What pi sounds like if the numbers are replaced with notes

surprisingly, it does sound like music.
zomgunicornssays...

Here is my comment on this as a music hobbyist:

At first it seems amazing, but really, the numbers are all placed on a scale, in this case the C scale. Scales are notes that sound musical and pleasing when played after each other. So even with Pi's set of numbers, in the musical sense, as long as it's within a scale, it will sound like music. If he were to exclude scales and place the numbers in a linear fashion on the piano, it would not sound like music. And by that, I mean, if the number 1 was C, number 2 was C#, number 3 was D, number 4 was D# and ect.

rottenseedsays...

Let's not forget 2 things:

1) Calling pi by anything other than π (pi), is unnecessary and imprecise and in most senses, mathematically irresponsible (ie, multiplying it out instead of leaving a number in terms of pi itself)

2) The attributes and relationships of pi are far overshadowed, by the sheer brilliance of the irrational number represented by the letter "e" (the base of natural log)

Nebosukesays...

>> ^zomgunicorns:

Here is my comment on this as a music hobbyist:
At first it seems amazing, but really, the numbers are all placed on a scale, in this case the C scale. Scales are notes that sound musical and pleasing when played after each other. So even with Pi's set of numbers, in the musical sense, as long as it's within a scale, it will sound like music. If he were to exclude scales and place the numbers in a linear fashion on the piano, it would not sound like music. And by that, I mean, if the number 1 was C, number 2 was C#, number 3 was D, number 4 was D# and ect.


He also used the numerical circle of fifths on a couple of the instruments, like the guitar and the zither. So mostly this was an exercise in arranging.

dannym3141says...

>> ^rottenseed:

Let's not forget 2 things:
1) Calling pi by anything other than π (pi), is unnecessary and imprecise and in most senses, mathematically irresponsible (ie, multiplying it out instead of leaving a number in terms of pi itself)
2) The attributes and relationships of pi are far overshadowed, by the sheer brilliance of the irrational number represented by the letter "e" (the base of natural log)


Pi's easier to get into though, as a gateway to e..

Sagemindsays...

(let's sing along...)
This would be the "Song that never ends...

And it goes on and on my friends,
Somebody started playing it, not knowing what what it was,
And they'll continue playing it forever just because...

It is the song that never ends...

berticussays...

WHATEVER NERD!
>> ^rottenseed:

Let's not forget 2 things:
1) Calling pi by anything other than π (pi), is unnecessary and imprecise and in most senses, mathematically irresponsible (ie, multiplying it out instead of leaving a number in terms of pi itself)
2) The attributes and relationships of pi are far overshadowed, by the sheer brilliance of the irrational number represented by the letter "e" (the base of natural log)

Jinxsays...

>> ^raverman:

Put your speakers out the window.
Pump it up to full volume.
Watch the UFO's roll on in...

They'd have to have knowledge of our scales. They could prolly work it out but our best chance would be equal intervals. Oh, and probably radio waves would travel a lil further

ridesallyridencsays...

Kind of. They used the chromatic scale, i.e., every whole note between C and C. Unlike scales such as the major, minor, etc., the chromatic scale is sequential, and not built on nice sounds. You can make a LOT of bad-sounding combinations by picking notes from that scale, whereas pretty much all the notes from other scales sound good together musically.


>> ^zomgunicorns:

Here is my comment on this as a music hobbyist:
At first it seems amazing, but really, the numbers are all placed on a scale, in this case the C scale. Scales are notes that sound musical and pleasing when played after each other. So even with Pi's set of numbers, in the musical sense, as long as it's within a scale, it will sound like music. If he were to exclude scales and place the numbers in a linear fashion on the piano, it would not sound like music. And by that, I mean, if the number 1 was C, number 2 was C#, number 3 was D, number 4 was D# and ect.

spoco2says...

Dang... wish he'd stopped at 30 decimal places, as that's what I know pi to by heart.

Yup, I forget fricken everything, but a competition in high school to win a 'pie for a pi' got me to remember it that far, and I still do.

3.141592653589793238462643383279

My friend (who was my friend in high school and now works at the desk next to me... freaky) knows it to 31... the dick

Ornthoronsays...

>> ^rottenseed:

Let's not forget 2 things:
1) Calling pi by anything other than π (pi), is unnecessary and imprecise and in most senses, mathematically irresponsible (ie, multiplying it out instead of leaving a number in terms of pi itself)
2) The attributes and relationships of pi are far overshadowed, by the sheer brilliance of the irrational number represented by the letter "e" (the base of natural log)


Not to mention that π isn't even the correct circle constant.

Send this Article to a Friend



Separate multiple emails with a comma (,); limit 5 recipients






Your email has been sent successfully!

Manage this Video in Your Playlists




notify when someone comments
X

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
  
Learn More