What is the most dangerous chemical you've worked with?

<--- Pete is going to sneeze!
gharksays...

The thing I hated the most in the lab was having to constantly deal with formaldehyde - a pretty potent carcinogen. It's used in tissue preservation, so anytime you want to extract some DNA/RNA from formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) tissue you end up getting a dose of it.

The strangest thing is how in our chemistry labs all the waste chemicals from all our experiments had to be put into one big jar, so there would be this viscous, almost gooey mass of this silvery-orange-black'ish sort of toxic waste which was a combination of all the 30-40 different (already toxic) chemicals put together. That would then need to sit in the lab for a month until waste collection day arrived.

deathcowsays...

Yep I was surprised they didn't talk to uranium boy for this one. Maybe they agreed amongst themselves not to spread radioactive fear. Or maybe the exhaustive controls they have around radioactive materials means that it generally isn't a danger feel about it. Or maybe it's their limited access to anything that is ...dangerously.. radioactive. I think probably the last reason is correct.

bamdrewsays...

>> ^ghark:

The thing I hated the most in the lab was having to constantly deal with formaldehyde - a pretty potent carcinogen.



Yeah... still dealing with this myself in lab. Its so commonly used that people just messily use it like its sucrose or something.

National Toxicology Program 'Report On Carcinogens, Twelfth Edition (2011)'
pg.195
"Formaldehyde is known to be a human carcinogen based on sufficient
evidence of carcinogenicity from studies in humans and supporting
data on mechanisms of carcinogenesis. Formaldehyde was first listed
in the Second Annual Report on Carcinogens in 1981 as reasonably
anticipated to be a human carcinogen based on sufficient evidence
from studies in experimental animals. Since that time, additional
cancer studies in humans have been published, and the listing status
was changed to known to be a human carcinogen in the Twelfth Report on Carcinogens (2011)."

Bruti79says...

I think the reason why no one said any of the radioactives is because they're stable. You can deal with the radiation easily. Something that becomes sulfuric acid on contact with the water in the air, or poisonous and unstable materials, the unknown factor, I think is what makes them jump a little.

Send this Article to a Friend



Separate multiple emails with a comma (,); limit 5 recipients






Your email has been sent successfully!

Manage this Video in Your Playlists




notify when someone comments
X

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
  
Learn More