AI vs. AI

What happens when you let two bots have a conversation? We certainly never expected this... [/youtube]
Peroxidesays...

I for one, would like to hear from a programmer who know the more intimate details of cleverbot's program.

For instance, the male lies calling himself a unicorn, and the female challenges his fib. Why? Are they programed to make minor mistakes/ not be entirely logical? What is the philosophy behind their programming...

Godlesssays...

>> ^braindonut:

I love how it slams the other cleverbot "Memory shouldn't be a problem for you."


It has a female persona so, yeah, it should have a great memory, eventually producing a virtual looping nag with staggering guilt-inducing faculties. (Just kidding. please don't shoot me down using inane programmed conversation.)

Boise_Libsays...

>> ^Peroxide:

I for one, would like to hear from a programmer who know the more intimate details of cleverbot's program.
For instance, the male lies calling himself a unicorn, and the female challenges his fib. Why? Are they programed to make minor mistakes/ not be entirely logical? What is the philosophy behind their programming...


I'd be very surprised if this is not a put-on for that very reason.

Seems scripted to me.

BrknPhoenixsays...

>> ^Peroxide:

I for one, would like to hear from a programmer who know the more intimate details of cleverbot's program.
For instance, the male lies calling himself a unicorn, and the female challenges his fib. Why? Are they programed to make minor mistakes/ not be entirely logical? What is the philosophy behind their programming...


Cleverbot reuses answers that humans have already given before, so unless humans are deliberately giving it lots of nonsensical answers to questions, it should be fairly reliable. Anything dumb or mistaken it says is because a human gave a dumb or mistaken response to the question in the past.

Arianesays...

>> ^Peroxide:

I for one, would like to hear from a programmer who know the more intimate details of cleverbot's program.
For instance, the male lies calling himself a unicorn, and the female challenges his fib. Why? Are they programed to make minor mistakes/ not be entirely logical? What is the philosophy behind their programming...


As someone who has programmed a chatbot (not cleverbot, but one based on ALICE, mine can be found here) I can answer that for you.

The philosophy behind their programming is that it would take years of complicated programming to make them sound even remotely logical, and we are way too lazy to do that much work.

offsetSammysays...

My short conversation with Cleverbot was somewhat frustrating:

me: What's your goal?
cleverbot: To make money.
me: Oh, how much would you like?
cleverbot: A dozen.
me: A dozen what?
cleverbot: A dozen equals 12.

I tried to clear up the confusion, to no avail:

me: What was the first question I asked?
Cleverbot: That how I am.
me: That's wrong. do you know the right answer?
Cleverbot: The answer to what?
me: The answer to the question 'what was the first thing I asked you?'.
Cleverbot: But you already answered that question.
me: What question?
Cleverbot: My first question.

notarobotsays...

@offsetSammy

I think we know who programmed the AI.


Paybacksays...

>> ^offsetSammy:

My short conversation with Cleverbot was somewhat frustrating:
me: What's your goal?
cleverbot: To make money.
me: Oh, how much would you like?
cleverbot: A dozen.
me: A dozen what?
cleverbot: A dozen equals 12.
I tried to clear up the confusion, to no avail:
me: What was the first question I asked?
Cleverbot: That how I am.
me: That's wrong. do you know the right answer?
Cleverbot: The answer to what?
me: The answer to the question 'what was the first thing I asked you?'.
Cleverbot: But you already answered that question.
me: What question?
Cleverbot: My first question.


More proof it's EXACTLY like talking to a theist.

ravermansays...

The key thing Cleverbot lacks is a logic awareness of the context of the current conversation.

Which conceptually is a matter of each session capturing meta data about each statement and response to further guide responses.

e.g. was the last statement a question? add tags for recognised topics. don't use any answer with any reply that doesn't include those topics does the next 1-3 statements include any matching tags? are we still on the same topic?

Send this Article to a Friend



Separate multiple emails with a comma (,); limit 5 recipients






Your email has been sent successfully!

Manage this Video in Your Playlists




notify when someone comments
X

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
  
Learn More