sifting up a videogame like Manhunt and wondering why Americans are all homicidal psychopaths.

Where's the 80 year old they used as a model for those boobs?

If this is objectification, then I don't even what to know what other games like GTA4 are in your mind. It isn't real, they are pixels. There are no real people like this simulated thing, just as Vice city isn't a real place and you didn't really kill those school children. Game over man, game over.

Simulations can not, by their very nature, be objectified because they are themselves actual objects, not complex figures of which we are denying their autonomy (because they don't have any!), or denying their subjectivity (as they don't have a subjective mind!). While we may comment on the type of person that plays this game, the game itself is not objectification, there are simply no real figures to objectify.

In short Fantasizing != Objectifying. If so, then people who play GTA4 are fucking murdering lunatics and people who play Black and White are blasphemous. You tread a slippy slope because you find the content objectionable to your tastes, but your inability to separate out fantastic from reality smacks of Jack Thompson.

The argument isn't that "Little Miss Pixels" here is being objectified, but rather that it's an example of the broader objectification of women.

The demo itself suggests an attitude that women are little more than playthings to be ogled and fondled, which is objectification.

The rest of your argument is a straw man based on your own suggestion that we must accept Jigglyjugs here as "real" because we must have a specific individual in mind to objectify, which is not the case. She plainly represents the image of a woman as a plaything.

GTA4 does glorify violence (and is a delightful escapist romp for it), and this demo does embody the objectification of women. Neither need be perceived as "real" for that to be true.

To put it another way - your own argument states that this simulation is "an object".
It is an object...in the form of a woman. That's the ultimate form of objectification - they've created a "woman" who is an object.

there has to be a line drawn.

I truly can't see why people are still making a fuss about these sorts of things. You need to realize that this wont influence anything that isn't already there.

It's the presence of a strong moral background that stops people from doing things, like accepting violent tendencies from video games and accepting them into their own life styles. The same works for any situation in any video game.

How do we know this objectifies anything? I see the claim that this is a "Hentai" video game, however, I see no proof of having any form of nudity in it, she doesn't have a camel toe, and nothing gets see-through as it gets wet. the only thing I've seen so far is a comment by mxxcon stating the game is a -Dating Simulator- that can be hooked to a webcam and react to how you act with it.

For all we know, the thing gets pissed off if you spend too long looking at her girlie parts, and the only thing we see get poked or prodded is her face, and thats by hands. The reason she's well endowed? Well, if it were me, I wouldn't be as flustered in real life talking to someone flat chested, assed, with a lazy eye and a terrible haircut as I would talking to someone like Meagan Fox.

Sure, that comment is somewhat sexist, but true. I can get past looks for personality and intelligence when it comes to dating, but if I were to approach someone of that caliber I'd probably be tripping over words and be somewhat uncomfortable.

Give me proof, rather then speculation. A term many on the sift are familiar with for their belief on religion. It stands just as true here. Stop saying this is objectifying women, without showing her be dominated by a male, be submissive when she is being fondled (Which this video shows that she isn't) or that she has no opinions and is only there to please her master (And without a translation, we don't know what she talks about during the video)

Until such time as any evidence to those are presented, I'll assume this is just a more adult version of project Milo for natal, and truly lives up to its "Dating Simulator" name, rather then some smut game.

With that mindset masturbation is objectification, which it is not. The biological component to any human is undeniable, and more succinctly, unrelenting. A day dream about a purely sexual encounter is not objectification, this is just an interactive version of that notion. You are confusing the temporary indulging of a fantasy with a portrayal of actual views. A man having or indulging in a sexual fantasy about a purely carnal satisfaction with a simulated women is harmless...truly.

She doesn't represent any real women...just look at her and look at the ridicules situation she is placed in. She is the embodiment of casual sexual nature of lust. You are also mistaking interacting with something as glorifying it. The issue of lust and fantasy is a mental state, not a rational outcome of choice. The dude who goes out for a night on the town just to get laid not caring about the women is participating in objectifying a women, because she is real. A person wanking it to girlfriend simulator 4000 is only indulging his male lust, he hurts no one. The former event requires you to not care about a flesh and blood women at all, the later only requires you to be aroused by an simulation of woman...its actually BETTER than real porn in the moralist sense (no REAL people were exposed to any degradation).

You have to separate fantasy from reality and also not make the mistake of over reaching with the implications of someone wanting to see a girl naked, that is just biology, not a rational choice of objectification. There has to be a victim of objectification, where is the victim? Unless your saying male lust IS objectification of ALL women ALWAYS, I can't see where you are going with this.

Thats all fine, all I know is that she better not kick any more sea water on my camera!

>> ^deathcow:
Thats all fine, all I know is that she better not kick any more sea water on my camera!


woo wooo, no need to get excited there sea man....

Her smile is creepy.

Oy...uncanny valley, anyone?

Wow. I've seen some of Illusions earlier games, but this takes the uncanny valley factor to new heights. This is more a turn off than a turn on. Especially the bloom is annoying.

Well, at least you're not raping junior high girls like in some of their other games.

I prefer porn.

P-P-P-Poke her face... P-P-Poke her face...

The enduring popularity of Hentai in the Internet Age is a mystery worthy of Sherlock Holmes. Something's obviously blocking their tubes over in Japan. Maybe it's masturbatory ejaculate.

This guy must be really annoying to have a conversation with. "STOP TOUCHING MY FACE!"

This is not uncanny valley for me, this is just the fake plains on one side of the valley.

Fuck, this thing IS realistic. This bitch just will NOT SHUT UP!!!

what is she saying??

>> ^deathcow:
what is she saying??

"Take out the trash. Pick your underwear up off the ground. Does this make me look fat? Where were you? Who were you with? Who are you talking to? Whatcha thinkin' about? It'd be nice if you helped me around the house sometime. Don't you think it'd be nice if we visited my mother? How come you never buy me flowers anymore..."

[redacted]

*dead

This video has been declared non-functional; embed code must be fixed within 2 days or it will be sent to the dead pool - declared dead by Stingray.