kronosposeidon says...

Choggie made a racist remark directed at burdturgler, basically saying he was a monkey. A very troll-worthy comment, in a long history of troll-worthy comments.

I support dag's decision. Choggie was banned from this community for all sorts of anti-social shenanigans, and yet he was eventually allowed to return anyway. He's been given more chances than anyone here EVER, yet he chooses to piss them away by his continued mean-spirited behavior.

Don't worry; he'll be back with a sock puppet account sooner than you can say 'linear thinking.'

therealblankman says...

Hmmm... Choggie's remark was certainly ad-hominem and, imho not terribly funny, I honestly don't understand why it would be considered inherently racist.

Tymbrwulf says...

Looks like the totalitarian banhammer was dropped on choggie instead of letting people speak by their ability to down-vote and ignore comments. Someone is a bit too sensitive IMHO.

dag says...

Comment hidden because you are ignoring dag. (show it anyway)

We had an agreement with Choggie on his return that he would avoid all ad hom attacks against members. That was part of the deal and not negotiable. To be honest I was keen to give it a try- I like the idea of second chances. In this case it just didn't work out.

schmawy says...

Choggie picked on a lot of people. Especially those he thought were smart enough and strong enough to be able to handle it. He often overestimated them, unfortunately.

darkrowan says...

I had, if I remember correctly, voted against letting him back. And though he's a cool guy (and, mind you, blew the anniversary power points he won on me and others) I can't say that I am surprised he got banned again. Sadly tact is not in his vocabulary (to be fair, he has his own dictionary ).

chilaxe says...

Saying someone isn't highly evolved sounds pretty mild relative to the political intolerance that's a regular part of life on the Sift.

As sifters, we have in the past gone so far as to literally call for the execution of those who disagree with us, and nobody bats an eye.

Napalm says...

Buhbye Choggie.

You will not be missed by me in the slightest.

A quick question to the people who are sad that he's banned (again): Why?

Nearly every post he's ever made has been worthless, unfunny or just plain offensive IMO.

schmawy says...

Here are 803 reasons "why" I care.
>> ^Napalm:

Buhbye Choggie.
You will not be missed by me in the slightest.
A quick question to the people who are sad that he's banned (again): Why?
Nearly every post he's ever made has been worthless, unfunny or just plain offensive IMO.

NordlichReiter says...



He won.

This, seems to me, to be exactly what he wanted.

But, and its a big but. He violated an agreement between himself and Dag. I assume that Dag reserved the right to banish Choggie as part of that agreement. I also assume that there is a section in the TOS that state racially over-toned statements directed at specific people will not be tolerated.

NordlichReiter says...

>> ^mintbbb:

About time.. I might come back now.


Why did you people leave? It's the Internet. There is nothing sacred on the internet. It is much better to ignore things. I get the feeling Choggie did all of these things to piss, you people that left, off. Trolls will troll, the best way to kill a troll is not to reply and simply ignore said troll.

EDIT: The above statements I made at the risk of offending said people, especially Mintbbb or Kronospeidon, for that I apologize.

Dag, perhaps it is time to make the ban permanent.

rasch187 says...

Overreaction, simple as that. Someone took way too much offense and someone decided to react without thinking it through properly.

choggie is one of the best sifters around and if he challenges people by either questioning them/their motives or just trolling them for the hell of it, he does so with good intentions. Too bad some of those people can't see it like that, but that's their problem. I'm sad to see him go.

rottenseed says...

I was a major proponent of his reinstatement, but he was wearing me thin. He seemed always out to pick a fight...which is fine, but his act was cringe-worthy given the fine line he had been given.

Originally, he came off as caring for this site so much that he would fight and kick to keep things the way he envisioned it. That's all well and good, and I don't blame him for having a passion for videosift. It starts to get old when just because he didn't agree with somebody or somebody's content, he'd cut down the video's poster. He's too volatile to get along happily on this site, in my opinion.

schmawy says...

One thing to make clear. Choggie is NOT a TROLL. That is him, through and through. You should try talking to him on the phone sometime.

Shepppard says...

Err, to those that are saying the monkey comment doesn't mean anything, and that we're all monkeys, it's dependent on how you take the term "monkey".

It could be a de-evolved version of ourselves, yes, or.. well.



Really, in terms of insults, its basically how burd took it to be, but.. that slur could've been a bit more racist then you're thinking.

mintbbb says...

Choggie never did anything nasty to me personally - however, my dear hubby, NetRunner, cannot say the same. Choggie was not the reason why I stopped sifting. I simply just burned out. But when Choggie was reinstated, I definitely didn't want to come back.

It is the Internet. I have been online since 1992. I know what goes on, just these days I have enought choices to just leave when a place becomes too much to bear. I am ignoring a lot, and I have had a thick skin. But enough is enough. You hurt my loved ones, you hurt me.

Yes, I am sorry, but I still am fragile! I am emotional! I take things personally! You might say nasty things because you think you are anonymous, and people who take things seriously are silly, but that's not true. You might be a troll and all you want to do is hurt, and it is silly to take you seriously, but people like me still do.. And the attacks might not be directed to me, but I don't want to be around trolls, or people who cannot say anything nice, or people who just have to add at least one kind of insult to any comment they make. I know, I can just sift and never pay attention to any comments, or any other videos. But I used to love this place and was happy to be here.

I might not come back just because Choggie is gone - but if/when I do, I am going to appreciate not having him here.

No drama for me any more. Sorry for being a princess, but I do have a choice. A Choggieless VS is a lot better than a Choggiefull one. Like I said, now I might be back. MIGHT.

I do miss sifting, but these days most people don't even remember me, or know me to begin with. Sigh.

*rant off*

Eek, erm.. OK, I don't even know how to edit a comment now.. pardon the messed up comments below:

>> ^NordlichReiter:

Why did you people leave? It's the Internet. There is nothing sacred on the internet. It is much better to ignore things. I get the feeling Choggie did all of these things to piss, you people that left, off. Trolls will troll, the best way to kill a troll is not to reply and simply ignore said troll.
EDIT: The above statements I made at the risk of offending said people, especially Mintbbb or Kronospeidon, for that I apologize.
Dag, perhaps it is time to make the ban permanent.
<div><div style="margin: 10px; overflow: auto; width: 80%; float: left; position: relative;" class="convoPiece"> mintbbb said:<img style="margin: 4px 10px 10px; float: left; width: 40px;" src="http://static1.videosift.com/avatars/m/mintbbb-s.jpg" onerror="ph(this)"><div style="position: absolute; margin-left: 52px; padding-top: 1px; font-size: 10px;" class="commentarrow">◄</div><div style="padding: 8px; margin-left: 60px; margin-top: 2px; min-height: 30px;" class="nestedComment box">About time.. I might come back now.
</div></div></div>

NordlichReiter says...

NordlichReiter Member Since: 2006-12-14

I remember you.

I also remember that half of my comments were cringe worthy, and some still are.

I remember JoeDirt, SnakePlissken; let's not go down that road.

rottenseed says...

>> ^schmawy:

One thing to make clear. Choggie is NOT a TROLL. That is him, through and through. You should try talking to him on the phone sometime.

I don't mind him. He seems like he could be a likable guy. I've heard nothing but raves from those that've actually met/spoken with him.

It's just that this place and him don't mix. I love my mom, but I'm not going to bring her to the club. And I love kronosposeidon, but I'm not gonna take him home to my mom. (she doesn't know about us)

videosiftbannedme says...

The problem with Choggie is he's Bob, from What About Bob? He'll never go away and the only way to get rid of him is Death Therapy.

...or letting him marry your sister. (cringe)

Shepppard says...

>> ^volumptuous:

Wait... He called someone a monkey and got kicked off the sift?
Am I missing something here?


>> ^choggie:

BT??...Downvote comments but respond in a fashion more fitting a mouth-breather....You have come down from the trees??...I mean, yer people have...Right???

therealblankman says...

Choggie is no troll. He sure as hell rubbed a lot of people the wrong way but that's their problem more than it is Choggie's. He was also never malicious in any way that I ever witnessed. An asshole then? Sure, but being an asshole ain't no crime last time I checked. We're all adults here, and if you haven't ever learned how to deal with assholes by the time you reach adulthood, then that's once again your problem. There are people on the sift whose crimes are greater than any ever perpetrated by Choggie. If being an offensive, racist and hateful troll are indeed crimes then Quantummushroom should have received the death penalty a long time ago, but he hasn't, nor should he. Choggie is none of those things, but when there was a boundary to test or a line to be crossed he was definitely your man.

We're a weaker community as of yesterday- without a little colour life is a lot less fun. It's not worth getting so worked about people- it's just an isolated little corner of the internet.

And I still haven't tried his Jambalaya.

volumptuous says...

I'm still not getting it. I've called people worse. In fact, the other day I called GeeSusFreek an idiot.

Oh wait. Clue me in here please, because I have no clue what race/ethnicity/gender/sexualpreference/etc/etc anyone is, so...


>> ^Shepppard:

>> ^volumptuous:
Wait... He called someone a monkey and got kicked off the sift?
Am I missing something here?

>> ^choggie:
BT??...Downvote comments but respond in a fashion more fitting a mouth-breather....You have come down from the trees??...I mean, yer people have...Right???


enoch says...

god i love this place.
but i have to say with choggie gone a bit of color just bleached out.
this is some tired ass bullshit.
this site when it first came out had a plethora of different people,ideas,emotions.
i mean talk about DIVERSE..i was mesmerized by this place...and choggie was a huge reason.
now look at it...
feels like twilight..the burnished sun fading over a bland landscape.
you think choggie is the reason so many left?
christ on a fucking stick...
are you serious? is that a serious statement?
ok..
try this.
go to posts two years ago.go ahead..i'll wait.
now..
go check the current top videos on this site.
see anything? notice anything?
it is becoming one big ball of sameness.
as if a giant vanilla cookie cutter was punching out the exact same material.
those people didnt leave because of choggie!
they left because this place started looking like a cheap version of the stepford wives.
they left because of the very thing we are talking about on this very post.
stupid and inane drama based on the most fragile and flimsy of all reasons:
"someone called me a name"
/facepalm...somebody just shoot me in the face.

because here is the cold hard truth kids.
this place was once a vibrant mecca for the most unique,obscure,challenging and original sites to visit.
populated by interesting people with interesting ideas and to watch the disagreements fly put a smile on my face that lasted for HOURS.
now it is slowly becoming an exercise in banality..
un-interesting and un-original.
so clap your hands together for that kids!
you just succeeded in killing originality!
the drama is even boring!
and that my friends..is the fucking cold hard truth..and you helped usher it in.

i dont have a problem with anyone here.
i understand dag had an agreement and had to do what he had to do.
i am not harboring a secret hatred for BT.
and i really should not have to even to explain this considering this is the internet and my feelings dont really matter in this situation but good-fucking-lord if i didnt people would start assuming i am out for revenge or gonna rampage or some other stupid shit.
that is...retarded.

choggie was banned per dag and his agreement...period.
choggie will..i assume..live another day and not commit ritual suicide.
but dont blame the ills of this site on the chogster.
look to your own behaviour before you blame another.

now THAT my friends..is what they call in the business A RANT.
please dont forget to tip your bartenders and waitresses..i'll be here all week!

gwiz665 says...

I blame the ills of choggie on choggie. Not the ills of the site. This was inevitable with his attitude and his tone. He was a troll with a cloak and for some reason people treat him like the fucking savior. He said he he was "waking people up" by calling them all idiots and spouting obscenities at them. Pfft, I grew tired of that quickly and ignored. Too much ego, too much self-righteousness. And I don't want to say much about his attitude to women (mostly because I do some of the same things) but if you think I was bad, he's worse.

I think the sift will be better for his ban in the end.


@enoch "go to posts two years ago.go ahead..i'll wait.
now..
go check the current top videos on this site.
see anything? notice anything?
it is becoming one big ball of sameness.
as if a giant vanilla cookie cutter was punching out the exact same material.
those people didnt leave because of choggie!
they left because this place started looking like a cheap version of the stepford wives."


People revere obscurity, but it's a hollow praise when they don't vote that way. We have a silent majority that wants what's at the top of the sift right now - who are you, or anyone of the taste-judges who have left,
to say they are wrong in their opinions and tastes?

I was there 2 years ago, it was the same. The people who have quit are the drama queens, the ego maniacs, the people who put their taste above everyone else's. I don't miss them. The rose-tinted glasses of yesteryear colors a lot, but in actuality there was very little difference between then and now.

New egos will rise, new originality will blossom. It's only natural.

If my memory serves, certain prominent members tried to make a video cult site devoted to eclectic and obscure tastes. it's not around anymore, and I didn't expect it to either, because they actively discouraged popularity and that's a recipe for failure.

"because here is the cold hard truth kids.
this place was once a vibrant mecca for the most unique,obscure,challenging and original sites to visit.
populated by interesting people with interesting ideas and to watch the disagreements fly put a smile on my face that lasted for HOURS.
now it is slowly becoming an exercise in banality..
un-interesting and un-original.
so clap your hands together for that kids!
you just succeeded in killing originality!
the drama is even boring!
and that my friends..is the fucking cold hard truth..and you helped usher it in."


Rose tinted glasses again. This was always a liberal, atheist site with a few outliers with different opinions. There are still very interesting discussions and interesting disagreements, but they are stifled with dramaah which someone like choggie was good at making. He had a knack for walking in on a thread and basically killing any hope of a meaningful discussion. I feel just fine that he got himself ousted. I thought it would take less than 6 months, but it was a nice try to give him a second chance - worth a shot, but, for me anyway, it's over now.

Originality is an antithesis to popularity, usually, and the site is based on popularity. This is not a new discussion, it's always been like this.

You just have to look closer for originality. Compare with youtube, you can't find quality there without drowning in a sea of shit - I prefer the sift any day.

rottenseed says...

@enoch

There's no way choggie could come back and be himself so even if he were to come back...the eggshells that'd need to be traversed in order for him to give his opinion, wouldn't allow choggie to be choggie.

volumptuous says...

This doesn't make any sense to me at all.

Choggie calls someone a monkey, then because of an "agreement with dag", he gets booted. Correct me if I'm wrong, but WE HAD A FUCKING POLL TO LET HIM BACK ON. That was not an agreement with any individual.

I'm getting pretty sick of the stupid double standards around here.

Dag: If you want to make the rules, then just make them, and be public about it. Don't pretend we have any say in anything by creating a meaningless poll.

I have Quantum and Winston both on ignore. I really really dislike their comments here, but I wouldn't think of banning them because of it (actually, I did want Winston kicked off since he's never once attempted to sift a video). But hell, just use the ignore function if you don't like someone.


And once again: Can someone explain to me why calling someone a monkey is so horrible?

peggedbea says...

a. if he's a troll, you're only feeding him with this.
b. he's a not a troll, i've met the guy, he's a muck-racker, a true eccentric, possibly a tinge drug fried, but no troll.
c. i despise this "let's ban/reinstate/ban choggie and once he's gone lets devote umpteen sift talk posts to listing what we like/don't like about him and attempt to sum up his character based on the internet comments he left, most of which we don't even understand. let's be sure to talk about him like he's not here. let's make sure to really suck while we're doing it"
d. it's basically come down academics vs. eccentrics. choggie being the eccentric, the sift being largely academic sort of personalities. he's not good at articulating his intentions for you, and they're often misunderstood.
e. seriously, blankfist has been baiting burdy with racist comments for MONTHS. he harasses people with asshole dick-ish comments constantly. he abuses his crown privileges to fuck with people who OBVIOUSLY don't appreciate it. and he most likely creates tons of joke sock-puppets. i would never ever vote to ban that douchebag. but the idea that we have a collective shit-gasm over choggie's bad behavior while simultaneously choosing to collectively ignore/encourage it out of assgravy over there is one of the reasons why i will ALWAYS vote against banning/siftquisistions . and the reason i think you're all a bunch of fucking assholes.

enoch says...

@ qwiz and rottenseed.
i think maybe my point got lost in my rant.
so let me clarify:
i never agreed with choggies tactics,i found them to be abrasive and confrontational,but i did agree wholeheartedly on his intent.
which was to promote discussion by way of stirring the wasps nest.
i had told him that may be a counterproductive tactic but that was him..meh../shrugs.
so please do not take my rant as a "choggie is my savior".
it is not.
i just liked him and his quirky ways.
i am also not diminishing nor marginalizing those who have had bad experiences with choggie.the private messages and enflammatory comments directed at a particular person.that was their experience and they feel the way they do based on those experiences..who am i too judge the validity of their emotions?
what i WAS addressing however was how i was watching,and not for the first time,people putting blame on the chogster for certain trends and tendencies of this site.
that is a falsehood.
many good people.interesting and unique people left not due to choggies antics but rather the ever-increasing group-think that has permeated this site more and more.
you may disagree and that is your right but it also another discussion and one i welcome gladly.i think i could make a pretty strong case.
i totally agree with you qwiz on the points of popularity and the ebb and flow of users.
you will get no argument from me but that wasn't my point.
while the sift still retains a colorful dynamic that dynamic is nowhere near as diverse as it used to be.
because the group-mind sees any deviation from what they perceive as true and righteous as an affront to their sensibilities.
so anybody with a different voice,opinion or view is quickly pounced on and berated.
that me be done politely,even cordially but it is still done and it is usually done enmasse.
what i find so sad is that many here dont even realize this.
they dont see it.
i am not pointing this out not to be confrontational.
i am just stating an observation..not a judgment.
THIS is what choggie was fighting against.
detest his methods but understand his motivation.
i engage in a different way...
i vote up a video that i know the groupmind will ignore totally.i may not,and many times do not,agree with the content but if it offers a different voice..a different perspective then i will vote it up..even promote it if i have the PP's.
choggie fought against a collective myopia.
others..and we are few..(you know who you are)do the same but use different tactics.
so what if he sounded like don rickles on a crystal meth bender,at least he was entertaining and original.
but a deal is a deal and choggie broke that deal.
ok...those be the rules.
and rottenseed is spot on.
choggie has to be choggie and some here are far too sensitive to look past his abrasive nature (hurtful PM's aside)because they have no understanding the reasons for his words and actions.
this is why i stated "look to yourself before you place blame on another".
because just like you felt attacked by choggie on your posts or on your page many and i mean MANY felt the same way when they tried to share their religion,or their politics or philosophy.
all it takes is that first person to start in and the rest chime in like parrots,sqawking the same line.
just because you may not have been as vitriolic as choggie or abrasive and confrontational does not mean the very SAME results occured to them as choggie made YOU feel.
and there lies the hypocrisy.

as i stated in my previous comment.
i love this place and that still remains true.
i came to this site for three years everyday until i finally decided to share and archive.
i do not regret that decision.
there are some great people here.interesting and unique.even the members who,in my opinion,are part of the collective i like..i may disagree with them and the mental coma i perceive them to be in..but i still like them as people.
choggie was nemesis.
i wonder how many here who villified him will find that dynamic something they will miss?
real easy to think you are right when nobody is punching holes in your premise..
choggie drove a truck through.
i will miss my friends voice here on the sift.

direpickle says...

>> ^volumptuous:

And once again: Can someone explain to me why calling someone a monkey is so horrible?

"Monkey" is used as a pejorative word for black people, in (some parts of) the United States.

blankfist says...

>> ^peggedbea:
seriously, blankfist has been baiting burdy with racist comments for MONTHS. he harasses people with asshole dick-ish comments constantly. he abuses his crown privileges to fuck with people who OBVIOUSLY don't appreciate it. and he most likely creates tons of joke sock-puppets. i would never ever vote to ban that douchebag. but the idea that we have a collective shit-gasm over choggie's bad behavior while simultaneously choosing to collectively ignore/encourage it out of assgravy over there is one of the reasons why i will ALWAYS vote against banning/siftquisistions . and the reason i think you're all a bunch of fucking assholes.


You need to get off my nuts, lady. Everything you're saying is speculative and unfounded. I'm not baiting burdy. We're good friends who had a recent argument we got over. For the record, I like Patti Smith and listen to her regularly on my iTunes. I'm not abusing any crown privileges, and even if I was I think that would be taken care of in some way or another by dag and lucky. And I have zero sock puppets. You're just trying to be a little shit starter. [OMITTED] And your punctuation is atrocious. Capitalize a sentence or two, please. Now go away.

deathcow says...

fuck this, this community sucks anymore, I'm out of here for the last time, forever

ok just kidding I'm back
ooooo look shiny badges!!

alien_concept says...

"You're just trying to be a little shit starter. You did the same thing by making up shit when another Sifter came to visit you in Texas, and I think that's abhorrent and disgusting."

Whatever else points you bring up about bea, I don't honestly give a shit. But this part, I can't just let slide. The only reason anyone else from the sift knew anything about that is because I threw a major hissy fit and she didn't have much choice but to say it in public. Please don't bring it up as some kind of defense.

blankfist says...

@alien_concept, I don't want to make waves here with people. There's enough bad blood between Sifters, and I'm ready for all of us to make amends and move on without any further drama. I apologize if this bothers you and I don't mean to pick the scabs of old wounds. [OMITTED]

She is starting shit and has done so in a couple posts now. I want her to know I don't approve and won't go quietly without retribution. Targeting me is just projecting and finding someone to demonize for choggie's ban. I didn't ban him. I didn't petition to ban him. Leave me out of it.

gwiz665 says...

>> ^alien_concept:

"You're just trying to be a little shit starter. You did the same thing by making up shit when another Sifter came to visit you in Texas, and I think that's abhorrent and disgusting."
Whatever else points you bring up about bea, I don't honestly give a shit. But this part, I can't just let slide. The only reason anyone else from the sift knew anything about that is because I threw a major hissy fit and she didn't have much choice but to say it in public. Please don't bring it up as some kind of defense.


Indeed, let's let that particular dead horse lie.

gwiz665 says...

@enoch I agree with most everything you said, except this:
"real easy to think you are right when nobody is punching holes in your premise..
choggie drove a truck through."


Being abrasive, aggressive and plain obnoxious does not constitute "punching holes in your premise". But I do agree, there was some occasional insight. Much was not insightful at all though, just ugh.

Anyway, it'll be fun to see what will happen in the future of the site. I'm eager to see the future developments.

dystopianfuturetoday says...

^Yeah @enoch, perception is a funny thing. While you saw a powerful argument, I saw basically two vague-to-the-point-of-meaningless arguments repeated ad nauseum. Those arguments were:

1) It's all a distraction.
2) You are all a bunch of (adorably misspelled insult here).

His ideology is slim enough to fit on a bumper sticker.

I don't think anyone would disagree that the corporate media distracts us from issues that are potentially damaging to corporations. They love issues like gay marriage and abortion, which have few financial ramifications for big money. But you know what? There is plenty of quality reporting out there. Foreign policy, health care, the bailouts and other meaningful issues have been covered at great length and with impressive depth.

The major undoing of choggian bumper sticker politics is the fact that the media he tends to criticize is often the more honest and progressive reporting of people like Rachel Maddows. And when he does decide to lay into Rachel, he does it with the intellectual heft of a flea, with dumb ass comments about her sexual orientation and the way she styles her hair. I've never heard any kind of in depth, insightful or intelligent analysis from choggie beyond the vague and redundant bumper sticker refrains: It's all a distraction, she's a dyke cunt, you are all monkeys.....

If you have a problem with Rachel, then by all means speak up, but an argument requires some bare modicum of substance before it can be taken seriously.

Lastly, do you know what lies at the end of choggie's yellow brick road? Do you know what we are all being distracted from? Satanic UFOs, the illuminati, Bildaburgers, New World Orders among other conspiracies. Say what you will about Republicans, Democrats, Libertarians and Greens, but at least their belief systems don't play like an episode guide of the X-Files.

Anyway. I enjoyed the choggie freak show as much as anyone else, heck, I even voted to bring him back (sorry nr, kp, bf and bt), but he has been nothing but a bile spewing asshole ever since he's been back. I won't make that mistake again. He's lost my support for good.

volumptuous says...

OK, I didn't know that BT is AA. Yeah, that's a pretty shitty comment, and in the VS rules, you're not supposed to attack someone like that. Kinda goes beyond any "agreement" dag and he made.

But seriously, still gotta cut with the double standards here. As much as I like BF, he has clearly violated the sift rules on numerous occasions, and gets away with it without even a slap on the wrist. If people are hobbited or ban-hammered, you can't pick and choose based on cool-ness or number of sifted vids.
>> ^direpickle:

>> ^volumptuous:
And once again: Can someone explain to me why calling someone a monkey is so horrible?

"Monkey" is used as a pejorative word for black people, in (some parts of) the United States.

blankfist says...

What do you mean "clearly violated the site rules"? You pointed a finger at me once about what you thought was my sockpuppet account. That was obviously dealt with, and if I wasn't banned then that should answer your question as to whether or not I was guilty. Also there was some question as to whether or not I abused a Sift power, which if I did there again dag or lucky would've punished me appropriately. Not everything is a public, communal affair.

I may push boundaries, and I've been punished with hobbles if you've forgotten, but I never purposely violate site rules so far as I can remember.

Don't compare what happened to choggie with what I've done in the past. Choggie was on probation and dag banned him. That has nothing to do with me. I didn't ban him or petition to have him banned. Please, leave me out of it. Cheers. No hard feelings.

Shepppard says...

>> ^volumptuous:

OK, I didn't know that BT is AA. Yeah, that's a pretty shitty comment, and in the VS rules, you're not supposed to attack someone like that. Kinda goes beyond any "agreement" dag and he made.
But seriously, still gotta cut with the double standards here. As much as I like BF, he has clearly violated the sift rules on numerous occasions. If people are hobbited or ban-hammered, you can't pick and choose based on cool-ness or number of sifted vids.
>> ^direpickle:
>> ^volumptuous:
And once again: Can someone explain to me why calling someone a monkey is so horrible?

"Monkey" is used as a pejorative word for black people, in (some parts of) the United States.



Well, from what I understand whereas yeah, the sifters voted yes/no for allowing choggie back on, the only way it would be allowed was if he agreed that he would strictly adhere to the sifts rules since he was being allowed back.

I don't know if you remember it (most likely, because it wasn't exactly subtle) but the reason choggie got banned in the first place was because he threw a giant hissy fit for not being allowed another channel. He went on a giant downvoting and *.discarding spree, because he wanted his account removed.

Whereas yeah, people bend the rules and break them here and there, there's a little bit of tolerance because on the whole they haven't done stupid shit in the past. (example, downvoting spree)

enoch says...

i agree with you DST and i stated as much.
i am not defending his words nor his actions.i disagreed with his tactics and have told him so on more than one occasion.belittling or berating someone whose view is different from your is not conducive for a productive discussion.
what i did speak about was his intent,which was never to be as destructive as it was received.
now this may be due to the fact that choggie and i never had words.
we had disagreements and i would call him on blatant ruses and shenanigans.he never tore in to me..i usually got a chuckle out of him.
even if he did tear into me..who cares?
that is what an ignore function is for.i would never use that function because that just ruins the fun..but that is me..others may be more sensitive to disparaging remarks and maybe they should utilize the ignore function more often.i cannot speak for others.
the other item i addressed was the collective myopia.it does not sit right with me to put blame on a person where it should not lay.the very things some people are complaining about..after the fact mind you...are reactions to choggies hyperbolic commentaries.
ok..i think it is apparent that choggie deserves that for his personalized attacks,but what about those who do the very same thing but in a different form and fashion?
it is hypocritical to point the finger at a man and say "you made me feel like such and such by saying this or that" while at the very same time making others feel just as marginalized and outcast.
does it really matter if the vehicle was polite and cordial if the results are the same?
i can hit you with a tempered steel hammer or a cloth covered baseball bat..either way i am breaking your skull.
see what i am saying?
choggie is responsible for choggie.
he made a deal and broke the terms and people complained forcing dag to end the agreement.
that is the reality.
i am just gonna miss his voice.
i dont have to agree with everything he says to do that..do i?

burdturgler says...

If anyone needs someone to direct their anger at over choggie being banned, direct it at me. I am the one who publicly made a comment to dag about his post. I never asked dag to ban him, but I am grateful that he did. And I'm not going to defend myself, or my lack of strength and intelligence that was supposedly required to fully understand the divine purpose behind the hateful remarks made toward me. So, have at me. There is no need to fight amongst yourselves.

Blankfist and I had an argument. He apologized both publicly and privately. It's amazing how much a simple honest apology can change things. Maybe if choggie, in his "parting words", found those words, things wouldn't be where they are right now.

rottenseed says...

>> ^burdturgler:

If anyone needs someone to direct their anger at over choggie being banned, direct it at me. I am the one who publicly made a comment to dag about his post. I never asked dag to ban him, but I am grateful that he did. And I'm not going to defend myself, or my lack of strength and intelligence that was supposedly required to fully understand the divine purpose behind the hateful remarks made toward me. So, have at me. There is no need to fight amongst yourselves.
Blankfist and I had an argument. He apologized both publicly and privately. It's amazing how much a simple honest apology can change things. Maybe if choggie, in his "parting words", found those words, things wouldn't be where they are right now.


Well then, I'm sorry in advance for anything that I might (and probably will) say to you. You can take this to the bank...the sperm bank.

chicchorea says...

Hello. Long time lurker, first time poseur.

Just something off my poll.

Vote? Eh? Know what I mean? Eh? Eh? Nudge nudge, wink wink. Know what I mean? Nudge nudge, wink wink. Did someone say vote? Know what I mean? Know what I mean? Nudge nudge. Say no more, say no more. Poll? Eh? Wink wink. Poll? Eh? Eh? Poll anyone? Say no more. Nudge nudge, wink wink. Anyone up for a poll? Know what I mean? Nudge nudge, wink wink. Do you like pols [sic]? Know what I mean? Know what I mean? nudge nudge, wink wink. Say no more, a nod's as good as a wink to a blind bat.

Please forgive the blanket ad homonym attack. Okay, this post is homophonic as well.

Know what I mean? Nudge nudge, wink wink. Say no more.




I'm your huckleberry.

chicchorea says...

Why? Whatever would make you ask that?

That was easier and faster than I expected.

Now...breathe deeply and count backwards from one hundred...you won't feel a th.......


Alrighty then...#10 Scalpel


QUICK DRAW THAT CURTAIN!

KnivesOut says...

>> ^thinker247:

Such a divisive character. Don't worry, in three days go see the stone rolled away from his profile page.


THE PROPHECY IS FULFILLED!>> ^chicchorea:

Why? Whatever would make you ask that?
That was easier and faster than I expected.
Now...breathe deeply and count backwards from one hundred...you won't feel a th.......

Alrighty then...#10 Scalpel

QUICK DRAW THAT CURTAIN!

blankfist says...

^chicchorea's account has been around since 2009. There's another probie account that immediately changed its avatar to Kronos' dinosaur avatar immediately after choggie was banned (coincidence?). Those are most likely two sock puppets he's had for a long time. Maybe there are more?

kymbos says...

Alright, I have read almost everything written about Choggie's departure, and it's surprising how many divergent opinions I agree with. But I think you're all missing the true tragedy of this situation...

If I left, I wouldn't attract nearly as much attention. Do you people realise how that makes me feel?

Thanks.

Shepppard says...

>> ^kymbos:

Alright, I have read almost everything written about Choggie's departure, and it's surprising how many divergent opinions I agree with. But I think you're all missing the true tragedy of this situation...
If I left, I wouldn't attract nearly as much attention. Do you people realise how that makes me feel?
Thanks.


...who the hell are you?

joedirt says...

This is the most pathetic bunch of losers who are the ruling class on this site.

I love, love, love the pages of tl'dr tirades about how blah blah the internet is and how people should act a certain way and why blah blah cry cry cry butthurt butthurt.

I love you idiots who cry and are so sad because someone used the word monkey.

It is like the same three people over and over again crying over someone's comments. It is so hilarious.

joedirt says...

For the record, Choggie never called anyone a monkey (recently).
He said something about have your people come out of the trees yet, in a you-are-so-retarded-you-haven't-evolved reference, or possibly any number of tree-dwelling animals, including ewoks.

Then some crybaby linked to it on dag's page instead of sending PM's to dag or choggie.
You people really have NOTHING better to do. You don't realize how many people this clique has driven from this website. In fact, there is a certain openness and pace of growth a website like this must sustain, and the little cat-video-clique has totally turned this website into a niche community of inbred users (meaning the userbase is stagnant) which abuses power and makes big fucking deals out of nothing just in a simple play to flex their e-Peens (it's a term, not a reference to gender).

Send this Article to a Friend



Separate multiple emails with a comma (,); limit 5 recipients






Your email has been sent successfully!

Manage this Video in Your Playlists

New Blog Posts from All Members