Let me know when the prosecuting attorney for a state is after em eh?


Oh wait, that's already happenin to ya' boi in New York. In my experience, the thing that'll get u kicked out of the rich kids' club is stealing money from them.

bewb your submissions are hilariously struggling. u like a fish without water I'm in tears. Whenever starting to feel bad for you but naw this is great laughs

Hint- What the right is saying about the Durham filing is not true. Durham has been forced to publicly call them out for intentionally lying about it.

He carefully leaves out the most important part about the network traffic they took from the office of the President.

The lawyer, Sussman, is being accused of lying in a Sept. 2016 interview about whom all he was working for.

He was indeed working for the Clinton campaign amongst other groups. It also appears there is compelling evidence that he was working with Tech staff with access to Whitehouse internet data.

Remember though, the interview is in September 2016, while the sitting president was Barack Obama. The lawyer was working for the Clinton campaign and presumably the DNC, because they were investigating the Russian hack of their email and computer systems...

But Fox and anyone willing to be compliant like Sen Cruz are tripping over themselves to make sure they fuel the false conception that Trump was spied on in the white house.

If you watch Cruz words here, he chooses them terrifically carefully to leave ambiguous the timing of the allegations about the whitehouse data to leave the impression by omission.

Moving this video to bobknight33's personal queue. It failed to receive enough votes to get sifted up to the front page within 2 days.

@bobknight33 , why do you insist on posting such dishonest implications and propaganda?
If 1% of the allegations against Trump are true (hint, they are) then he and all his cultists are anti American terrorists that should die in Gitmo.

What is in the Durham filing is NOT what the right is claiming, Durham had to publicly say exactly that, knowing morons like you can’t read what it does say…there was no spying on (ex-)president Trump, what’s described ended before he was president.
(but let’s remember how interested Trump was in having the Russians spy on Clinton, which they did at his direction with his campaigns involvement and for his political gains. Let’s remember how much you loved it. Let’s also not forget he wasn’t prosecuted because they decided he and Don jr were too dumb and ignorant to know they were committing treason, not because it didn’t happen).