2 girls impress guys by shaking their asses wildly

It's the video bareboards2 doesn't want you to see! See it now!

It's the female equivalent of this gem: http://videosift.com/video/5-Dudes-Try-To-Impress-the-Ladies-by-Gangbanging-An-Ottoman
BoneRemakesays...

>> ^gwiz665:

This was sabotaged by a very quick downvote, so it lingered at 0 for a long time.
I'll get it through eventually, don't you worry.


By sabotage you mean being the second to vote and being consistent? if so, sure! I sabotaged it then.

bareboards2says...

I didn't downvote the original, but now I gotta downvote this one.

Time to call in The Women, though, if you are calling in your posse (posse, jiggy, who the heck do I think I'm kidding?)

So I haven't discussed this with any of these amazing women....

But a scientific experiment has been in progress on this, to quote @Fusionaut, foul video.

We need some downvotes to show these guys that Women Can Roar around here, too!

@Lann, @Issykitty, @peggedbea, @AdrianBlack, @MikesHL13, @inflatablevagina, @taranimator

And then there are the men who I know love women.... (the guys upvoting this vid love women, too, I know... this is just for fun)

@BoneRemake has already chimed in, @kymbos, @dystopianfuturetoday, @radx

It's a downvote party!

So given that this is the vid I didn't want anyone to see, I have now called all these people to see it.

By definition, you win, Gwiz!

GenjiKilpatricksays...

Well, at first I was tempted to upvote. Tho I had to downvote on a matter of principle.
There really is no point to this video, and I abhor crap like this clogging up the sift.

[I long for the days of Summer 2006 when I could easily find an intriguing political video to rant about or be captivated by a stunning new science vid or chuckle at the quick, 10 second 'fail' video submission]

However.. Gwiz, in his infinite penile wisdom, offered us all a second opinion.

It was only upon further review of previously unseen footage ..

was I forced to re-evaluate the quality of this submission. = D

[As evidenced by my avatar, I hold a ..large.. appreciation for the wiles of the feminine form.
= P ]
>> ^bareboards2:

Traitor!!!!
You downvoted Azz Bounce but you vote for Gwiz's post of the EXACT SAME VIDEO???
This whole thing amuses me to no end.

bareboards2says...

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!

You must concede though that it took extra effort and attention.

What is that physics thing? That just by observing you change the thing observed?

@Fusionaut, this science experiment has sucked since I first conceived it.

Fusionautsays...

Let us weigh the merits of this video. This video is all about two girls dancing. The dance is a style that you would obviously find in a dance club. The style is boring as hell to watch yet it would take practice and dedication to master. (if you would argue otherwise, just give it a try! ). Although this dance is of a sexual nature I do not find it sexy at all but sexiness is in the eye of the beholder, or whatever other organ it may be in. Because of this I submit that these girls made this video to document and showcase their boring as hell yet difficult dance skills, possibly for bragging rights. I find it no more shocking than old videos of Elvis 'gyrating' back in the day. Also, I am sure that "AZZ DANCE" practitioners and connoisseurs would appreciate this video in the same way that fly fishers like watching videos of people fly fishing.

Another component of this video is the text bubbles that pop up. They seem to me to be mocking the video itself and poking fun at the dance. This is why I upvoted since it made me laugh. Fuk dem soks lol.

These girls have the resources to film themselves, the freedom to dance in any way they choose, the ability to publicize their dance so that people from all over the world can discuss the "redeeming value" of it all, and above all they have freedom of expression through dance. That is why you should upvote this video and that is why I'm going to give it a *quality. Censorship be damned!

gwiz665says...

I didn't call anyone. I have people do that for me.
>> ^bareboards2:

Hey Gwiz, I think we broke the Sift....
Nobody you called to come vote showed up. And Mike didn't get my call....
I wonder if there is a maximum on the number of people you can copy in a comment.

Fusionautsays...

So you are making a judgement based on how they look? Specifically, by the culture that they appear to belong to? All the more reason this video needed to sift.>> ^chilaxe:

>> ^Fusionaut:
You're assuming that they are poor and unemployed. I see no indication that they are either. >> ^chilaxe:
You earn less because you're paying for their welfare benefits, Idiocracy-style.


Probabilistic correlations can be drawn from indicators of sub-cultures.

tacotimesays...

They can't grasp the booty shaking, mind you I don't think anybody could hold onto that.

>> ^shagen454:

I just cannot understand why pseudo-intellectuals would not be interested in some good ol' smoothed out booty shaking; Indeed, I find this to be quite fascinating.

bareboards2says...

@chileax, allow me to draw your attention to the fence. That is one fine and well maintained fence. Gwiz noticed it immediately on the first vid. The grass is well maintained.

So.... poor and unemployed is your conclusion because.... dancing? Employed people dance.

What could it be, chileax, what could it be that led you to the conclusion of welfare recipient?

I don't like this vid because it's stupid. I dislike your comment about this video down to marrow of my bones.

chilaxesays...

@bareboards2

Gut feelings, dislikes, and the opinions of our bones seem to be more about instincts and yuck factors than about science.

Most people who dance like this probably read less news than even Sarah Palin. It's extraordinary that that statement is verboten, and it's unlikely we'll get people to reduce their personal intelligence for the sake of those norms, if that's what people are implying we should do.

bareboards2says...

But you can't watch it and you can't fix it so it can be watched.

"Dead" is not dead, it's resting.

"Killed" is the real dead.

It's like the tax code -- complicated but there is logic in there!


>> ^GDGD:

@dag @gwiz665 @bareboards2
So, even though the original was killed, it still exists on the site a week later? Urge to declare dupe. SO CONFUSED.

Send this Article to a Friend



Separate multiple emails with a comma (,); limit 5 recipients






Your email has been sent successfully!

Manage this Video in Your Playlists




notify when someone comments
X

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
  
Learn More