dag says...

Comment hidden because you are ignoring dag. (show it anyway)

This is really over-blown. CP - please don't put posts in channels where they don't belong. We take our classification of content fairly seriously. Come to think of it - it's a bad idea to retitle content in a way that makes the description untrue because it will throw off our search and dupe detection. So ... don't do that either. In short, don't hurt the Sift.

rickegee says...

And for future Islam invocations, gwaan's intent for the old collective was painfully clear:

"This collective is dedicated to celebrating the rich tapestry of Islamic culture - from the Moorish heritage of Andalusia to the Sufi traditions of China. It is a place for celebrating the languages, cultures, traditions, musics, and arts of all Islamic peoples. It hopes to show the other side of Islamic countries like Iran, Palestine, Syria, Pakistan, and Saudi Arabia - the side rarely shown by Western media. It also aims to dispel the oft-repeated myth of a 'clash of civilizations' and expose those in politics and media who cultivate this myth in order to achieve certain political objectives. Finally, it is a place for discussing the key theological, social, and political issues which dominate the Islamic world: Palestine, Iraq, Chechnya, Kashmir, US foreign policy, British foreign policy, imperialism, democracy, sectarianism, 'terrorism', oil, the Islamic state, Islamic law - interpretation and legal authority, women's rights, minorities' rights, Islamic identity in the West, the public image of Islam, the future of Islam.

From time to time I'll post some important news stories from/concerning the Islamic world which will appear in the comments section of the collective."


I miss gwaan. I miss me.

burdturgler says...

Read the post right above yours
"...democracy, sectarianism, 'terrorism', oil, the Islamic state..."
That would be terrorism in relation to Islam, not domestic terrorism like Timothy McVeigh, etc.
And it needs to be part of the content of the video.

CaptainPlanet420 says...

>> ^burdturgler:
Read the post right above yours
"...democracy, sectarianism, 'terrorism', oil, the Islamic state..."
That would be terrorism in relation to Islam, not domestic terrorism like Timothy McVeigh, etc.
And it needs to be part of the content of the video.


Oops sry, didn't read the paragraph closely enough.

my15minutes says...

>> ^MINK:
> Videosift's McCarthy Era continues.


that's so weak, mink. this is about his behavior, not politics.

i agree cp's a childish, manipulative prick, and the only person i have on ignore, but wouldn't call a siftquisition. just leave lucky or dag a page comment and let them decide.

CaptWillard says...

Jesus, I left this place when CaptainAsswipe420 was a bronze star and was hating on gays.

I remember it well. And by the way BillO, nice necro-quality you gave CP420 for that fucking farce of an apology he offered. I used to occasionally find you amusing. Now you are just another worthless troll. Please downvote this comment. It's what you are best at.

Unfortunately enough of you guys gave CP420 enough votes to get him a gold star. I am sure you voted for his videos in good faith, putting aside the fact that he is a dickhead. Now look where we are at with him. I am not blaming you because I probably would have voted for some of his videos too, including the one in question. I have been lurking here the past couple of days just trying to make heads or tails of this shit and I still do not get it. I guess I will start by saying this:

1. Screw you MINK. You're calling this McCarthyism? What a hypocrite. I remember when you chastised us for wallowing in free speech and egalitarianism because poor little gluonium stormed off. Now you want to spook us with the specter of McCarthyism - the supression of free speech and thought, which doesn't at all apply here - even though you wanted to muzzle us back then for no better reason than you liking little glu-glu.

Is that too ad hominem for you, MINK? I also remember when you took us to task for ad homs, even though you have used the word "retarded" to describe people and points of view you don't like more than anyone I've ever met. Just look here people, and tell I'm wrong about that. For a condescending elitist your vocabulary isn't worth a shit, minky.

This is not about McCarthyism. It is about nothing more than dealing with a fucking troll because he is doing typical trollish shit. He is not making any thoughtful or valid arguments, and his negative contributions to this place far exceed anything positive he has brought. He is just creating a shitstorm of controversy. That is all he wants, and that is all he has ever wanted here. In other words he is just a fucking troll.

2. Screw you choggie. I used to like you at one time. Now you are just a spiteful and petty troll with sock puppets who like to use taboo words like nigger and camel jockey. Dag had to redact that second comment for many reasons. I am sure the use of "camel jockey" was one of the them. Now I know why CP420 likes you so well. Birds of a feather flock together.

3. Dag and lucky: Why wasn't CP420 banned after this comment? Seriously. According to former admin James Roe you haved purged users for racism. How is this different? I am a heterosexual male with a black father and a white mother, but I would have been offended no worse if CP420 had described black people as "losers" instead of gays. Both insults are just as bad. If you think I am wrong then tell me how.

You have banned members for troop bashing:

http://www.videosift.com/talk/Can-I-get-a-ban-admins-Please

And for general douchebaggery:

http://www.videosift.com/member/iloseatlife

So what makes CP420 so special? The gold star next to his name? I think you owe the members of this community - the community you founded - an explanation that involves more than "tolerance." Tolerance is great. That doesn't mean we have to allow Fred Phelps to start posting comments, does it? As far as this particular case goes, are you going to allow CP420 to smear Muslims by portraying them as scheming cabalists who are trying to destroy a neo-con hero? For the sake of argument, let's say there was a "Judaism" channel. What if every time someone posted a video about the banking industry - and there are lot of those lately - someone used the Judaism tag? Would that not be offensive to Jews? The great Zionist conpiracy LIE of the past has been transformed into the great Muslim conspiracy LIE of the present. Please explain if you disagree.

This is just a web site with a relatively small number of members who want a respectful community. If I remember you didn't want this place to become like YouTube. Yet here we are.

If my questions sound too demanding I really do not care. I have not been here for a long time anyway so you can ban me for all I care. The only reason I am here now is because I am currently staying with a friend right now who is still a member, and curiosity got the best of me so I logged in. I almost wish I hadn't now. Maybe you are wishing the same thing too.

4. To everyone else: If dag and lucky don't get rid of CP420 all I can suggest is to never vote for his videos again EVER, and any time he ever writes something even remotely stupid - all the time - downvote it. He does it all the time to you. Return the favor. He seems to delight in his role as a troll, so treat him as such. He deserves no better.

5. To CaptainPlanet420: Fuck you youngling. You are a fucking coward who feels tough by taking on an entire VIRTUAL community. Would you talk the same shit to REAL people at a gay pride parade, or at a gathering of Muslims? Don't answer that, youngling. You will only embarrass yourself. It is what you do best.

*promote for further discussion

dystopianfuturetoday says...

Choggie, rather than just coming back with new screen names, saying the stuff you always say, why not sneak back into the site with a false identity.

You could pretend to be a kind, rational, funny, good-natured guy, with excellent grammar and spelling. Keep this up for a year or so until you get all of your sift powers back, and then you can bust out a sift talk: "Hey evarbuddy, imma Choggie inna sift, you asshole-bastards. 911 was an inside job. (or whatever you want to say)".....

.....or even better, don't ever reveal your true identity. After all, he who laughs last, laughs longest.

Krupo says...

>> ^blankfist:
I hear if you discard all of someone's videos, they lose their star status and you can then instaban them. I'm just saying.


Unless they have enough "old school" star points from the pre-Sift3.3 era for dead fixes and comment applause.

Just sayin'.


>> ^my15minutes:
>> ^MINK:
> Videosift's McCarthy Era continues.

that's so weak, mink. this is about his behavior, not politics.
i agree cp's a childish, manipulative prick, and the only person i have on ignore, but wouldn't call a siftquisition. just leave lucky or dag a page comment and let them decide.


MINK is being a "real" troll, in the positive sense. The gadfly sense.

In the OMGWTFBBQ not another siftquisition sense.

legacy0100 says...

well can't we make it so that original sifter cannot change his/her own contents after it's been sifted?

It's worhty enough to get 10 votes and go upto the front page, so it freezes the way it is. And edits can only be made by other sifters? (same thing with upvoted comments right now. You get an award for one of yoru comments, but you can still edit it. So you can make it seem like people voted for a comment like 'I like to kill babies' or something.)

There will always be people who will try to abuse the system. When that happens, all you gotta do is mend the cracks and seal the gaps. After they've got nothing to do, they'll just go somewhere else to look for trouble or try to find different ways to abuse the system again.

Bottom line is that there always will be people like these, and they have some use in the community. They vigilantly find faults in our system so that we can keep on modifying it and to make it better.

So far I have not seen much progress done to PREVENT such things from happening, other than just banning the guy.

Sure he's an ass, but that does not excuse our lack of vigil to fix the fault in our system

Of course, that's kinda harsh since there only 1 coder, lucky, doing all the work, and it's a massive amount of work for just 1 person, which is another problem.

So problems we face right now is:

1. How are we going to prevent people from changing their submission content once it's been sifted?

2. How can we help videosift's maintenance problem? Which is that Lucky is the only person fixing things right now?


In conclusion, the way I see it, it's not captainplanet420's douchebaggery that's the issue. It's Videosift's vulnerability.



^Issy

Teh Interwarbs is corrupting you!! Nooo poor sweet housepet Issy is turning into a streetcat

burdturgler says...

There will always be ways to screw with the site, no matter how much work you put into securing vulnerabilities. It's douchebags who intentionally go out of their way to take advantage of it and abuse the site that are the problem. When the admin of the site tells you to not do it, and you do it anyway, that deserves a ban.

MINK says...

dude, willard, the detail and effort you put into that is astonishing. and by "aston" i mean "call a doctor" and by "ishing" i mean "smoke some of this".

the testimony and evidence you submitted here, your tone of voice, your ripping 2 of my thousands of sentence out of context and pointing a big finger at me, well that's er.... hypocritical and... mccarthyite? mcarthartic? mccarthesque?

your assumption that i take my words here as seriously as you do is amusing.
*inhale

MINK says...

by the way that "incriminating" link to the history of my usage of the word "retard" contained some of my best work. But you are maybe so retarded you didn't read this paragraph:

" Try to understand, this is not the real me on screen, it's MINK. I don't actually care if you like it or not. Does that insult you? I share some beliefs with MINK, but i would NEVER be as much of an asshole as MINK in real life. Try to wrap your head around this. It's theatre. (gay). I am on the internet, not under oath in court. I know only about 4% of the SIft actually think this way. But it's true, some people have an imagination and they use it."

CaptWillard says...

^So what are you saying MINK? You have multiple personalities? Can I call you multiple-MINK?

What you write is all part of big, beautiful you. What I wrote is all part of big, beautiful me. I have flaws. My comments reveal some of them. What flaws of yours are being revealed in your comments? Or are you perfect?

Don't try to bullshit me with this complex, multidimensional MINK act. I don't buy it. Guess what? No one else is buying it either. Look at your words and then look in the mirror: The same person. I think I got that from a fortune cookie. Pretty cool, huh?

Like I said earlier, self-banishment is only one click away. Just hit that "log out" button and you won't have to suffer us retards anymore. Sorry, you will still have to suffer the retards in Lithuania. And they you.

volumptuous says...

>> ^CaptWillard:
3. Dag and lucky: Why wasn't CP420 banned after this comment? Seriously.



You're serious about that one?

So let me get this straight, obviously super sarcastic humor is now considered "hate speech"?

ps: You just personally attacked several sifters in this one post, so shouldn't you be banned now?


BAN THE SIFTQUISITIONS!!!!

imstellar28 says...

^seriously, ban siftquisitions. the system of "law" here is rooted in the word "inquisition" for god sakes. you are the same type of people who have been burning people at the stake for the last 10,000 years--only difference is now you do it on internet web forums.

you are still the same, terrible, people.

Send this Article to a Friend



Separate multiple emails with a comma (,); limit 5 recipients






Your email has been sent successfully!

Manage this Video in Your Playlists

New Blog Posts from All Members