Well, I can see why someone gave him a microphone. Boneheaded miscreant. The Fourth Estate has been taken over by chicanery for entertainment value alone.

One more:



I find this one interesting as the storms on the east coast happened simultaneously with the earthquakes on the west coast.

I KNEW IT ALL ALONG!!!

this was so stupid it remotely gave me a weather-headache

Moving this video to CelebrateApathy's personal queue. It failed to receive enough votes to get sifted up to the front page within 2 days.

So, if this is a false flag, does that mean we are about to wage war on clouds, wind and water?

If Obama wanted to disrupt the election, wouldn't it be better to aim the HAARP blaster at conservative states like Texas or Oklahoma? Are conservatives in control of the HAARP blaster?

*promote

Self promoting this video and sending it back into the queue for one more try; last queued - promote requested by original submitter CelebrateApathy.

The prospect seems so outlandish but with all the disinformation we are fed, It's hard to know for sure.
Every fiber in my being says this is the most batshit crazy thinking I've ever seen.

But if it's so crazy then:
• Why do the experiments continue?
• Why did the highest level of the US military buy out every piece of HAARP and classify it at the highest level?
• Why won't they inform the public as to what they are really doing?

Perhaps some declassification would still the rumors a bit.
I'm not a conspiracy theorist but I do have trust-issues when it comes to Governments and Power.

*talks

Adding video to channels (Talks) - requested by ant.

So wait, this guy is actually serious? Really?

Nah....no way....really?

Why would Obama/Gates target the east coast, an area that tends to vote democrat.

UNLESS THAT'S WHAT THEY WANT US TO THINK!

sigh...stupid DJ is stupid.

So... Hurricane Katrina... worked out well for Bush.

People like this are fucking scary. These conspiracy nutballs who think EVERYTHING is a conspiracy. EVERYTHING is being controlled by the governments or secret cabals of hooded men.

He keeps harping on (haarping on?) about the storm being a distraction.

Isn't his batshit crazy bullshit really a distraction, rather than focusing on real issues?

This guy is a moron if he thinks they can actually control hurricanes as much as he thinks they can. When you do a cursory bit of reading you see that they have theories, they think they can lessen the impact of hurricanes (in theory), they have been trying for decades but never had conclusive proof one way or the other.

The bullshit that he keeps spouting as fact gets lapped up by the conspiracy nutjobs.

Fuck this man annoys the shit out of me. Not least of which because I have at least one friend who watches this dick and believes his shit.

*comedy

Adding video to channels (Comedy) - requested by MrFisk.

must be really tiring when every damn thing that happens is some kind of conspiracy.

>> ^PostalBlowfish:

must be really tiring when every damn thing that happens is some kind of conspiracy.


It's sort of like being a true believer or a devote anyone. It's really tough to explain things away so much, they have to account for new advances all the time, new information.

wow hes a complete lunatic..

*controversy

Adding video to channels (Controversy) - requested by MrFisk.

And seriously, Idiot? People who choose to deal with issues regarding governmental control of weather in order to rig national elections are now idiots? Shock jocks aren't always looking to increase their ratings 'on air' if they say stupid and outlandish shit. Fuck, he could have had a lobotomy for all you know.

My point being that you shouldn't judge based on narrow stereotypes when you are literally clueless about the person in question.

*quality

Boosting this quality contribution up in the Hot Listing - declared quality by MrFisk.

Q: Why do governments continue with experiments if there's not much truth to them?
A: Men who stare at goats (a few ppl fooled by ideas and passion can easily consume some government resources)
A: Magicians (show the audience one thing while you do another)
A: Bias perception (Misinterpretation of the results)
A: Progression (Legitimate achievements in technological advancements)

Either pick what makes you comfortable (mentally lazy), or utilize your critical thinking (worth breeding)

A rational mind staring into darkness will begin to see shapes and movements that aren't really there. It's due to mental cheat sheets, where the mind attempts to understand that which it doesn't by using current knowledge, assumptions, imagination and internal values/preferences/emotions (gross simplification).

An irrational mind more easily sees whatever is familiar/preferred to be seen. Those who stare long enough can become very difficult to persuade with an alternative view or bring back to a more rational position. (it's why teaching young humans 'what' to think is so much more defining than 'how' to think, re stubborn beliefs)

Yes humans are capable of some seriously great feats, but if you genuinely think that weather can be "controlled" to the extent he's referring to (while disregarding the far greater impacts that would occur globally for every smaller influence) then you're not likely to listen to reason, rather then continue to perceive that which you're predetermined to think.

Also it might help to listen to how he's making his points. It's psychological warfare, he's seeding you and getting you to defeat your own rational thought, poorly i might add, but still the attempt is there.
Why? By only making statements, your 100,000's year old critical thinking system will instinctively aim to challenge every point that isn't previously accepted (like how a cat instinctively chases a running non-threat target), so he mixes in the questions, the same questions, as repetition is the best form of learning (mind-raping)

And just to fuck with yas: if you 'knew' something crazy to be true, and as you spoke about it you could hear the crazy.. how would you convince a friend, a parent and a stranger?

Complete brain dead tool with a cadre of even less intelligent/informed followers, but I must say, I really dislike the way the video was edited. I doubt they changed his message, but I can't even be sure HE said this insanity now because they edited it so poorly that he could have actually been railing against people who think this insanity and they edited and changed what he said.
It's the same as 'reality' TV, where if you can't see a non-cut away, smooth (no jumps or jerks) shot of the lips of the person talking, you can't have any idea if they actually said what's presented, because they cut up audio/video to have them say whatever the producers like. That's fine with me, except when they present it as 'reality', 'fact', or 'news', that's where I take issue.

If you KNOW it to be true, it's not crazy, it only sounds that way (or you are crazy, then all bets are off).
For you to really KNOW, you must have information that explains why what SOUNDS crazy is actually factual, and that should be simple to explain to others once you know the facts.
That's one way to determine if something that sounds crazy likely is, if there's no verifiable factual information to explain why something that sounds crazy is true, only belief, hyperbole, and implication, it's likely the stance is just crazy.