Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
15 Comments
newtboysays...*insert joke about milking my nuts here*
Funny enough, right as I started watching this, a report came on the news about a recall of Blue Diamond almond milk because it may contain.....wait for it.....MILK!
Mordhausjokingly says...You can milk anything with a nipple.
eric3579says...*promote
siftbotsays...Promoting this video and sending it back into the queue for one more try; last queued Friday, August 3rd, 2018 2:20pm PDT - promote requested by eric3579.
JiggaJonsonsays...I think it's fair for the dairy industry to lobby for this. It's an argument of definition.
You make almond milk basically by taking almonds and blending them up with water then straining.
They could call it "milk-substitute" perhaps. Point being, it's not the same thing as milk from a cow.
Peanut butter went through a similar episode in history when Jif added a bunch of crap that wasn't peanuts to its mix.
"Jif, in an effort to overtake Skippy and Peter Pan, added sweeteners and reduced their actual peanut content to improve the flavor and increase the profit margin. According to a lab study (granted, by a lab run by Skippy’s parent company, Best Foods), Jif peanut butter contained 25 percent hydrogenated oil and only 75 percent actual peanuts. This greatly concerned the FDA and other consumer groups."
http://www.todayifoundout.com/index.php/2014/12/food-labels-peanut-butter-hearings/
Today, you can't call a product "peanut butter" unless it's made of at least 90 percent ground up peanuts. Otherwise it has to be labeled "peanut-spread."
See also: Pringles are not "chips" they are "potato-crisps" http://www.todayifoundout.com/index.php/2012/04/the-inventor-of-the-pringles-can-was-buried-in-one/
smrsays...Great point! We should change all mentions of peanut BUTTER to peanut SPREAD. Butter is a dairy product. These nuts keep horning in on the dairy business! And with apple butter, the fruits are getting in on the game, too!
I think it's fair for the dairy industry to lobby for this. It's an argument of definition.
You make almond milk basically by taking almonds and blending them up with water then straining.
They could call it "milk-substitute" perhaps. Point being, it's not the same thing as milk from a cow.
Peanut butter went through a similar episode in history when Jif added a bunch of crap that wasn't peanuts to its mix.
"Jif, in an effort to overtake Skippy and Peter Pan, added sweeteners and reduced their actual peanut content to improve the flavor and increase the profit margin. According to a lab study (granted, by a lab run by Skippy’s parent company, Best Foods), Jif peanut butter contained 25 percent hydrogenated oil and only 75 percent actual peanuts. This greatly concerned the FDA and other consumer groups."
http://www.todayifoundout.com/index.php/2014/12/food-labels-peanut-butter-hearings/
Today, you can't call a product "peanut butter" unless it's made of at least 90 percent ground up peanuts. Otherwise it has to be labeled "peanut-spread."
See also: Pringles are not "chips" they are "potato-crisps" http://www.todayifoundout.com/index.php/2012/04/the-inventor-of-the-pringles-can-was-buried-in-one/
JiggaJonsonsays...@smr
Well, there was a fight over the definition of butter too, but not what you described.
I think the biggest difference is the possibility that the public could confuse one product for another.
The public uses nut milk as a substitute for animal milk, you put it on cereal, in shakes, dunk cookies in it, etc. It's a white liquid that differs in taste, but is made to be close to animal milk.
The fight over "butter" as a definition happened between butter and margerine. The butter people, at one point even lobbied for a law making it so magerine could not be sold in the color yellow. It makes sense to some degree. They are similar products. They are used in almost identical application.
It's probably the case that nothing like that happened with peanut butter because it's not close enough to regular butter to be confused as churned milk fat.
One could argue that people may put peanut butter on toast with jelly with their breakfast, possibly; but they'd know what product they are using. No one would try to put a dollop of apple or peanut butter in a pan to fry up some eggs. They are night and day different products and it's not as though one would be confused about what you were getting into with the purchase of apple butter instead of butter.
Whereas milk vs almond milk seem similar enough, and butter and margerine are similar enough and both used the same; the FDA then decided that a distinction should be made.
mxxconsays...Don't insert anything into my nut milk! It's not a joke!
*insert joke about milking my nuts here*
JiggaJonsonsays...@smr
Think about news stories of people putting their babies on vegan diets.
https://broadly.vice.com/en_us/article/wjqbem/judge-convicts-parents-after-baby-dies-from-vegan-diet
People are genuinely confused and think "nut milk = just as good as regular milk" vegan "meat" should be good enough for my baby to grow up healthy.
The mistakes like this are tragic, and simply refining the definitions so a doctor can say "Your baby needs X, not Y," is what's taking place.
It may seem trivial, but there are pleanty of examples of people who seem confused enough https://www.quora.com/Can-I-try-almond-milk-if-I-am-allergic-to-nuts
BSRsays...Dude! Watch your back. I think you know too much.
I'm willing to bet you wear a lab coat and can play the piano really well.
*wondering how much of my life I've squandered*
@smr
Well, there was a fight over the definition of butter too, but not what you described.
I think the biggest difference is the possibility that the public could confuse one product for another.
The public uses nut milk as a substitute for animal milk, you put it on cereal, in shakes, dunk cookies in it, etc. It's a white liquid that differs in taste, but is made to be close to animal milk.
The fight over "butter" as a definition happened between butter and margerine. The butter people, at one point even lobbied for a law making it so magerine could not be sold in the color yellow. It makes sense to some degree. They are similar products. They are used in almost identical application.
It's probably the case that nothing like that happened with peanut butter because it's not close enough to regular butter to be confused as churned milk fat.
One could argue that people may put peanut butter on toast with jelly with their breakfast, possibly; but they'd know what product they are using. No one would try to put a dollop of apple or peanut butter in a pan to fry up some eggs. They are night and day different products and it's not as though one would be confused about what you were getting into with the purchase of apple butter instead of butter.
Whereas milk vs almond milk seem similar enough, and butter and margerine are similar enough and both used the same; the FDA then decided that a distinction should be made.
entr0pysays...Except that we've been using the word "milk" in English to refer to the whitish watery drinkable extract of plants for centuries, with written examples dating back over 600 years. So yeah, no.
http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/118437?rskey=oiLhN2&result=1#eid
JiggaJonsonsays...Argument from tradition is a fallacy.
Except that we've been using the word "milk" in English to refer to the whitish watery drinkable extract of plants for centuries, with written examples dating back over 600 years. So yeah, no.
http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/118437?rskey=oiLhN2&result=1#eid
Sagemindsays...And American Cheese (Velveeta, Singles, Cheese whiz etc.) is not cheese, they have none of the bacterial culture that makes up cheese.
So they call it "Processed Cheese Food"
I think it's fair for the dairy industry to lobby for this. It's an argument of definition.
You make almond milk basically by taking almonds and blending them up with water then straining.
They could call it "milk-substitute" perhaps. Point being, it's not the same thing as milk from a cow.
Peanut butter went through a similar episode in history when Jif added a bunch of crap that wasn't peanuts to its mix.
"Jif, in an effort to overtake Skippy and Peter Pan, added sweeteners and reduced their actual peanut content to improve the flavor and increase the profit margin. According to a lab study (granted, by a lab run by Skippy’s parent company, Best Foods), Jif peanut butter contained 25 percent hydrogenated oil and only 75 percent actual peanuts. This greatly concerned the FDA and other consumer groups."
http://www.todayifoundout.com/index.php/2014/12/food-labels-peanut-butter-hearings/
Today, you can't call a product "peanut butter" unless it's made of at least 90 percent ground up peanuts. Otherwise it has to be labeled "peanut-spread."
See also: Pringles are not "chips" they are "potato-crisps" http://www.todayifoundout.com/index.php/2012/04/the-inventor-of-the-pringles-can-was-buried-in-one/
Sagemindsays...Dandelion Milk...
Except that we've been using the word "milk" in English to refer to the whitish watery drinkable extract of plants for centuries, with written examples dating back over 600 years. So yeah, no.
http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/118437?rskey=oiLhN2&result=1#eid
MrTeetjokingly says...This was udderly rediculous!
Discuss...
Enable JavaScript to submit a comment.