Dear parent/caretaker,
The Florida legislature has recently ruled that “classroom instruction by school personnel or third parties on sexual orientation or gender identity may not occur in kindergarten through grade 3 or in a manner that is not age appropriate or developmentally appropriate for students.”
To be in accordance with this policy, I will no longer be referring to your students with gendered pronouns. All students will be referred to as “they” or “them”. I will no longer use gendered titles like “Mr” or “Mrs” or make any reference to my husband/wife in the classroom. From now on I will be using the non gendered title “Mx”.
Furthermore I will be removing all books or instruction which refer to a person being a “husband”, “wife, “mother”, or “father”, as these are gender identities that may allude to sexual orientation. Needless to say, all books which refer to a character as “he” or “she” will also be removed from the classroom.
If you have any concerns about this policy, please feel free to contact your local Congressperson.
Thank you, Mx XXXXXXXXX
“I never thought leopards would eat my face!” sobs woman who voted for the Leopards Eating People’s Faces party. Classic
12 Comments
admiralrontonsays...Absolutely priceless.
And they should be repealing that law right about...
luxintenebrissays...blowing the pillock minds with their own petards.
ron desantis' pronouns are 'he' and 'haw'. (Colbert)
bobknight33says...A win for the fruit loop community.
newtboyjokingly says...No.
Don’t you understand?
Desantis lost.
A win for the fruit loop community.
luxintenebrisjokingly says...first, how prevalent are these gay symposiums?
been through several flights of kids and yet to hear of one elementary teacher leading a colloquy on homosexuality. very unlikely it's ever been a thing or was so mild or explained deftly it never became a thing.
and no doubt if there was, would have heard about it. case in point:
was asked, "what does 'funky stuff' in the song mean?"
"don't know sweetie. probably slang for 'love'. I'll look it up on the internet."
they listen and ask about EVERYTHING! no more Rick James on the ride home.
***come to think of it, probably wouldn't mind the help.***
JiggaJonsonsays...Teacher here. It's made-up-nonsense. I don't give a shit what gender or sexual orientation a kid is and im CERTAINLY not going to try to convince anyone to change anything about themselves.
That said, I'm going to acknowledge that gay/trans people exist in authorship and literature as it arises. You can't read someone like Whitman (Leaves of Grass, arguably America's greatest poet) and not come across references to sexuality either implicit or explicit. https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems/45472/i-sing-the-body-electric
It becomes relevant in passages like this:
5
This is the female form,
A divine nimbus exhales from it from head to foot,
It attracts with fierce undeniable attraction,
I am drawn by its breath as if I were no more than a helpless vapor, all falls aside but myself and it,
Books, art, religion, time, the visible and solid earth, and what was expected of heaven or fear’d of hell, are now consumed,
Mad filaments, ungovernable shoots play out of it, the response likewise ungovernable,
Hair, bosom, hips, bend of legs, negligent falling hands all diffused, mine too diffused,
Ebb stung by the flow and flow stung by the ebb, love-flesh swelling and deliciously aching,
Limitless limpid jets of love hot and enormous, quivering jelly of love, white-blow and delirious juice,
Bridegroom night of love working surely and softly into the prostrate dawn,
Undulating into the willing and yielding day,
Lost in the cleave of the clasping and sweet-flesh’d day.
----------------------------------
Maybe a conversation like:
"'Love flesh swelling' like he's in love with some woman and they...he...?"
"Probably not, he didn't have any serious female relationships as far as I am aware."
"But the title is 'The female form'"
"Well, it's possible, but it's not likely the case that he was talking about himself being in love with a woman. This poem is in the text but he wrote many other pieces about he-himself falling into and out of love with various men and we have letters documenting those relationships with his male significant others. Although, I'm not sure what to call them because gay marriage would have been illegal at the time. He's likely writing the poem in a way where he appreciates the female form and sees men who are drawn to it like the way I appreciate watching bees act obsessively driven to the middle of flowers. I like watching Bees in action, but that doesn't mean I'm going all pollen crazy, still I appreciate it for what it is."
-------------------
This is an example of how discussion of sexuality would come up in my classroom as I imagine it. Note how I'm not trying to convince the kid I'm talking to to turn gay like it's a big game of rainbow-red-rover or something. Nevertheless, knowing the author's sexual preference in this instance informs our understanding of the piece.
My own personal theory?
The people railing against things like this are the same shitheads that can't be bothered to read ANYTHING and instead giggle and guffaw at "hurhurhurhur he hadd'a boner" where I get to live an early stage of Idocracy.
Also, I agree that the "funky stuff" shouldn't be just avoided altogether. For goodness sake, just let teachers have the difficult conversation that everyone is avoiding. Reminds me of when Peggy Hill was struggling to say "Penis" when she was assigned sex ed.
first, how prevalent are these gay symposiums?
been through several flights of kids and yet to hear of one elementary teacher leading a colloquy on homosexuality. very unlikely it's ever been a thing or was so mild or explained deftly it never became a thing.
and no doubt if there was, would have heard about it. case in point:
was asked, "what does 'funky stuff' in the song mean?"
"don't know sweetie. probably slang for 'love'. I'll look it up on the internet."
they listen and ask about EVERYTHING! no more Rick James on the ride home.
***come to think of it, probably wouldn't mind the help.***
robdotsays...Everything republicans fear is imaginary. And the one thing they should fear,covid, that has killed a million Americans,they think is fake.
surfingytsays...all repubs got is fear of everything. repubs are cowards.
Everything republicans fear is imaginary. And the one thing they should fear,covid, that has killed a million Americans,they think is fake.
newtboysays...Now, that’s not fair nor is it true…..
….they have plenty of hatred too.
All Republicans have is xenophobia….hate and fear of the “other”.
all repubs got is fear of everything. repubs are cowards.
luxintenebrisjokingly says...sir. if you are comparing me to Peggy Hill, then...
¡mi gallo tiene un ceceo!
Teacher here. It's made-up-nonsense. I don't give a shit what gender or sexual orientation a kid is and im CERTAINLY not going to try to convince anyone to change anything about themselves.
bobknight33says...
newtboysays...Way to conflate homosexuality with pedophilia despite all studies showing the opposite is true.
https://lgbpsychology.org/html/facts_molestation.html
https://psmag.com/social-justice/do-gay-men-have-more-sexual-interest-in-children-than-straight-men-do-62127
Because I know you won't read either study, let me quote....
"Using phallometric test sensitivities to calculate the proportion of true pedophiles among various groups of sex offenders against children, and taking into consideration previously reported mean numbers of victims per offender group, the ratio of heterosexual to homosexual pedophiles was calculated to be approximately 11:1." If homosexuals were even equal in child molesting, that would be closer to 9:1.
I guess you now agree that heterosexual teachers shouldn't be in the classroom because they are more likely to be child molesters, because scientific fact overrides prejudicial opinion.
.
Discuss...
Enable JavaScript to submit a comment.