TDS - The Gingrich Who Stole South Carolina

Newt Gingrich turns his campaign around by exploiting South Carolinian voters' anger at the media's supposed victimization of the Right.

Also, John King really did f!@# that up. Where's Jim Lehrer when you need him?
dagsays...

Comment hidden because you are ignoring dag.(show it anyway)

I think it's both cool and important. Speaks to character. I like to think I would feel the same way if it was a Dem. I hope so.>> ^GeeSussFreeK:

Still don't think it is cool to bring up in a debate (as it isn't debatable among all the candidates), but I'm upvoting because hes swine.

GeeSussFreeKsays...

>> ^dag:

I think it's both cool and important. Speaks to character. I like to think I would feel the same way if it was a Dem. I hope so.>> ^GeeSussFreeK:
Still don't think it is cool to bring up in a debate (as it isn't debatable among all the candidates), but I'm upvoting because hes swine.



Right, the subject of conversation, yes. But what is the point in a debate? A debate is about debating positions on issues; that isn't an issue someone could debate him on. Could unless we are going to have the other candidates pipe in on his failed marriages (failed in a most disgusting fashion). IMO, that is what the 24 hour news circuits are for, the debates are those few heralding places we get to try to see what their views are on issues (though this is mostly a farce too). Be that as it may, I like to compartmentalize my farces!

dagsays...

Comment hidden because you are ignoring dag.(show it anyway)

I take your point. maybe it should have been a broader question about family values and hypocrisy. >> ^GeeSussFreeK:

>> ^dag:
I think it's both cool and important. Speaks to character. I like to think I would feel the same way if it was a Dem. I hope so.>> ^GeeSussFreeK:
Still don't think it is cool to bring up in a debate (as it isn't debatable among all the candidates), but I'm upvoting because hes swine.


Right, the subject of conversation, yes. But what is the point in a debate? A debate is about debating positions on issues; that isn't an issue someone could debate him on. Could unless we are going to have the other candidates pipe in on his failed marriages (failed in a most disgusting fashion). IMO, that is what the 24 hour news circuits are for, the debates are those few heralding places we get to try to see what their views are on issues (though this is mostly a farce too). Be that as it may, I like to compartmentalize my farces!

GeeSussFreeKsays...

@dag Ohhh ya, that would of been perfect actually! They could of set up a BBQ and roasted him then; cause you didn't have to wait for the moderator to miss his chance, you had X number of other candidates ready to pounce (I don't know if that is Mr. Paul's style, but he has been nothing but faithful for longer than I have existed)!

HaricotVertsays...

It certainly did in John Edwards' case, and it didn't even have to be brought up in a debate. So it goes with both sides of the aisle.

>> ^dag:

I think it's both cool and important. Speaks to character. I like to think I would feel the same way if it was a Dem. I hope so.>> ^GeeSussFreeK:
Still don't think it is cool to bring up in a debate (as it isn't debatable among all the candidates), but I'm upvoting because hes swine.


Send this Article to a Friend



Separate multiple emails with a comma (,); limit 5 recipients






Your email has been sent successfully!

Manage this Video in Your Playlists




notify when someone comments
X

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
  
Learn More