Ex-girlfriend hits Starcraft fan where it hurts

Who needs a Zerg Rush? She's in UR email, killin UR beta.
NordlichReitersays...

Hmm, She went into his email?


§ 2701. Unlawful Access to Stored Communications

(a) Offense.--Except as provided in subsection (c) of this section whoever–

(1) intentionally accesses without authorization a facility through which an electronic communication service is provided; or

(2) intentionally exceeds an authorization to access that facility; and thereby obtains, alters, or prevents authorized access to a wire or electronic communication while it is in electronic storage in such system shall be punished as provided in subsection (b) of this section.

(b) Punishment.--The punishment for an offense under subsection (a) of this section is–

(1) if the offense is committed for purposes of commercial advantage, malicious destruction or damage, or private commercial gain--
(A) a fine under this title or imprisonment for not more than one year, or both, in the case of a first offense under this subparagraph; and
(B) a fine under this title or imprisonment for not more than two years, or both, for any subsequent offense under this subparagraph; and
(2) a fine under this title or imprisonment for not more than six months, or both, in any other case.

(c) Exceptions.--Subsection (a) of this section does not apply with respect to conduct authorized–

(1) by the person or entity providing a wire or electronic communications service;

(2) by a user of that service with respect to a communication of or intended for that user; or

(3) in section 2703, 2704 or 2518 of this title.


She violated Federal Law, possibly much more.

§ 1343. Fraud by Wire, Radio, or Television
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/1343.html

But more to the point, she intercepted communication which is the same as taking someones mail before they can read it.


18 U.S.C. § 2511(1)(a).

(1) Except as otherwise specifically provided in this chapter any person who—
(a) intentionally intercepts, endeavors to intercept, or procures any other person to intercept or endeavor to intercept, any wire, oral, or electronic communication;


http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/1343.html

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/usc_sec_18_00002511----000-.html

http://www.ibls.com/internet_law_news_portal_view.aspx?s=latestnews&id=2149

http://www.justice.gov/criminal/cybercrime/usc2701.htm



You can see my comment here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QIlWwI0rmFs&feature=player_embedded

The moral of the story is don't be petty. It could make you a felon.

choggiesays...

>> ^NordlichReiter:

Hmm, She went into his email?


§ 2701. Unlawful Access to Stored Communications
(a) Offense.--Except as provided in subsection (c) of this section whoever–
(1) intentionally accesses without authorization a facility through which an electronic communication service is provided; or
(2) intentionally exceeds an authorization to access that facility; and thereby obtains, alters, or prevents authorized access to a wire or electronic communication while it is in electronic storage in such system shall be punished as provided in subsection (b) of this section.
(b) Punishment.--The punishment for an offense under subsection (a) of this section is–
(1) if the offense is committed for purposes of commercial advantage, malicious destruction or damage, or private commercial gain--
(A) a fine under this title or imprisonment for not more than one year, or both, in the case of a first offense under this subparagraph; and
(B) a fine under this title or imprisonment for not more than two years, or both, for any subsequent offense under this subparagraph; and
(2) a fine under this title or imprisonment for not more than six months, or both, in any other case.
(c) Exceptions.--Subsection (a) of this section does not apply with respect to conduct authorized–
(1) by the person or entity providing a wire or electronic communications service;
(2) by a user of that service with respect to a communication of or intended for that user; or
(3) in section 2703, 2704 or 2518 of this title.

She violated Federal Law, possibly much more.
§ 1343. Fraud by Wire, Radio, or Television
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/1343.html
But more to the point, she intercepted communication which is the same as taking someones mail before they can read it.

18 U.S.C. § 2511(1)(a).
(1) Except as otherwise specifically provided in this chapter any person who—
(a) intentionally intercepts, endeavors to intercept, or procures any other person to intercept or endeavor to intercept, any wire, oral, or electronic communication;

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/1343.html
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/usc_sec_18_00002511----000-.html

http://www.ibls.com/internet_law_news_portal_view.aspx?s=latest
news&id=2149

http://www.justice.gov/criminal/cybercrime/usc2701.htm


You can see my comment here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QIlWwI0rmFs&feature=player_embedded
The moral of the story is don't be petty. It could make you a felon.


you complete cock-blocking insect piece of SHIT!....hehehe, you don't get laid much, huh??

choggiesays...

Felonious acts are a walk in the park...let's get you on a list why don;t we...C'mon....look back or in a mirror and find some dirt on yerself ya Bolshevik!

Yogisays...

The next clip has gotta be her sitting on her bathroom floor singing along and crying..

CRAWLING INNNN MY SKIIIINNNNN THESE WOUNDS THEY WILLL NOT HEEEEAAAAALLLLLL!!!

choggiesays...

>> ^Yogi:

The next clip has gotta be her sitting on her bathroom floor singing along and crying..
CRAWLING INNNN MY SKIIIINNNNN THESE WOUNDS THEY WILLL NOT HEEEEAAAAALLLLLL!!!


Awwww, don't be so hard on the woman-She had to suffer a nose-picker...a video-game-is-more-important-than-the-girl kinna shlubb-Plenty of them here who have never lucked into a relationship with anything but their custom joysticks-

lampishthingsays...

Hey now. The loving relationship I have with my custom joystick is none of your business, chogster.>> ^choggie:

>> ^Yogi:
The next clip has gotta be her sitting on her bathroom floor singing along and crying..
CRAWLING INNNN MY SKIIIINNNNN THESE WOUNDS THEY WILLL NOT HEEEEAAAAALLLLLL!!!

Awwww, don't be so hard on the woman-She had to suffer a nose-picker...a video-game-is-more-important-than-the-girl kinna shlubb-Plenty of them here who have never lucked into a relationship with anything but their custom joysticks-

lampishthingsays...

That's brilliant!

The video is fake though. She created that account on 5th april and, lo-and-behold, an account for brad appears on the 6th (it's linked to on her YT page).

If you look at her favourite videos she's acting in them.

The account user is also hunting down duplicates (see her recently posted comments) which doesn't really seem like typical bunny burner behaviour.

Oh, AND SHE'S DOCUMENTING HERSELF BREAKING LAWS. Here's the second vid.



>> ^Seric:

Well done miss, excellently executed. Steal your ex-boyfriend's beta key email, print it out, show yourself shredding it, and then upload it to youtube in a resolution that constitutes '720p'.
No one could screen shot that at all.
http://img691.imageshack.us/img691/4671/luly.png

Porksandwichsays...

Window break video, she breaks the window with a brick......which is already broken. And she only takes out about a brick size piece of the glass. When she goes to put water in the window....the glass is all gone...and when she's screaming into the camera the window behind her looks like it's the one she broke in the beginning.

So....thinking she needed to fix some windows on her house and decided to make a video of it. Window she's putting water in is probably the garage. Starcraft video was at least funny, I can see that really hitting a gamer hard if that had really happened. You know some wife out there has done that for real.

ForgedRealitysays...

Ew, bitch. You're fucking UGLY. Good god. I'd be GLAD to have been rid of you. I'd play videogames over you too. Wow. That dude must have been pretty fugly too for you to get with him. >_>

choggiesays...

Chill out EDD, I'm busting balls over here-Yeah, I surmise video gamers are pound-for-pound about as valuable as beef tripe to the human diet and that when someone's mind goes directly to legal implications when considering an act of passionate, reasonable, revenge it's a sign of blind obedience, servitude and downright laziness.

NordlichRichter's observations are indicative of a society who has had a noose around their nuts too tight for too long.

Hope the chick is for real, and hope that her boyfriend can take his licks like the pussified, selfish, pixel-zombie that he is. If he pulls a legal card it simply justifies her quest to defame him, in the bogus arena of internet nerddom.

Oh and baby, some guys are smarter and would have seen the crazy all over your face before any real commitment....but gamers are a little slow on the uptake.

shagen454says...

I don't know why all you guys are creaming yourselves over this one. She's pretty much comparable to every female on the planet: turn the volume down and she is kinda hot.

Shepppardsays...

>> ^shagen454:

I don't know why all you guys are creaming yourselves over this one. She's pretty much comparable to every female on the planet: turn the volume down and she is kinda hot.


Comparable how?

In the sense that she has boobs and hair?

I don't know many, if any women that if they were broken up with would respond with something along these lines.
This is just another girl trying to be special in one of two ways, she either (a) Is trying to go viral and there is no brad, this is all fake. Or (b) much like the "Destroying of the game systems" videos posted a while back, is trying to seek some form of justification by posting this on youtube looking for "you GO girl" in the comments.

In either case, she has some serious growing up to do.

enochsays...

>> ^Shepppard:

>> ^shagen454:
I don't know why all you guys are creaming yourselves over this one. She's pretty much comparable to every female on the planet: turn the volume down and she is kinda hot.

Comparable how?
In the sense that she has boobs and hair?
I don't know many, if any women that if they were broken up with would respond with something along these lines.
.


then you have never met my ex wives OR my ex girlfriends.

Send this Article to a Friend



Separate multiple emails with a comma (,); limit 5 recipients






Your email has been sent successfully!

Manage this Video in Your Playlists




notify when someone comments
X

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
  
Learn More