College Girl's 'Fuck List'

TYT explore a college girl who rates the whole duke lacross team in bed. October 5, 2010
GenjiKilpatricksays...

@sirex
Points to consider:

Accepting money in exchange for sexual favors. That makes you a whore.

Who the hell randomly chooses their sexual partners? Enjoy STDs much?

If anything, it makes sense that she'd make her selections from the same circle of candidates, for multiple reasons:

She obviously like athletic guys. It's much easier to obtain vital information. She'd have plenty of opportunities to court the ones she liked.

You're just calling her a whore cause our culture allows for it.

Yogisays...

>> ^GenjiKilpatrick:

@<a rel="nofollow" href="http://videosift.com/member/sirex" title="member since February 23rd, 2007" class="profilelink">sirex
Points to consider:
Accepting money in exchange for sexual favors. That makes you a whore.
Who the hell randomly chooses their sexual partners? Enjoy STDs much?
If anything, it makes sense that she'd make her selections from the same circle of candidates, for multiple reasons:
She obviously like athletic guys. It's much easier to obtain vital information. She'd have plenty of opportunities to court the ones she liked.
You're just calling her a whore cause our culture allows for it.


I think there's a difference between liking athletic guys liking sex and pursuing relationships...and fucking the entire Lacross team. This was a goal that she set for herself...to fuck all these guys. She succeeded grats to her, however yes she is a Whore. Sorry to cite this buttttt. http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/whore?show=0&t=1286402001

Under the 3rd definition "venal or unscrupulous person". She's certainly unscrupulous/

LarsaruSsays...

I am baffled by some of these comments. If it had been a male who had slept with the entire cheerleader team I think a lot of these comments would have been about "High-fives" and "Cheers" or some such not about whores/sluts and their definitions. Welcome to the year 2010 and gender *equality... Females are just as allowed to screw around as males. Get over it.

Shepppardsays...

@LarsaruS

Equality Channel Description:
"A channel for videos relating to racism, bigotry, discrimination, segregation / integration, sexism, tyranny, civil rights and all struggles for equality.
Political and economic oppression videos also have a home here."

This video is not about any of those things, and you can't flag it as such because of the comments.

*Nochannel *Sexuality *Politics *News *Viral *Talks *Controversy

GenjiKilpatricksays...

@Yogi

She didn't fuck the entire lacrosse team. There are 42 members on the roster. She slept with 13.

You have no idea what her goals were or even over what period of time she slept with those boys.
[Since when does engaging in sex twice a month with two different partners make you a slut.]

The 3rd definition "venal or unscrupulous person" still implies someone who is willing to be immoral for the proper compensation. i.e.

"Yogi's a comment whore. He'll post any type of comment you want for five bucks and a sandwich."

Again, you're only calling her a whore because it's socially acceptable.
Which is prejudice and shitty of you.

chilaxesays...

This just in: the entire lacross team has discovered they've been gifted with genital herpes and multiple strains of HPV, including genital warts and a greater risk of penile and head & neck cancer.

It was worth it, though!

Yogisays...

>> ^GenjiKilpatrick:

@<a rel="nofollow" href="http://videosift.com/member/Yogi" title="member since May 15th, 2009" class="profilelink">Yogi
She didn't fuck the entire lacrosse team. There are 42 members on the roster. She slept with 13.
You have no idea what her goals were or even over what period of time she slept with those boys.
[Since when does engaging in sex twice a month with two different partners make you a slut.]
The 3rd definition "venal or unscrupulous person" still implies someone who is willing to be immoral for the proper compensation. i.e.
"Yogi's a comment whore. He'll post any type of comment you want for five bucks and a sandwich."
Again, you're only calling her a whore because it's socially acceptable.
Which is prejudice and shitty of you.


It pleases me that I bother you this much. Also no I'm not. You don't know me I look down on men who do the exact some bullshit...I'm an equal opportunity hater....or I'll hate for a sammich

Ryjkyjsays...

"Lacrosse isn't a sport. It's a faggy college activity. Any time your running around a field with a stick with a little net on the end of it, you're engaging in a faggoty college activity. Period."

-George Carlin

pmkierstsays...

I hereby move that TYT be banned from the sift.

If that is not possible, how about a twit filter for it.

If that is not possible, how about super clearly marked.

Good god these people bug me, and I am normally super relaxed.

bareboards2says...

I went to the source and read several pages of the actual thesis.

It wasn't the Lacrosse team, it was athletes at Duke. A couple were baseball players. And her first "subject" was encountered in Sept 2008. I don't know when the last one was. Presumably 2010 sometime.

I stopped reading about halfway through. Parts of it, I was thinking "you go, girl", parts of it I was wincing. I had to stop when the wincing predominated.

It's pretty funny, though, in general. Except when the wincing got to me.

Lawdeedawsays...

>> ^GenjiKilpatrick:
@<A rel="nofollow" class=profilelink title="member since February 23rd, 2007" href="http://videosift.com/member/sirex">sirex
Points to consider:
Accepting money in exchange for sexual favors. That makes you a whore.
Who the hell randomly chooses their sexual partners? Enjoy STDs much?
If anything, it makes sense that she'd make her selections from the same circle of candidates, for multiple reasons:
She obviously like athletic guys. It's much easier to obtain vital information. She'd have plenty of opportunities to court the ones she liked.
You're just calling her a whore cause our culture allows for it.


Whore is a bit slangish for this, however, I will agree with you that it is inappropriate as long as you never have exchanged a word to slightly mean something it does not really mean. For example, LawDee is a dick. While I do in fact have a penis, I am not fully a dick, and therefore you cannot call my whole person a dick. That goes for ass-holey, dumbass, gaytard, loser (What did I lose? And where did I put it?)

This rule must also apply to words that have a dual meaning---unless you correctly note what intended meaning you implied. "The bear was in the buff." Wait, did you mean "the naked was in the muscled." Or, "The animal was naked."


Of course I am being facious. But you must remember, you are your own culture. Sure, you can try to change it, but slangism is what we do. And sports teams is what she does.

The only thing I do not like---the double standard. If men are "whores" then call them that. I do.

GenjiKilpatricksays...

@Lawdeedaw

She slept with 13 different people over the course of 2 years.

Therefore she's not a slut whore harlot or any other slang term to suggest she's a sexual deviant.

My disagreement is less semantical and more that..

it's straight up wrong to label a complete stranger a pejorative term when you don't know fuck all about them or their situation.

Like i told yogi, it's a prejudice and shitty mindset to take.

jwraysays...

There's definitely something morally objectionable about having sex with three different guys in the same day without disclosing that to any of them. There's a rebuttable presumption of monogamy unless otherwise agreed upon.

chilaxesays...

@GenjiKilpatrick

I think it's good to be reflective about our attitudes about sex and gender, and to keep in mind that people are all different when it comes to sex and that's fine, but I think that's not the whole picture.

We call WoW obsessives nerds or dorks, we call frat guys bros or douchebags, we call Scientologists cultists, and we call Wall St. guys greedy. Her activity of choice is sex with anybody who's there... her activity is of no benefit to herself or anyone else (the odds seem good that she's spreading permanent STDs), and in her document she seems to exhibit a pattern of carelessness and insensitivity toward self-discipline and ethics... there doesn't seem any reason to make her exempt from normal social criticism.

Lawdeedawsays...

>> ^GenjiKilpatrick:
@<A rel="nofollow" class=profilelink title="member since May 3rd, 2010" href="http://videosift.com/member/Lawdeedaw">Lawdeedaw
She slept with 13 different people over the course of 2 years.
Therefore she's not a slut whore harlot or any other slang term to suggest she's a sexual deviant.
My disagreement is less semantical and more that..
it's straight up wrong to label a complete stranger a pejorative term when you don't know fuck all about them or their situation.
Like i told yogi, it's a prejudice and shitty mindset to take.


My point is that one, two, ten, five, there is no line except the line society draws. And it has been drawn here. I could care less, so long as we apply things fairly, and I think Chilaxe has a great point---which, in a way, was close to mine.

We could, also, say that she had sex to broadcast her exploits into fame. So she is a literal fame-whore. She gained something from the sex that is tangible...and...

I mean , if someone offers 100K, and you take it, you are a whore. If someone offers a job for a "job", you are a whore, if someone offers to make you famous, or you have sex with them to make yourself famous, you are a whore.

Either way, she loses

Send this Article to a Friend



Separate multiple emails with a comma (,); limit 5 recipients






Your email has been sent successfully!

Manage this Video in Your Playlists




notify when someone comments
X

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
  
Learn More