Beau makes a damned good case as to how Judge Amy Coney Barrett effectively proved today that she's disqualified. If you happen to support her nomination, I'd love to hear your justification on the point he makes.
newtboysays...

100% correct, sir. That was a total softball question she got wrong in a few ways, a question that goes to the heart of the job and any nominee should be able to answer in their sleep.
Unfit for nomination, much less confirmation.
Any vote to confirm is a vote AGAINST the constitution.
*doublepromote *quality

siftbotsays...

Double-Promoting this video and sending it back into the queue for one more try; last queued Wednesday, October 14th, 2020 9:09pm PDT - doublepromote requested by newtboy.

Boosting this quality contribution up in the Hot Listing - declared quality by newtboy.

vilsays...

The justification is simple, really. It does not matter.

I have been noticing this brashness in political appointments of officials on all levels not just in the US and I believe it stems from the advances in marketing in recent decades.

There is an obvious sub-set of obscure qualifications that are now necessary to hold office:

- do you cater to the ruling mob?
- do you have a cult following?
- do you look good on camera?
- are you willing to say anything?
- are you loyal to the grave?

So id say its a pass. An easy pass.

Everything else can be glossed over by manipulation and careful editing. And good make-up artists.

newtboysays...

The Russians won't spring for a professional translation program. It's impossible to believe someone so anti American is American. Bob is obviously a Russian troll with no brain and little American history.

But what does it matter, someone trained to think like a first grader should really spell like one too.

moonsammysaid:

Jesus fuck bob, at least spell your insults correctly! It's "doofus" and "lose" you fucking knob.

bobknight33says...

Sorry that you get your news from the VIEW.

I listen to the hearing.

On and off for about 4 hours last 2 days

newtboysaid:

While I totally agree, YOU really shouldn't talk shit about Dumb Donald, you're going to end up in a gulag.

drradonsays...

Mr. Janice Joplin T-shirt clerked with exactly who on the Supreme Court? With a law degree from where??? And that qualifies him to comment on the competence of Ms. Barrett? Not quite as funny as our current crop of comedians who think they're qualified to comment on national policy...

newtboysays...

Lol. Right. More projection. Sorry sunshine, I'm pretty certain I've established a reputation for multiple legitimate sources and verifying my claims in stark contrast to you who only sites illegitimate and unverified far right Russian based internet media.

I seriously doubt that you listened or watched, and I know if you did you didn't understand 4/5 of it. I guess you were totally full of shit saying you're employed and going in to work then.

So, a nominee who can't answer the most basic questions about the constitution should be confirmed as one of 9 people who interpret it? Knowing it forwards and backwards would seem a bare minimum requirement...but not for you or trump, you need a justice who's ignorant of the constitution to get her to ignore and violate it for you. Enjoy the new 19 justice court with 10 new seats filled by Biden and an amendment making adding more unconstitutional. Because we can is now the standard set by Republicans, they have zero legitimacy complaining, and will have zero power to stop it.

So cute, sweety. Pretending to be informed. That's just precious, doll.

bobknight33said:

Sorry that you get your news from the VIEW.

I listen to the hearing.

On and off for about 4 hours last 2 days

newtboysays...

Lol.
I love it, Bobski, because I understand it's a well known tool of internet fraudsters who intentionally use kindergarten level spelling and grammar to identify the gullible idiots who will ignore that and continue to listen to the scam, often idiots so stupid they end up buying into it.
Funny you don't find any takers here, ain't it?

Thanks for constantly identifying yourself as a scammer, I say.

It made figuring out you are just a trolling scammer years ago much easier, and gives others that same evidence constantly....that and the Giuliani level insanity and break from reality.

Derp.

bobknight33said:

That pissis you off?

Too o faking badd.

bobknight33says...

Trollboy She is qualified and worthy of the position.

She missed 1 basic question in 15 hours+ of hearings with out notes.



Who among us can do that? Who has done that?

I realize you don't understand this stuff because all you see is orange man bad. Blind rage has indeed blinded you. OR maybe you just prefer the party of debauchery, keeping black people poor ,uneducated in crime/rat infected Democrat cities.


MEGA landslide 2020

newtboysaid:

Lol. Right. More projection. Sorry sunshine, I'm pretty certain I've established a reputation for multiple legitimate sources and verifying my claims in stark contrast to you who only sites illegitimate and unverified far right Russian based internet media.

I seriously doubt that you listened or watched, and I know if you did you didn't understand 4/5 of it. I guess you were totally full of shit saying you're employed and going in to work then.

So, a nominee who can't answer the most basic questions about the constitution should be confirmed as one of 9 people who interpret it? Knowing it forwards and backwards would seem a bare minimum requirement...but not for you or trump, you need a justice who's ignorant of the constitution to get her to ignore and violate it for you. Enjoy the new 19 justice court with 10 new seats filled by Biden and an amendment making adding more unconstitutional. Because we can is now the standard set by Republicans, they have zero legitimacy complaining, and will have zero power to stop it.

So cute, sweety. Pretending to be informed. That's just precious, doll.

luxintenebrissays...

all of us are qualified.

literally.

since anyone can serve on the SCOTUS then all are qualified to question her competence.

anyone can comment on national policy. are you familiar with the internet?

JANIS Joplin is a plus. at least he knows quality music. (deride him and misspell the name that's right in front of you?)

drradonsaid:

Mr. Janice Joplin T-shirt clerked with exactly who on the Supreme Court? With a law degree from where??? And that qualifies him to comment on the competence of Ms. Barrett? Not quite as funny as our current crop of comedians who think they're qualified to comment on national policy...

newtboysays...

She refused to answer most questions relative to the job...and was dumbfounded by the most basic, simple question. If he hadn't told her there are five rights she would have answered "freedom of speech" and thought she answered well. She only answered softball questions and pats on the back before this. I can do that all day long.

Oh Bobby. Did bad man make Bobby cwy huwt? Yes, orangutan's bad, but he's not alone. I obviously see far more than just rage, but it is enraging for patriots to see a convicted con man and thief in the Whitehouse costing us trillions and hundreds of thousands of deaths being propped up by our enemies.

No Bob, I clearly don't prefer republicans who fit the definition you came up with...uneducated in crime, that doesn't fit the criminal republicans unless you mean uneducated in fighting crime, then check, rat infected Republican cities (big towns, but we'll humor you) that fits, debauchery (congratulations on looking up the spelling) holy shit does that describe Republicans more than democrats, keeping poor people poor, check republicans, doubly so if you make that poor black people.

Sorry sweetheart. Red Tsunami 2018 + 2020

2020- thanks trump.

bobknight33said:

Trollboy She is qualified and worthy of the position.

She missed 1 basic question in 15 hours+ of hearings with out notes.



Who among us can do that? Who has done that?

I realize you don't understand this stuff because all you see is orange man bad. Blind rage has indeed blinded you. OR maybe you just prefer the party of debauchery, keeping black people poor ,uneducated in crime/rat infected Democrat cities.


MEGA landslide 2020

newtboysays...

Sorry Hon.
It's no surprise you're too dumb to remember what I've told you a dozen times before yesterday when I told you again, I don't watch your insane propaganda links, nothing to see there but misrepresentation and blatant lies. Keep them.
I'm sure you'll forget that at your shift change when the next Bob takes over.

bobknight33said:

@newtboy


Black Lives Don't Matter To Democrats

luxintenebrisjokingly says...

trollboy? that's rich. (bezos rich)

that 1 basic question is on every american naturalization test. so it's a big miss. could rattle off that answer now and since jr. h.s.

with notes? most questions were dodged. same formula, same answer. so that's debatable.

"Who among us can do that? Who has done that?" they dropped the charges if that's what your asking!

lambast newt for orange rage then 🦜 mousse-lini's venom?

you're too funny to be funny.

...though i do admit i have been to a debauchery party...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D2q5zfKjkaY

bobknight33said:

Trollboy She is qualified and worthy of the position.

She missed 1 basic question in 15 hours+ of hearings with out notes.



Who among us can do that? Who has done that?

I realize you don't understand this stuff because all you see is orange man bad. Blind rage has indeed blinded you. OR maybe you just prefer the party of debauchery, keeping black people poor ,uneducated in crime/rat infected Democrat cities.


MEGA landslide 2020

newtboysays...

Fuck yeah...oiling up my saw right now!

luxintenebrissaid:

trollboy? that's rich. (bezos rich)

that 1 basic question is on every american naturalization test. so it's a big miss. could rattle off that answer now and since jr. h.s.

with notes? most questions were dodged. same formula, same answer. so that's debatable.

"Who among us can do that? Who has done that?" they dropped the charges if that's what your asking!

lambast newt for orange rage then 🦜 mousse-lini's venom?

you're too funny to be funny.

...though i do admit i have been to a debauchery party...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D2q5zfKjkaY

Mordhaussays...

This has nothing to do with her capability. It never has been. It has to do with people pissed because there is a nominee during this time.

News flash, it doesn't matter if Trump wins or loses. He can nominate someone even after he loses. Until he is replaced, he is THE President of the United States.

No judge is required to have a photographic memory of the Constitution. I bet you could ask SITTING judges on the Supreme Court and have them miss a question. That is what clerks and research people are for.

What this comes down to is two basic things.

1. Merrick Garland never made it onto the court. People are still bitterly pissed off that he didn't. But what they forget is that he WAS nominated and did not get through the process due to a Republican majority. It was perfectly legal and was allowed. It sucks if you wanted him, but that is the way the game works.

2. People are STILL scared that Roe v Wade is going to go bye bye or the ACA is going to get kneecapped. News flash, SCOTUS has been majority Conservative leaning judges for YEARS. When Gorsuch was picked, all I recall hearing was OMG OMG, THE SKY IS FALLING, ROE V WADE IS DEAD! Same thing as when Kavanaugh was picked; although they were pissed about his supposed rape as well, every news site was repeating the mantra about Roe V Wade now dead.

It isn't going to happen. Not at a Federal level. It would be suicide for years. Conservatives, by and large, do not give a fuck about abortion. It's only the squirrelly ultra right wing pricks that care and Republicans sadly have to cater to them verbally to keep their votes. States, yeah, some will pass laws and then those will get turned away from SCOTUS like they have been for a while. The appellate courts will set the precedent on those rulings and they solidly rule for Roe v Wade.

Same thing for the ACA, although personally I wish that would die a fucking quick death. As I've said before many times, that little gem has fucked the value of my family insurance from work into the ground. I didn't get to keep my doctor unless I wanted to pay 2k+ per person per year, because he and a shit ton of other doctors went to Concierge fees to cover the money they were losing under the ACA. Now I have to go to either:

A. Doctor's who have horrible ratings for their practice, ie ones that suck or just don't care.

B. A clinic setup where I 'technically' have a 'family doctor' but in reality I can be bumped to others on staff or, most likely, a PA. There is no feeling that I know my doctor because, even if I do get to see him, they just run me through as fast as possible so they can get another patient in.

I have pre-existing conditions, so I empathize with those who are on the ACA. But the act itself is fucked up beyond repair. It needs to die and get replaced with a true national insurance. If not that, something that lets me go back to feeling like I have a real doctor and not just whoever is johnny on the spot at that moment.

It isn't going to be killed at SCOTUS though, they don't want to legislate. They will let it survive and if you think otherwise you are drinking the liberal koolaid that they are serving to round up voters.

I like the Youtuber and do agree with his other videos. I do not agree with this. I can diagnose a Macbook Pro right now if I had to, even after being away from Apple for around 8 years. But I might need to pull up a damn schematic or reference manual to know how much resistance I should be looking for on the PPbus if it isn't present when trying to power the thing on. If I and everyone else had photographic memories, we wouldn't have reference material. Wikipedia wouldn't exist. This is simply a nitpick because people are worried and still pissed.

Zaibachsays...

Bob, of all those years I've been a member here, I've never seen anything you wrote that is worth reading.

newtboysays...

Zaibach has been here longer than you, Bob. Edit: He quoted you 4 months ago, so yes you have heard not just of, but directly from him.

🤦‍♂️

Jesus, you can't research anything, that's why you believe OAN and trump, you know nothing, so you are free to believe them without any knowledge that would expose them as consummate liars.

You must be so scared, with everything you know being proven wrong constantly. The world without trump, without your fake news fed to you direct from Russia, with right wing terrorist organizations being rounded up and blocked from social media, you'll soon be alone in your cave of ignorance.

bobknight33said:

Who are you? Are you new here? Never heard of you.

Send this Article to a Friend



Separate multiple emails with a comma (,); limit 5 recipients






Your email has been sent successfully!

Manage this Video in Your Playlists




notify when someone comments
X

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
  
Learn More