Dude, *WTF?!?!?!

Why does the opening title credits look like someone's squeezing out a tampon onto paper, why do they keep calling it an opening between the legs instead of a vag and who knows why I'm utterly compelled to *promote this?

Promoting this video and sending it back into the queue for one more try; last queued Monday, February 7th, 2011 6:22am PST - promote requested by alien_concept.

Adding video to channels (Wtf) - requested by alien_concept.

Women bleed like this? And yet somehow survive? That's unpossible!

Kill them with fire!

I just don't trust anything that that bleeds for a week and doesn't die.

Comment hidden because you are ignoring dag.(show it anyway)

Wow, an amazing little artefact. The repetition reminds of those "Head On" commercials. Someone needs to make a mash-up - "Apply directly to the opening between my legs."

Apply directly to the opening between my legs.
Apply directly to the opening between my legs.
Apply directly to the opening between my legs.
Apply directly to the opening between my legs.
Apply directly to the opening between my legs.

Feel sorry for that little girl... her parents must be related.

Is this a leaked alpha trailer from a new The Hills Have Eyes sequel?

I nearly started crying.

Is she petting a large tampon at the end?

Spit-take

>> ^honkeytonk73:

Feel sorry for that little girl... her parents must be related.


Your ignorance is astonishing, sir. I leave you with this:

http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/down-syndrome/DS00182/DSECTION=causes
http://pediatrics.about.com/od/birthdefects/f/down_syn_causes.htm

Good day.

Thanks, I really didn't need to see a woman hike up her skirt, pull down her panties and show me a bloody tampon right now.

Wait, I have two openings down there.

Which one should be bleeding?

>> ^Gallowflak:

I nearly started crying.


Don't you mean tears from inside your body nearly came outside from the openings between your eyes?

I saw a video years ago that was meant to teach mentally retarded children about sex. I wonder if this is part of the same series.

eat a dick

>> ^honkeytonk73:

Feel sorry for that little girl... her parents must be related.

the repetition and the fact that it stars a child with down syndrome, and that they felt compelled to show the ladies pad make me feel like it is.


>> ^Efflixi:

I saw a video years ago that was meant to teach mentally retarded children about sex. I wonder if this is part of the same series.

downvote for this comment thread.

Didn't realize this could be a video aimed at the mentally challenged such as down syndrome. I just thought it may be a horribly executed sex-ed video from days gone past. Now that it's mentioned and I think back (don't feel the need to re-watch), I realize that this may be exactly what it is.

As to Honkytonk's comment above - it was funny when it was just a poorly executed video - but becomes unfunny once you realize she actually is "challenged". I don't know why that is though. In fact, it shouldn't be funny at all - it must be the absurdness of the content when we view it out of context.

I don't think the up-votes are from people laughing at a how-to clip aimed at challenged children. I think we laugh because we assume it's aimed at regular intelligenced people made by less intelligent people (in this case, the film-makers).

I'll just choose not to vote on this one...

What was the creep factor purpose for that whole random girl pets dog segment? CREEEEPY!

>> ^jimnms:

Thanks, I really didn't need to see a woman hike up her skirt, pull down her panties and show me a bloody tampon right now.


Well, that's ok because it wasn't a tampon, it was a pad, big difference.

Tampons are INSERTED into the vagina and absorb the blood and swell up
A Pad is worn OUTSIDE the vagina and catches any blood that leaks out of the vagina.

another entry from wtf world

to capture the attention of the target audience.


sometimes, videosift is a spellcheck away from being youtube.
sometimes, i fucking hate you all. >> ^shagen454:

What was the creep factor purpose for that whole random girl pets dog segment? CREEEEPY!

Methinks, that some people 'methink' too hard about a video. We and you know why it got upvotes.

If you have the inside scoop to save-the-Universe™ then you should: get a job as a librarian and start shooshing the hell out of people even if they whisper (it says NO NOISE; except the loud shooshing of course), and then destroy some kids mp3 player while they're playing b-ball that was playing vulgar rap, and then pull out a ghetto blaster and pop in some Mozart. That's the way it should be.

This video to me needs no "I'm sorry I didn't immediately come to the conclusion that it could be meant for something else!" or "Jeez, I just thought it was a straightforward media screw up. I'm sorry I didn't notice in time, send me to the Gulag...".

Perception "preceptions".

Remember: Clowns see a balloon and think of ways to tie it into knots for children. Scientists see a balloon and wonder how it can blow up without popping, and then why and how it does pop.

Why is this "perception injunction" getting more popular on Videosift? Then people feel a need (or inclined) to apologize? It's one thing to point it out, it's another to demand (nearly) that all that made no such distinction, on a video from the Internet with no pre-context found to be amusing out of context, demands a "morale force brigade" to harangue anyone involved in this obvious malfeasance by the "Sifties" of the Videosift upvoting public.

Shame on us. Shame on us !

(*goes back to watching "Whose Line Is It" clips...*)

This was my reaction to watching this video. Yes, I threw up a bit in my mouth, then couldn't contain it and sprayed it across the poor girl in front me, who, as it happens, had blood from the inside of her body coming outside from an opening between her legs.