Perpetual Motion

Sagemindsays...

Comments on YouTube claim that this is somehow fake - that there is a fan somehow blowing on it.

I see no fan in the one direction they show and his body blocks it from any wind on the other side while he is filming so..

Any takers...?

Reefiesays...

>> ^Sagemind:

So..., The best I could find was that it wouldn't be considered perpetual motion because it uses an outside force - in this case gravity.


Surely gravity and magnets are perfectly viable forces to use within a perpetual motion device?

GeeSussFreeKsays...

>> ^Sagemind:

So..., The best I could find was that it wouldn't be considered perpetual motion because it uses an outside force - in this case gravity.


Gravity is being used to pull the peices down, but you also have to life the peices up on the other side, this isn't an outside force on the entire object because the entire reference of the object is in gravity. My guess is a fan or an occational flick of which we see something like that at 22s. Even a string could do it, though be a bit more obvious

FishBulbsays...

Even if it can spin under it's own power (without fans or string, etc) try hooking it up to something else to extract work out of it. I think you'll find it slowing to a halt fairly quickly.

Jinxsays...

Anybody that says they've built a perpetual motion machine should be viewed with the same skepticism as somebody who claims they've built a time machine.

Saying that, Calvin (and Hobbes) built some very interesting machines out of cardboard ;3

ReverendTedjokingly says...

>> ^Jinx:

Anybody that says they've built a perpetual motion machine should be viewed with the same skepticism as somebody who claims they've built a time machine.
But the man who claims to have built both might be worth taking seriously, because wouldn't that be one of the first things you brought back from the future?

BicycleRepairMansays...

Perpetual motion due to gravity isnt possible like this, because it pulls the wheel down on the upwards moving side.

I'm guessing a small fan under the table (between the table and the bed) to counter the effect of gravity on that side

robbersdog49says...

>> ^FishBulb:

Even if it can spin under it's own power (without fans or string, etc) try hooking it up to something else to extract work out of it. I think you'll find it slowing to a halt fairly quickly.


If it can work under it's own power then it's perpetual motion. You don't need to be able to extract power from it (although in a system like this power is being extracted all the time, heat from the axle, sound energy from the whole thing).

As for where the cheat is, if there's a ceiling fan in the room that would keep it going. To everyone trying to work out if it's fake, it is. There's no debate there. There's a hundred different ways this could be faked.

ETA: Just watch the lower hanging card strips when it's getting started.

quantumushroomsays...

Put this contraption in a Lucite box where no direct heat or wind can affect it. Then disconnect or remove the hidden motor or magnets.

Then maybe you've got something.

>> ^Sagemind:

Comments on YouTube claim that this is somehow fake - that there is a fan somehow blowing on it.
I see no fan in the one direction they show and his body blocks it from any wind on the other side while he is filming so..
Any takers...?

VidRothsays...

Lol, I'm assuming the "debate" is the bored vs. the bored, because this isn't even a new *design*.

The cool thing in this video is that none of us thought of making one out of cardboard.

Trancecoachsays...

the relative rigidity of the flaps of cardboard contributes to their tendency to straighten, thereby pushing wind into the flap before them in the direction of the turn. Over time, however, this rigidity will weaken and the flaps will need to be replaced.

On a separate note, is the cameraman drunk?? zooming in an out and unable to hold the camera still for shit!

lucky760says...

:O Well fuck me sideways...
written by acidSpine
Until the moment the universe stops expanding, or until the moment when monkeys fly out of my butt (whichever comes first of course) this will remain a pack of *lies.
written by therealblankman
>> ^therealblankman:
Until the moment the universe stops expanding, or until the moment when monkeys fly out of my butt (whichever comes first of course) this will remain a pack of lies.
I'd say "lies" does not apply here since all the so-called PMMs in here, like the description more or less states are using an external source of energy: earths gravity. So technically, they are not PMMs. edit: Wait... I just destroyed my own argument... "lies" applies since they are not PMMs.
written by TheGenk
>> ^TheGenk:
>> ^therealblankman:

Until the moment the universe stops expanding, or until the moment when monkeys fly out of my butt (whichever comes first of course) this will remain a pack of lies.


I'd say "lies" does not apply here since all the so-called PMMs in here, like the description more or less states are using an external source of energy: earths gravity.
So technically, they are not PMMs.

edit: Wait... I just destroyed my own argument... "lies" applies since they are not PMMs.
Hmmm... you might want to re-think the whole "Gravity being used as an external source of energy" thing. That's not what's happening here as gravity can not be used in such a sense. You can certainly use gravity as a way of converting potential energy into kinetic energy, but such energy is always quickly dissipated as heat. The classic example of this is having a mass at the top of a ramp and releasing that stored energy by allowing the mass to roll down that ramp. Once that mass reaches the bottom of the ramp, with perhaps a few oscillations until the energy is completely expended, then that's it- the "machine" comes to a complete halt and all the energy is spent. These machines in the video seek to return the mass to the top of the ramp over and over again without using outside energy to do so, and without losing any energy within the system itself, which is impossible.
written by therealblankman
@therealblankman: Ah yes, you're right. So, it's more of an efficiency thing. Losing the least amount of excess energy provided by the first push to complete one cycle. Anyways it stands as before, they are not PMMs.
written by TheGenk
You can't win, you can't break even and you can't quit the game. You can however troll a whole lot of people with some strategically-placed motors and pumps.
written by Mammaltron
Would you even need pumps or motors in this case? We don't see any of them operate long enough to prove they can overcome friction and other forces to keep in motion as we only see them for a very short time. The train one stuck me as odd, even on first viewing, as it seemed the green line was made to make you think that was the level line, but it seemed to me to be slanted down some, using the grain and a slightly tilted camera to make it look like it was going uphill... >> ^Mammaltron:
You can't win, you can't break even and you can't quit the game.

You can however troll a whole lot of people with some strategically-placed motors and pumps.
written by RFlagg
>> ^acidSpine:
Well fuck me sideways...
OK. Let me add *music first. :P
written by ant
>> ^RFlagg:
Would you even need pumps or motors in this case? We don't see any of them operate long enough to prove they can overcome friction and other forces to keep in motion as we only see them for a very short time.
The train one stuck me as odd, even on first viewing, as it seemed the green line was made to make you think that was the level line, but it seemed to me to be slanted down some, using the grain and a slightly tilted camera to make it look like it was going uphill...

>> ^Mammaltron:

You can't win, you can't break even and you can't quit the game.

You can however troll a whole lot of people with some strategically-placed motors and pumps.

In the "Uphill Train" example you're missing the fact that there are two ramps at play, one steep and one shallow. The shallow ramp is the wooden ramp with the green lines which does indeed run uphill, but the "downhill" ramp is the double-cone "train" itself. Once it reaches the bottom of the hill (the outside tips of the cones) that's the end of the ramp, and the energy is depleted. The mass is not in fact running uphill at all, the net movement is still downhill. Follow?
written by therealblankman
View Full Video and Comment Listing at VideoSift

Sagemindsays...

Like a lot of these types of videos, I want them to be true.
However, my brain immediately starts screaming the there is something wrong here. And yes, the first thought I had was how precise those pieces of cardboard needed to be, mainly because of weight. also how hitting the center for the axle had to be absolutely precise to guarantee balance. (Precision I don't think you can get from cardboard.)

As far as the wight of lifting each of those flaps back up, I wouldn't think that the swinging flap would have enough energy to keep it going. Visually I see it happening in the video but I immediately question it. Again I want it to be true - think of the possibilities - but the skeptic in me tells me something else is at play here, even if I can't see it.

In reply to this comment by dannym3141:
Hi, don't know if you're satisfied about this video yet but;

If you accept purely gravitational motion, then the kinetic energy gained from lowering any individual card segment must be paid back in full when you raise it back up on the other side. Now factor in resistances (the pen cartridge axle, air resistance, and it's making noise which is a form of energy) and you quickly realise that for the whole thing to spin there must be an external application of energy.

Even consider how accurately he would have had to cut all those cardboard pieces to make them the exact same weight so that heavier ones didn't cause the contraption to slow. I can attest that i've made these types of things as a kid, as soon as you start building one you start to feel why it can't work; you can kinda feel the principle of conservation of energy yourself.

I have references if you need :
In reply to this comment by Sagemind:
Comments on YouTube claim that this is somehow fake - that there is a fan somehow blowing on it.

I see no fan in the one direction they show and his body blocks it from any wind on the other side while he is filming so..

Any takers...?


Send this Article to a Friend



Separate multiple emails with a comma (,); limit 5 recipients






Your email has been sent successfully!

Manage this Video in Your Playlists




notify when someone comments
X

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
  
Learn More