Tazed, but no fucks were given.

"I'll get you bitch!" has been crackin me up for a solid 5 minutes :-D
Shepppardsays...

I only see one prong of the tazer in him, Meaning, that the circuit can't complete and he's not getting any shock whatsoever (obviously).

Could be wrong though, if someone manages to see the second one.

ctrlaltbleachsays...

My thoughts exactly.
>> ^Shepppard:

I only see one prong of the tazer in him, Meaning, that the circuit can't complete and he's not getting any shock whatsoever (obviously).
Could be wrong though, if someone manages to see the second one.

siftbotsays...

Self promoting this video back to the front page; last published Wednesday, April 4th, 2012 8:55am PDT - promote requested by original submitter JiggaJonson.

Draxsays...

If at 0:05 his cigarette suddenly lit and he took a calm smoke from it before proceeding with his rhetoric, this would be the greatest video of all time.

spoco2says...

Again, this is some tiny portion of a longer encounter, but it looks like there's no reason at all to be using the tazer.

Man they are just being used way too often these days.

CheshireSmilejokingly says...

>> ^spoco2:

Again, this is some tiny portion of a longer encounter, but it looks like there's no reason at all to be using the tazer.
Man they are just being used way too often these days.


they're totally non-lethal! so that means they get free reign with them. right?

JiggaJonsonsays...

>> ^Hmmm:

They are tazing him...why exactly? Possession of a weapon (cigarette)?


Because they fucking feel like it! YougotaproblemBITCH?!?!? ZZZZZZZZZZZZAAAAAAAAAAP!

No, seriously though, this is horrible. Tasing someone should be a second to last resort (guns being last), NOT a first resort.

You can clearly see how easy it was for them to take this guy down even though the taser had no effect. That's exactly why it didn't need to be used.

messengersays...

Oh please. I'm among the first to rail against asshole cops, but we have insufficient context here. Let's not go second-guessing every officer who ever uses force. Sometimes it's a necessary part of the job. Let's wait until we know something before pulling the "abuse of power" card.

*NSFW for language

lampishthingsays...

NO. HE'S GOING TO BAD COP HELL AND THAT'S FINAL.>> ^messenger:

Oh please. I'm among the first to rail against asshole cops, but we have insufficient context here. Let's not go second-guessing every officer who ever uses force. Sometimes it's a necessary part of the job. Let's wait until we know something before pulling the "abuse of power" card.
NSFW for language

messengersays...

And caps lock wins the argument again! How do you do it caps lock?>> ^lampishthing:

NO. HE'S GOING TO BAD COP HELL AND THAT'S FINAL.>> ^messenger:
Oh please. I'm among the first to rail against asshole cops, but we have insufficient context here. Let's not go second-guessing every officer who ever uses force. Sometimes it's a necessary part of the job. Let's wait until we know something before pulling the "abuse of power" card.
NSFW for language


Send this Article to a Friend



Separate multiple emails with a comma (,); limit 5 recipients






Your email has been sent successfully!

Manage this Video in Your Playlists




notify when someone comments
X

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
  
Learn More