I wonder what point they where trying to get across?

That your a stupid fuck and you don't know how anything works so why bother?

Pretty sure the point was bossoms

Yeah tits is about all I got out of that one. Magic!

I know how, it works... and you should know how it works.

To understand what it means when that information leaves your network.

Its not a complicated process, but its a process that you should know.

Tags for this video have been changed from 'internet, email, magic' to 'internet, email, magic, boobies, thumbnail boobies' - edited by JTZ

Tags for this video have been changed from 'internet, email, magic, boobies, thumbnail boobies' to 'internet, email, magic, boobies, thumbnail boobies, bewbes' - edited by JTZ

>> ^NordlichReiter:
I know how, it works... and you should know how it works.
To understand what it means when that information leaves your network.
Its not a complicated process, but its a process that you should know.


You mean... it's not magic?

They were talking?

I tell you what is magic, cleavage. It actually got me to watch this whole crappy marketing video. Stupid magic.

>> ^Duckman33:
>> ^NordlichReiter:
I know how, it works... and you should know how it works.
To understand what it means when that information leaves your network.
Its not a complicated process, but its a process that you should know.

You mean... it's not magic?


No my student! Its not magic! It is (DUM DUM DUM) 2(31/\/(3

its not magic, it is all done with modern things like lasers and hydraulics.

Does anyone really know how the TCP/IP network interface "magically" sends packets of information across the "magical" fiber optic?

I thought it was a series of tubes?
Either these bimbos are wrong, or Ted Stevens is.

I have clicked my mouse 3 times and im still on this page and have not received any money from my new business please help

>> ^Duckman33:
You mean... it's not magic?


Anyone who's ever been an Exchange admin can tell you there's plenty of magic involved... black magic.

Please, please, please stop voting for this video! Please?

but it's magically delicious

I disapprove of this video's blatant objectification of women. I would never submit anything like this.

MAGIC!

pfft magic.

There's no magic involved, anyone who's really in the know, knows that it's "Kung Fu" that makes the interwebs work.

>> ^CaptainPlanet420:
I disapprove of this video's blatant objectification of women. I would never submit anything like this.


... how about one with blatant subjectification of women?

>> ^thepinky:
Please, please, please stop voting for this video! Please?


OK, I almost sprayed a mouth full of water all over my laptop when I read this comment. LOL Upvote just to feed the troll.

Comment hidden because you are ignoring dag.(show it anyway)

This is how we created VideoSift - ask Lucky - just three mouse clicks and viola!

what the gorgeous women didn't tell you is the website you create sells illegal narcotics, and child slaves.

... but still, three clicks and you're making money!

But but but...how was that troll-like in the least? Disagreement does not automatically make me a troll. It was a sincere request. I dislike this video and I could see the top 15 coming.

Let me explain myself. I disagree with CaptainPlanet420 that this is blatant objectification of women. It really isn't. This video bothers me because it is so seldom that we see videos of women on the Sift that it bothers me when the only ones to make the top 15 usually involve tags that say "boobies" or "cute chick." These women are acting like idiots and their only apparent value is their cleavage.

Granted, if these two people were shirtless men I would probably laugh and upvote. I admit it. But that's because men get sifted all of the time for merits of the mind whereas women who make the top 15 are usually hot, scantily clad, or incredibly stupid.

>> ^djsunkid:
>> ^thepinky:
Please, please, please stop voting for this video! Please?

OK, I almost sprayed a mouth full of water all over my laptop when I read this comment. LOL Upvote just to feed the troll.

ahahahaha MAGIC!

actually Ted Stevens was spot on.. he said it's an interconnected series of _boobs_

Oh, I know exactly why you don't want people to vote on it. Your request above doesn't make you a troll, but you've been SUCH a troll in the past, it made me totally LOL imagining your head explode watching this video.

BTW when are you going to respond to demonym7's scathing refutation of your Pornography post?

>> ^thepinky:
But but but...how was that troll-like in the least? Disagreement does not automatically make me a troll. It was a sincere request. I dislike this video and I could see the top 15 coming.
Let me explain myself. I disagree with CaptainPlanet420 that this is blatant objectification of women. It really isn't. This video bothers me because it is so seldom that we see videos of women on the Sift that it bothers me when the only ones to make the top 15 usually involve tags that say "boobies" or "cute chick." These women are acting like idiots and their only apparent value is their cleavage.
Granted, if these two people were shirtless men I would probably laugh and upvote. I admit it. But that's because men get sifted all of the time for merits of the mind whereas women who make the top 15 are usually hot, scantily clad, or incredibly stupid.
>> ^djsunkid:
>> ^thepinky:
Please, please, please stop voting for this video! Please?

OK, I almost sprayed a mouth full of water all over my laptop when I read this comment. LOL Upvote just to feed the troll.

>> ^thepinky:
This video bothers me because it is so seldom that we see videos of women on the Sift that it bothers me when the only ones to make the top 15 usually involve tags that say "boobies" or "cute chick." These women are acting like idiots and their only apparent value is their cleavage.

I'll stop upvoting when you stop being stupid and having tits...

(not you specifically, I don't know if you have tits or not)

Jesus magically puts the web page on the Internets for you. It just gets pushed through a bunch of tubes, routed through heaven for a good vetting and inclusion into the Google search engine... sprinkled with magical water, sparky fingers, and when it is deemed to be coated in magical goodness, it is finally posted on the Internets.

The Net : A Series of tubes - choc full of porn and magic!

>> ^thepinky:
But but but...how was that troll-like in the least? Disagreement does not automatically make me a troll. It was a sincere request. I dislike this video and I could see the top 15 coming.
Let me explain myself. I disagree with CaptainPlanet420 that this is blatant objectification of women. It really isn't. This video bothers me because it is so seldom that we see videos of women on the Sift that it bothers me when the only ones to make the top 15 usually involve tags that say "boobies" or "cute chick." These women are acting like idiots and their only apparent value is their cleavage.
Granted, if these two people were shirtless men I would probably laugh and upvote. I admit it. But that's because men get sifted all of the time for merits of the mind whereas women who make the top 15 are usually hot, scantily clad, or incredibly stupid.
>> ^djsunkid:
>> ^thepinky:
Please, please, please stop voting for this video! Please?

OK, I almost sprayed a mouth full of water all over my laptop when I read this comment. LOL Upvote just to feed the troll.


But the point of this video on the sift is not the objectification of women, but rather the hilarity of "magical" internets. You're taking it out of context and misrepresenting your cause.

^the boobs are just a coincidence.

Is this not *terrible?

Adding video to channels (Terrible) - requested by Deano.

I thought it was powered by ball bearings nowadays.

but how do i EMAIL you?

>> ^dag:
This is how we created VideoSift - ask Lucky - just three mouse clicks and viola!

It's not magic, it's an ILLUSION!

>But but but...how was that troll-like in the least?


Wow. I don't know thepinky -- I'm not on here enough to figure out personalities. However, I thought thepinky's original comment was just fine, the defense of the original comment logical, and the downvoting on that comment pretty weird.

I'm with you, thepinky. This video was not particularly funny and not worth the upvote.

I upvoted because I'm actually trying to start a web biz and I helped a friend try to get her own started and I wish like hell I could start making money as "magically" as this obvious scam claims.

Unless you're an SEO guru, or damn lucky, I can't see any way to make a living online unless you start shelling out some bucks for some serious advertising.

>> ^thepinky:
But but but...how was that troll-like in the least? Disagreement does not automatically make me a troll. It was a sincere request. I dislike this video and I could see the top 15 coming.
Let me explain myself. I disagree with CaptainPlanet420 that this is blatant objectification of women. It really isn't. This video bothers me because it is so seldom that we see videos of women on the Sift that it bothers me when the only ones to make the top 15 usually involve tags that say "boobies" or "cute chick." These women are acting like idiots and their only apparent value is their cleavage.
Granted, if these two people were shirtless men I would probably laugh and upvote. I admit it. But that's because men get sifted all of the time for merits of the mind whereas women who make the top 15 are usually hot, scantily clad, or incredibly stupid.
>> ^djsunkid:
>> ^thepinky:
Please, please, please stop voting for this video! Please?

OK, I almost sprayed a mouth full of water all over my laptop when I read this comment. LOL Upvote just to feed the troll.


Well if it makes you feel better, I upvoted it not because they are women and they are "hawt" etc etc, I personally find the hyper sexualising of advertisement incredibly disgusting, but that is not the point, I upvoted it because its incredibly stupid, and it would have still earned my vote if it was 2 men featured in the video being incredibly stupid.

Also point me to these video's of women being amazingly clever, and have been neglected and I will upvote them, I'm not saying that there aren't any, I'm just saying that I haven't found them.

... I just noticed that last shot, where the websites and the money are just spraying out of the computer screen... lol

>> ^bamdrew:
... I just noticed that last shot, where the websites and the money are just spraying out of the computer screen... lol


That's probably an accurate depiction of the nightly dreams of Google executives.

>> ^rottenseed:
>> ^thepinky:
This video bothers me because it is so seldom that we see videos of women on the Sift that it bothers me when the only ones to make the top 15 usually involve tags that say "boobies" or "cute chick." These women are acting like idiots and their only apparent value is their cleavage.

I'll stop upvoting when you stop being stupid and having tits...
(not you specifically, I don't know if you have tits or not)


She totally does and they are very sweet... in this picture I drew.

Is this Palin's cousin?


>> ^Kerotan:
I wonder what point they where trying to get across?
That your a stupid fuck and you don't know how anything works so why bother?


"you're"

>> ^dag:
This is how we created VideoSift - ask Lucky - just three mouse clicks and viola!


Wait, is there a secret super-charter membership that gives you access to the viola?

>> ^Krupo:
Is this Palin's cousin?

>> ^Kerotan:
I wonder what point they where trying to get across?
That your a stupid fuck and you don't know how anything works so why bother?

"you're"
>> ^dag:
This is how we created VideoSift - ask Lucky - just three mouse clicks and viola!

Wait, is there a secret super-charter membership that gives you access to the viola?


The lack of an edit function comes back to haunt me.

Forget about the three clicks, Dag's and Lucky's man-racks almost defy gravity.

It makes me LOL to imagine you LOL-ing imagining my head exploding while watching this video.

In all honesty, I stopped reading the comments on the porn post a LONG time ago. The reason being that people were insulting me personally and it started getting to me. And there was such an avalanche of opposition that I read those comments and felt helpless and discouraged in the face of everyone's personal opinions about why porn is wonderful. Deedub81 has been more much effective in providing scientific evidence against porn than I have. My argument was weak and underdeveloped.

>> ^djsunkid:
Oh, I know exactly why you don't want people to vote on it. Your request above doesn't make you a troll, but you've been SUCH a troll in the past, it made me totally LOL imagining your head explode watching this video.
BTW when are you going to respond to demonym7's scathing refutation of your Pornography post?
>> ^thepinky:
But but but...how was that troll-like in the least? Disagreement does not automatically make me a troll. It was a sincere request. I dislike this video and I could see the top 15 coming.
Let me explain myself. I disagree with CaptainPlanet420 that this is blatant objectification of women. It really isn't. This video bothers me because it is so seldom that we see videos of women on the Sift that it bothers me when the only ones to make the top 15 usually involve tags that say "boobies" or "cute chick." These women are acting like idiots and their only apparent value is their cleavage.
Granted, if these two people were shirtless men I would probably laugh and upvote. I admit it. But that's because men get sifted all of the time for merits of the mind whereas women who make the top 15 are usually hot, scantily clad, or incredibly stupid.
>> ^djsunkid:
>> ^thepinky:
Please, please, please stop voting for this video! Please?

OK, I almost sprayed a mouth full of water all over my laptop when I read this comment. LOL Upvote just to feed the troll.

I'm sorry. I'm honestly making an effort not to be a troll anymore. I'm sorry if I appeared that way.

Allow me to whine for a sec. I get 8 downvotes for asking you guys not to vote for this video, but this innappropriate and demeaning comment gets upvoted by the same people who downvoted mine? That's weak.

>> ^rottenseed:
>> ^thepinky:
This video bothers me because it is so seldom that we see videos of women on the Sift that it bothers me when the only ones to make the top 15 usually involve tags that say "boobies" or "cute chick." These women are acting like idiots and their only apparent value is their cleavage.

I'll stop upvoting when you stop being stupid and having tits...(not you specifically, I don't know if you have tits or not)

You really need to relax and stop taking everything so seriously. The women who made this weren't exploited. They were compensated for their performance and I'm sure they had a great time. They paid for those breast implants, they want to look like that, and they want people to notice them. That's not objectification, it's marketing. Pick another battle. Meanwhile, chill out and learn to laugh.

Yeah, I would have upvoted, too. This became a much bigger deal than it was meant to be. I never upvote videos with boobies tags. There is nothing especially special about this one. I really don't have a huge objection. My second post was not a diatribe, it was simply an explanation of my first post, and my first post wasn't meant to cause a stir.

>> ^Kerotan:
Well if it makes you feel better, I upvoted it not because they are women and they are "hawt" etc etc, I personally find the hyper sexualising of advertisement incredibly disgusting, but that is not the point, I upvoted it because its incredibly stupid, and it would have still earned my vote if it was 2 men featured in the video being incredibly stupid.
Also point me to these video's of women being amazingly clever, and have been neglected and I will upvote them, I'm not saying that there aren't any, I'm just saying that I haven't found them.

It's a personal thing, bareboards. My reputation encourages people to downvote even my harmless comments. Apparently I deserve it, but thanks anyway.

>> ^bareboards:
>But but but...how was that troll-like in the least?
Wow. I don't know thepinky -- I'm not on here enough to figure out personalities. However, I thought thepinky's original comment was just fine, the defense of the original comment logical, and the downvoting on that comment pretty weird.
I'm with you, thepinky. This video was not particularly funny and not worth the upvote.

Wow. That comment is not okay.

>> ^gwiz665:
She totally does and they are very sweet... in this picture I drew.

You're misrepresenting my cause, too. I just said that this video is NOT objectification of women. But you're right. This video is mildly amusing and not very offensive at all. I just have a personal problem with boobies tags and videos that make #3 because of cleavage.

Aaargh! I'm sorry. Why do I even try? It's not even a big deal. Carry on.

>> ^poolcleaner:
But the point of this video on the sift is not the objectification of women, but rather the hilarity of "magical" internets. You're taking it out of context and misrepresenting your cause.

Alright, alright! I will come out of the closet and jump on this shark! It was me who added the tags, dystopianfuturetoday had nothing to do with it. And he, I am sure simply wanted to show the hilarity of the content. Now I on the other hand always find it amusing that all the internet clip always would feature some sort of cleavage shot what not to gain views. I laugh at it a lot and I also know it works. Truth is sex sells, and that work both ways for both genders. I was being funny when I tagged it that way, it was as you could say for the "Lolz". By no means do I mean to be offensive nor objectifying women.

OR maybe I just really love BOOBIES!!!!

Please, please, please stop trying to help the image of women on the sift. Please?
That is all.

>> ^thepinky:
Please, please, please stop voting for this video! Please?

I feel like Chris What-his-name, of the infamous Britney defense video.

Just leave thepinky alone! Why can't you just leave thepinky alone!??!!!

She had an opinion, she stated it cleanly, defended it coherently, and man, what a pile-on!

I get that maybe she says things like this all the time -- and why shouldn't she? Nothing has changed, and the huge upvote for a mildly amusing video is proof of that. The ensuing pile-on if further proof.

Hang in there, thepinky. I'm with you.

Sure, it's true I like to think of myself as a warlock of sorts. Before the snazzy 3 click method to create VideoSift I used to close my eyes and meditate with my finger tips just barely touching my laptop as if on a Ouija board. When I opened my eyes a website of my very own magically appeared as if by some kind of magical magic.

Some more spiritual people begged with me to stop, that I was toying with evil forces beyond my understanding and that great harm would befall me and my kin. But nay, I scoffed at them insisting Lord SiftBot vowed to cast a spell of protection with a level 72 potion. To this day and for all the rest I sleep with one eye open waiting, anticipating...

God, our threads are so fucking philosophical all of the time.

It's a funny video about morons. It would be funny if they were in parkas. Actually, it would be funnier if they were in parkas, because that would make no sense at all.

Well I upvoted because I like magic :[

1. Don't understand shit.
2. Tits!
3. ???
4. Profit!

Aww... *dead by terms of use violation.

This published video has been declared non-functional; embed code must be fixed within 2 days or it will be sent to the dead pool - declared dead by DavidRaine.

Awarding rasch187 with one Power Point for fixing this video's dead embed code.

Tags for this video have been changed from 'internet, email, magic, boobies, thumbnail boobies, bewbes' to 'internet, email, magic, boobies, thumbnail boobies, bewbs' - edited by calvados

for the purpose of discussion on the topic

Double-Promoting this video back to the front page; last published Tuesday, November 18th, 2008 5:36am PST - doublepromote requested by GDGD.

*length=34

The duration of this video has been updated from unknown to 34 secs - length declared by GDGD.

Sex will no longer be used to sell things on the day that women are no longer willing to sell themselves. I would suggest that the mythical 'hell' will have well and truly frozen over first.

*dead

This video has been declared non-functional; embed code must be fixed within 2 days or it will be sent to the dead pool - declared dead by luxury_pie.