He flinched;) But only once. Awesome.

Great if you come into contact with somebody low on bullets or easily persuaded to give up...

>> ^rottenseed:

Great if you come into contact with somebody low on bullets or easily persuaded to give up...


ok, keep your stupid non bullet proof glass then, negative nancy

Like a boss!

Oh, I get it. We sell guns to Mexico and then we sell them bullet-resistant glass! *money *commercial

Adding video to channels (Commercial, Money) - requested by MrFisk.

What do you want to bet they used lead rounds instead of mil surp FMJ?

Firing a rifle at a flat(ish) target at close range in a small concrete room seems dangerous enough.

edit: Er... also noticed the safety glasses on his head.

But I thought this was self-evidently fake?

I'm sure he still had to change his pants
>> ^possom:

He flinched;) But only once. Awesome.

Man that is one sneaky anti-abortion propaganda.

I'd shoot him for wearing those flipflops.
I'd also shoot the cameraman for aiming it so low that everybody have to bend down to be in the frame.

So if CEO stands behind his products, does that mean Larry Flint have to star in his company's films?

FAKE! J/K!

>> ^ant:

FAKE! J/K!


Without the urban dictionary, I would consider ant a troll
Also: Who still uses bullets? How about tank-resistant glas?

Yes, people prolly asked about real bullet protection. So try that again with .50 caliber.

Real and been used for a long time to protect the president. http://youtu.be/YeSPlCRcpds?t=49s

AK 47 is a relatively weak rifle to test it with. Compared to a 7.62 NATO which is far more common in the United States it has a maximum 1260 ft-lbf of energy at the muzzle to the NATO 7.62's 2500-3000. And 7.62 NATO is not a heavy load either. A .50 cal BMG (as someone suggested) has 11,000 - 13,000, ten times the 7.62 Russian's energy.

>> ^Drachen_Jager:

AK 47 is a relatively weak rifle to test it with. Compared to a 7.62 NATO which is far more common in the United States it has a maximum 1260 ft-lbf of energy at the muzzle to the NATO 7.62's 2500-3000. And 7.62 NATO is not a heavy load either. A .50 cal BMG (as someone suggested) has 11,000 - 13,000, ten times the 7.62 Russian's energy.


what? i have no idea where you would be using this glass, but i can guarantee you that an AK47 is likely the most powerful HANDHELD firearm you're going to be facing next to an RPG launcher or something. everyone from detroit gangbangers to iraqi insurgents to rebels in the congo have AK47s. the next step up for most of those guys is likely a .50 cal mounted machine gun, and at that point you're boned regardless of your GLASS, because that shit can go through relatively thick STEEL.

They say don't try this at home, but nothing about trying it at work like they're doing.

This boss is lucky his employee didn't stand behind the product as well; otherwise, it would have been a bloodbath.

i may be going out on a limb here but I'm fairly certain their primary consumer base are contractors overseas, in which case, an ak 47 you'll see 9 times out of 10. Technically you're right about the difference in muzzle velocity but it doesn't really matter when you're marketing your product to people who are being shot at by ak's 99% of the time. and from my experience with "bulletproof" materials, if it can stop an ak, it will still be effective against any other 7.62 weapon system

i would like to see how it holds up against a dshk tho. those are common enough .50 cal weapons particularly in afghanistan and parts of africa and they're scary as hell

>> ^Drachen_Jager:

AK 47 is a relatively weak rifle to test it with. Compared to a 7.62 NATO which is far more common in the United States it has a maximum 1260 ft-lbf of energy at the muzzle to the NATO 7.62's 2500-3000. And 7.62 NATO is not a heavy load either. A .50 cal BMG (as someone suggested) has 11,000 - 13,000, ten times the 7.62 Russian's energy.

I loved how he was wearing flip flops!>> ^mxxcon:

I'd shoot him for wearing those flipflops.
I'd also shoot the cameraman for aiming it so low that everybody have to bend down to be in the frame.
So if CEO stands behind his products, does that mean Larry Flint have to star in his company's films?



Good luck finding half-jacketed 7.62 x39 rounds.
>> ^dgandhi:

What do you want to bet they used lead rounds instead of mil surp FMJ?

>> ^smooman:

i may be going out on a limb here but I'm fairly certain their primary consumer base are contractors overseas, in which case, an ak 47 you'll see 9 times out of 10. Technically you're right about the difference in muzzle velocity but it doesn't really matter when you're marketing your product to people who are being shot at by ak's 99% of the time. and from my experience with "bulletproof" materials, if it can stop an ak, it will still be effective against any other 7.62 weapon system
i would like to see how it holds up against a dshk tho. those are common enough .50 cal weapons particularly in afghanistan and parts of africa and they're scary as hell
>> ^Drachen_Jager:
AK 47 is a relatively weak rifle to test it with. Compared to a 7.62 NATO which is far more common in the United States it has a maximum 1260 ft-lbf of energy at the muzzle to the NATO 7.62's 2500-3000. And 7.62 NATO is not a heavy load either. A .50 cal BMG (as someone suggested) has 11,000 - 13,000, ten times the 7.62 Russian's energy.



Yep, there's something to be said for probability.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zM7HDRhViHQ

>> ^MarineGunrock:

Good luck finding half-jacketed 7.62 x39 rounds.


http://www.sportsmansguide.com/net/cb/golden-bear-762x39-125-grain-sp-ammo-20-rds.aspx?a=472398

They are required for legal hunting in many states, but nobody attacking an armored car is going to go out of their way to find less effective ammo. The fact that they don't actually say what they are firing, makes me suspicious.

I don't know why anyone would want to hunt with that round, but still, I seriously doubt they used half jackets. It's not like bulletproof glass is something that only exists in the movies.

Look how the first shot shatters the bottom edge of the window, or its holder, and seemingly opens a hole through which the boss could be shot.

>> ^rottenseed:

Great if you come into contact with somebody low on bullets or easily persuaded to give up...


Three shots is probably how many would actually hit if someone unloaded a full magazine into the car.

No, behind the camera would suffice. Yep, he was there. >> ^mxxcon:

So if CEO stands behind his products, does that mean Larry Flint have to star in his company's films?

Tags for this video have been changed from 'AK47, guns, bullet resistant' to 'AK47, guns, bullet resistant, glass' - edited by calvados

*dead

This video has been declared non-functional; embed code must be fixed within 2 days or it will be sent to the dead pool - declared dead by Lilithia.