Sheep gets its revenge!

That should teach her!
BoneRemakesays...

>> ^ForgedReality:

Stupid motherfucking brat. Where the fuck are your parents? They should be shot alongside you. Cure the problem at its source and prevent its spreading.


Wow, did you misplace your meds ? or switch them up or something?

shagen454says...

That actually brings back memories. I think I was about twelve hiking in the moors when a bull charged us and kept us at bay on a pile of big rocks for about fifteen agonizing minutes.

This also reminds me of a time when I was maybe seven or eight in one of the Carolinas and I pissed off a goose in the sort of fashion this little one is and as we were going up some stairs it chased after us up the stairs; my mom had no idea what was going on and it ended up biting her on her ass. And I laughed and laughed and laughed....

gharksays...

Looks like a Texel, one of the sheep breeds my uncle farms in NZ - the Rams (this one appears to be a Ram) can be quite aggressive, luckily they are like zombies, you just need to shoot them in the head and they usually stay down.

alien_conceptsays...

Can someone get this kids channel thing to stick. As far as I'm aware the channel is for videos suitable for children, not if they've got them in it. Bit vague I know, But I'd love to get my hands on that channel and sort it out once and for all!

*nochannel

*catsanddogs *comedy *fail *terrible *nature

garmachisays...

>> ^alien_concept:

Can someone get this kids channel thing to stick. As far as I'm aware the channel is for videos suitable for children, not if they've got them in it. Bit vague I know, But I'd love to get my hands on that channel and sort it out once and for all!
nochannel
catsanddogs comedy fail terrible nature


I was thinking that this would totally be appropriate for kids, if not for the fact that the first comment below the video calls the girl a cunt.

BoneRemakesays...

>> ^alien_concept:

>> ^BoneRemake:
kids
Comments have f/a (fuck all) to do with channel designation.

Why have you done that? This is not clear cut suitable for kids, fucks sake. Sesame Street yes, little girls being mean to animals, really?


I find it educational for other kids to watch another childs learning factor in life. Through this action children watching will/might connect the dots between treating animals with respect.

I did not call it because it has a child in it, I surely do think its fit for kids to watch and learn, the focus to you might be the mistreatment of a barnyard animal but to me its a tool.

*discuss ! ( always wanted to do that !)

alien_conceptsays...

@BoneRemake

I totally agree with that, why not let kids see how their thoughtless actions can be mean. BUT, this channel essentially (if it were handled properly) should be somewhere where you wouldn't have to veto anything first

Boise_Libsays...

When I first saw this video in Sift Talk I thought, " why the hell does this one need to be discussed?" I see now, a channel discussion, okay.

I agree with @alien_concept here.

Yes, @BoneRemake, this could easily be used as a valuable learning tool for kids--but, as with all learning tools, that learning should include mediation by that kids adults. If the kids channel is defined as something unsupervised kids should be able to watch then this video doesn't belong.

Now on to the definition of this channel, I will quote, "Sandbox for Sift Tots." Um...not very defining. Sift Tots? That could be interpreted as meaning some "adults" who use the site (not looking at anyone here ). If you take this as meaning "kids who sift" (which I believe is the intent) then ac is correct. But, I think a possible expansion of the definition would be helpful.

That is all.

Lannsays...

The maturity level of some kids scares me. I was showing sheep at her age. I've never seen one act that way, but then again, I wasn't a little shithead that abused animals.

garmachisays...

>> ^BoneRemake:

kids
Comments have f/a (fuck all) to do with channel designation.


I respectfully disagree. I think that the comments add quite a bit to any video, and that the entire experience of watching the video and reading the comments should lend itself to the channel designation(s). For example, if I sifted a video of a cute kitten lounging by a fan on a hot summer day and titled it Hot Pussy, it could be argued that a nsfw would apply based on the title. If I work at a place that frowns on F-bombs and sexually explicit language, it would not be appropriate to have the words "Hot Pussy" at the top of my screen, even if it could be argued in a court of law that the content of the video was innocuous. It would be Not Safe For Work. Likewise, a video with the word "cunt" just a few inches below the picture would not be something that most people would want their kids to see.

BoneRemakesays...

>> ^Boise_Lib:

>> ^BoneRemake:
UPVOTES FOR EVERYONE !

So, no kids channel is agreed?
If so, return the video (you've always wanted to do that too )


Oh, no I totally think you are wrong on that front. I did however come here specifically to *return it to the fold. Upvotes for everyone for a successful discuss, emphasizing the need for Channel descriptions to be present and descriptive. In your argument Boise, I think there is a little too much LIb in it.

Send this Article to a Friend



Separate multiple emails with a comma (,); limit 5 recipients






Your email has been sent successfully!

Manage this Video in Your Playlists




notify when someone comments
X

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
  
Learn More