*promote

Self promoting this video and sending it back into the queue for one more try; last queued Saturday, April 18th, 2009 11:52am PDT - promote requested by original submitter dystopianfuturetoday.

This is just annoying.

Vote witheld.

I think it's an understandably baffled response to a demonstrably baffling line of reasoning.

DID ANYBODY SEE THAT SHIRT?

5 words should suffice for anyone who's still parroting that homosexuality isn't natural.

Homosexuality is common in nature.

What's nature? Is it anything except humans? Or everything including humans?
Because if we're in it, every behavior we might have is natural.

This is just annoying.

Vote witheld as well.

upvote for spoonerism... garried to a may
-----

ok so i just watched your video...

and gay marriage just got legalized in Vermont
(and thats where i live)
so i thought i'd post a response...

because gay marriage is legal...
and im gay...
and im going to marry a gay.

...and you say in your video that gay marriage isnt natural,
but i dont think you know anything about whats natural,
because you live inside a house ,
and i saw pictures of you inside your room,
but i live outside in nature in the outdoors,
and you dont know what it is - anything -
to be about natural,
because you eat food from the - shtore,
and i eat food that i kill with a rock.

im a vegetarian and i eat plants,
but i kill all the food i eat with a rock.
i kill plants with a rock,
and i make a computer that's made out of wood
and i work on the computer thats made out of wood

your computer's made out of technology
so you shouldnt say anything about what it is to be natural and not to be natural,
because you dont know'n anything about what it is to be natural,
but i live in vermont and i use a computer that's made out of wood and rocks

i eat computers that are made out of wood and rocks,
and i use plants that are made out of computers,
and you dont know anything about what it is to be natural,
and you should get married to a gay,
cause im gonna get married to a gay,
and if you got garried to may to the,
you would learn anything about what it is to be natural.

so if you wanna learn anything about what it is to be natural,
you should go to the store,
you should buy wood that is made out of rocks,
and you should kill the computers with trees,
and then you would know anything about what it is to be natural,
and i dont know anything about what it is to be natural,
because im not gay and i got married to a gay.

if you get married to a gay
then you wont be gay anymore
because the gays get married
and then they become straight
because they are married to each other
and marraige isn't between a man and a woman
so one of them is going to turn into a woman or a man
if their either woman or man, not either -eending already -
and they're gonna get married to a gay.

so if you dont get married to a gay
then you wont know'n anything about what it is to be natural
and im gonna get married to the gay natural
im gonna be made out of wood
into the gatrolininay
are you gonna get married to the gay to the natural
gay intothenrararararangakinchilalpachek

>> ^chilaxe:
5 words should suffice for anyone who's still parroting that homosexuality isn't natural.

Homosexuality is common in nature.

This is far less annoying to me than many sift regulars. *cough* Olbermann *cough*

Furthermore he makes a very good point.

Post-punditry debate. I like it. It takes all the absurdity of our political culture and splays it for all to witness.

I thought this was hilarious, as I often go on rants of the sort that he's ranting about in the rant that he's ranting. Because I like to rant and I'm going to rant because you don't like my ranting and what you don't like is what I like because I rant with ranting that rants your unlikeable ranting against ranting which is some sort of metaphor or hyperbole or a metaphoric hyperbolic ranting of irony and I am not getting married to a gay because I'm not a gay and I don't want to be turned into a woman when I get married to a woman because that would make me gay and then my wife would turn into a man if I was a woman and then we'd be straight but then I'd be a woman forever or at least until I get divorced and re-marry a woman cause hopefully then I'd turn back into a man and not have her turn into a man because then I'd still be a woman but not gay but married to a woman who became a man.

>> ^doogle:
This is just annoying.
Vote witheld as well.


+1

I appreciate the sentiment and the idea, but I didn't like the execution at all. Maybe I'm just not in the right mood, but imo this one's already overrated.

*edit* dang, upvoted when mean to downvote

Comment hidden because you are ignoring dag.(show it anyway)

I love it.

Up vote for the t-shirt alone....well that and I think that sort of humor is cute...

I suspect...he required skill to do that.

upvote for confusing me.

It is hilarious.

Did he say he was gay for wood?

Upvote for lack of medication. Yes it's possible, gay people can have a crazy cat lady/man as well =)

upvote for poem of the year

isnt there a news story in poland now about a zoo being dissapointed because a male elephant they bought to get the female elephants pregnant is only interested in the other male elephants?

He'd be a good auctioneer.

of course gay marriage isn't natural; marriage isn't natural.

I love this! He is cute too

I think this is brilliant in a very witty, intelligent and insightful way.

It doesn't even matter if he's a straight man who eats processed meats ordered on the internet from a store and delivered in a van made in a factory by robots to a robot who prepares the food in a microwave for him, liquidizes it and feeds it to him through a plastic tube.

Upvote!

Con-ju-gate the words.

Stream of Con-scious-ness.

It seems to me he's running in circles.

I get the idea, I see why it's supposed to be funny, I see how it's supposed to be targeting those who make as equally ridiculous arguments against gay marriage.

BUT.

This was boring, unfunny, does nothing to win over anyone who is anti gay marriage... and is probably getting more upvotes based on it being a video discussing a good cause rather than actually being a good video.

I mean... that's a lot of votes for something this... nothing.

Not only this guy is a RAGING FAGGOT (not that there's anything wrong with that), but he is annoying, too...downvote


"I love this! He is cute too"
no

^Keitholbermann?!

^Truth:
Why would you put RAGING FAGGOT in all caps if there isn't anything wrong with that?

Nope sorry.


He could have just said "marriage isn't natural to begin with, you stupid fucking religionist!"

edit - and I fail to see what's so hilarious about this. (Besides his nose.)

^It's a bit esoteric, and not for everyone I guess. He makes his point that very little of present day life could be considered natural by the standards of the anti-gay crowd, and then he deconstructs and reconstructs the words in clever e.e. Cummings-esque poem. Don't worry about it.

Pretty far from clever =P

just like the people he's debating to... so u see how that works now

>> ^Truth:
Not only this guy is a RAGING FAGGOT (not that there's anything wrong with that), but he is annoying, too...downvote


Not only is your mother a RAGING WHORE (not that there's anything wrong with that), but she is annoying, too...downvote.

This is hilarious.

Why am I getting down voted and insulted? I didn't tell any lies, did I?

That's it, guys. You're going down!

Comment hidden because you are ignoring dag.(show it anyway)

^on you. [kiss]

If you didn't exactly lie, I think it was kind of a disonest comment. You call the guy a name which is obviously not meant to praise, then you immediately go on to say there isn't anything wrong with that.

You can't have your cake and eat it too.

Whether a gay union is 'natural' or not is irrelevant. If a person believes in a religious moral code then there is no value in describing an act as natural or unnatural. Religious morality itself is unnatural. Right and wrong do not exist in nature.

All that should matter from a religious persective is the inherent morality of a person's actions. If an act is moral then it is good. If an act is immoral then it should be abandoned. Judeo-Christianity (in general) believes sexual impurity of any kind is immoral. There is no need to justify that position. It is what it is. The argument over the secular benefits of marriage is an entirely different matter.

What is exactly dishonest in calling a fag a fag?

This is a fine little small pond video. I don't understand why it has more than 100 votes. This is the kind of thing that should be barely peeking out of the queue--not be at the top of the list. I suppose this is right up there with that video of the girl with the huge eyes who just blinked at the camera...

Fuck you Winston for making me upvote your comment. I still hate you personally.

Truth.. dude... because you're being derogatory... you can't be technical with such an obviously powerful word, unless you're legitmately confused... in which case.. to clarify:

it's because the intent seems skewed toward derogatory unless you know without doubt it's not... it just slips to that route... ya know???

which you do, you're just being A jerk.

'raging faggot' not only implies that the person embodies STRONGLY, with INTENSITY, the characteristics of a faggot as defined solely in negative dispargements through innuendo... it implies you feel it is important to place a strong emphasis on that.

that's why we know exactly what you meant by it, and although not all your comments are as asinine (my fav word), don't spread your fucking nonsense here. this is the internet. have some respect. haha.

When I posted this, it had about 1700 youtube views, and now it's got over 45,000, with VS giving the most clicks.

"Gay marriage isn't natural."

"Neither is the internet, get off it."

Simple.