*promote

Self promoting this video and sending it back into the queue for one more try; last queued Monday, February 3rd, 2014 4:37pm PST - promote requested by original submitter Mordhaus.

Because I come to videosift to experience the same bait and switch tactics that I see on youtube. So bad.

Just as a heads up, I have not modified this video in any way. I did not insert the intro thumbnail, it was already like that when I saw it. I am in discussion as of right now to see if the video will need to be killed.

DOWNVOTE FOR FALSE ASSVERTISING!!!

No violation here and no false advertising on @Mordhaus's part. That's how the video host provided the thumbnail, so they're to blame!

Well, we frikkin' LOVED it!
"Good KIIIITY!"

BOOOOOOOO!

What about the {LONG} notification and the duration reading as 12:42?

Good point, though still not a violation, as those flags were automatically pulled based on the original YouTube video, not the TubeChopped video.

Let's see if this works:
*length=0 *notlong

A recognizable video length was not specified - ignoring length request by lucky760.

I find meatbag lucky760 to be an inadequate command-giver - ignoring all requests by lucky760.

Oh, poo.

*length=9 (approximately)

The duration of this video has been updated from 12:42 to 9 secs - length declared by lucky760.

Goddamn, MilkmanDan-It's not a violation, it's simply a foo-pax by a user who doesn't wipe his ass with a Q-tip in a circular rotation thirty times counter-clockwise after each bowel movement.

Mordhaus, simply edit your offering to reflect the correct time (manually as indicated) and the "long" designation will miraculously vanish.

Anyone else have a cricket in their trousers regarding this wonderful video embed??

*✨

Boosting this quality contribution up in the Hot Listing - declared quality by chingalera.

I never said it was a violation, I was specifically referring to the "false advertising" bit of lucky760's post. Not sure where ass-wiping comes into it.

From a sift perspective, I guess this suggests that maybe TubeChopped embeds should edit their metadata to reflect the "chopped" duration rather than the original.

Other than that, for what it is worth I found the video itself somewhat amusing, largely BECAUSE of the false advertising / bait and switch title. Not necessarily amusing enough to upvote (sorry Morhaus, just my opinion), but certainly not insulting/annoying/whatever enough to downvote (which I couldn't do even if I wanted to -- no privileges).

I'd be tempted to downvote your reaction if I could, though.

Look MilkmanDan, it was not the intention to offend you in particular, we merely leapt like a robot at an opportunity to snub a nose at rules-of-engagement relative to rules in-general and some of the more didactic pet-peeves some but not all have with regards to what we personally regard as insignificant, but that some folks seem to get bent-sideways about and begin these tiresome pedantic, didactic dull-ass comment threads.

Who cares if it's tagged incorrectly, who cares if it's marked long when it's really short? Who cares obviously some folks do and it bothers the shit outta them. There is no 'why', simply the questions of how what, when and who had a part in creating these inconsequential concerns in some people that it matters at all?

That you wanted to down-vote a comment suggests perhaps someone thought someone else was crude, mean, rude, or too direct or forward in their protest. We can live with that, as well as the supercilious reasoning for your not voting this video up, in our LTHO.

At the end of the day, you got yer cute kitty dragging someone's be-bootied -with-shoe-cover foot being dragged up close-in to a mischievous, playful cat's clawing with head-banging glee, and it's AS cute, as that slammin' chick's back-side in the screen-shot, unless you are from some other planet where rippin' asses don't stir your loins a bit, be you male or female, gay, straight or otherwise.

Glad you dug the misdirection as much as myself an we thank you for your sincere feedback.

Personally, I vote shit up based on the fact that the original submitter enjoyed the video enough to embed it, and at the end of the day it makes folks happy about contributing to the site and therefore the entire sift community benefits.

What really IS an affirmative vote anyway, but a gesture of goodwill and kindness directed outward from the wealth of consideration one has for oneself?

Do unto others, then run away as fast as you can...to paraphrase the rule.

Oh and the ass-wiping analogy was meant for all the OCD retentive types, the kind of people where everything has to be just-so or their fucking heads will explode....perhaps I should check a mirror??

This is a serious issue in need of resolving. I don't care how long it takes - it must be fixed.

This may not be a violation of videosift terms, but it is clearly a cat doing a very poor job of removing a sock. He needs to pull down around the ankle first or the overall traction of the entire garment will continue to overpower his small muscles and frame.

this is that same cat video every time!!!

Did you check all of the Pussy Shaking videos? I'm sure one of them has a different kitty in it. When you find it please let me know.

*related=http://videosift.com/video/Ultimate-BEST-VINES-2014-Compilation-Jan-Vine-Compilation (whole video of Vine videos)

Ultimate BEST VINES 2014 Compilation (Jan. Vine Compilation) has been added as a related post - related requested by ant.

Did I just stumble onto imgur?