What should I choose as a channel?

  (10 votes)
  (3 votes)
  (1 vote)
  (3 votes)
  (4 votes)
  (2 votes)
  (2 votes)

A total of 25 votes have been cast on this poll.


Thinking of a new channel, and these came to mind. Any suggestions?
Sagemind says...

My advice is only pick one that you are willing to check every time you come to the Sift.

Make sure it's something you have an interest in. I know many people have fallen into the trap of picking something the Sift really needs but then it becomes burdensome as your interest in the subject matter wanes.

Just because it's a great idea and the Sift needs it doesn't mean it needs to be your channel.
Pick wisely.

dag says...

Comment hidden because you are ignoring dag. (show it anyway)

I'm afraid it would get used synonymously with "terrible". >> ^NetRunner:

Isn't "business" already covered sufficiently by the money channel?
I voted "detestable" -- I've got a feeling that would get a lot of use going into an election season.

NetRunner says...

>> ^dag:

I'm afraid it would get used synonymously with "terrible". >> ^NetRunner:
Isn't "business" already covered sufficiently by the money channel?
I voted "detestable" -- I've got a feeling that would get a lot of use going into an election season.



I would hope so! I would use the terrible channel we have now, except its owner wanted it to only be used on poorly done artistic content, not to denote that the actions in the video are detestable.

If we make the terrible channel mean anything terrible, then I'd go for contrarian.

ChaosEngine says...

I think business, detestable and contrarian are pretty much covered by money, terrible and controversy.

Black or biography would be interesting
>> ^NetRunner:

>> ^dag:
I'm afraid it would get used synonymously with "terrible". >> ^NetRunner:
Isn't "business" already covered sufficiently by the money channel?
I voted "detestable" -- I've got a feeling that would get a lot of use going into an election season.


I would hope so! I would use the terrible channel we have now, except its owner wanted it to only be used on poorly done artistic content, not to denote that the actions in the video are detestable.
If we make the terrible channel mean anything terrible, then I'd go for contrarian.

NetRunner says...

>> ^ChaosEngine:

I think business, detestable and contrarian are pretty much covered by money, terrible and controversy.
Black or biography would be interesting
>> ^NetRunner:
>> ^dag:
I'm afraid it would get used synonymously with "terrible". >> ^NetRunner:
Isn't "business" already covered sufficiently by the money channel?
I voted "detestable" -- I've got a feeling that would get a lot of use going into an election season.


I would hope so! I would use the terrible channel we have now, except its owner wanted it to only be used on poorly done artistic content, not to denote that the actions in the video are detestable.
If we make the terrible channel mean anything terrible, then I'd go for contrarian.



Black is covered by equality, biography by history, purple by music, griot by cinema/books/bravo, etc.

Though I disagree about detestable and contrarian. Detestable would be overlapping with terrible if terrible's terrible definition didn't exclude the detestable.

Contrarian is worlds apart from controversy -- Controversy is "Newt's wife says he wanted an Open Marriage", while contrarian is "Actually, inflation would help the economy right now because it would reduce the real value of people's debts..." The former is controversial, but not contrarian, the latter is contrarian but not actually controversial (amongst economists, anyways).

It's a bit of a niche channel, but it's a niche Videosift's community likes to hang out in.

longde says...

For business, I think it would focus on business models, strategy, organizations, office politics, and business processes rather than money and economics. So it would be slightly different than money.

I think the overlap of black and equality is minimal. Maybe calling it "Africana" would clarify things.

I think a few people highlighted the issues with Terrible. Maybe calling Detestable Asshole or jerk would help reduce confusion.

I think biography and history have the potential for overlap. But there are many individual stories that happened in the past that I would not necessarily call historical. And many modern biographies.

xxovercastxx says...

>> ^dag:

I'm afraid it would get used synonymously with "terrible". >> ^NetRunner:
Isn't "business" already covered sufficiently by the money channel?
I voted "detestable" -- I've got a feeling that would get a lot of use going into an election season.



#terrible is Evil Dead, not The Holocaust. I'm disheartened that even the SiftLord isn't aware of this.

longde says...

Looks like one choice stands out. Please comment on my take on an *Africana channel:

Africana is:

-Culture, History, Politics, Philosophy, Technology, & News of Africa and her Diaspora
-about Northern and Sub-saharan Africans of all races, and diaspora members
-Geological and Geographic Africa
-Travel within Africa, or within diaspora communities
-Individual stories that speak to the unique cultural experience of Africans & diaspora members


Africana is not:

-Insulting animations or images of black people
-People behaving badly towards black people
-Any old video with a black person in it that does not speak to larger issues of culture, history,
etc (e.g., some black dude just washing his car)
-racist or disproven theories about black people
-Black sports, movie, or music stars, unless they have made a very significant social/cultural impact
-Videos whose central theme is race or racism, and not Africana as defined above

Send this Article to a Friend



Separate multiple emails with a comma (,); limit 5 recipients






Your email has been sent successfully!

Manage this Video in Your Playlists

Beggar's Canyon