Dita Von Teese- Striptease Martini Glass Performance

*She is Not Naked in the Video..And This is MTV Europe...I think she is very sophisticated and gorgeous....


Dita Von Teese (born Heather Renée Sweet on September 28, 1972) is a popular American burlesque artist, model and actress.

She is one of the instigators of the burlesque revival and has been a considerable factor in bringing burlesque to mainstream attention. Her fame increased during her relationship with Marilyn Manson, to whom she was married from 2005 to 2007.


It was during this time at the strip club that she began some glamour modeling, before she eventually became a fetish model. Her retro pin-up look, frequently emulating Bettie Page in photo shoots, set her apart from most other fetish models.

Her official website, often referred to as one of the first model sites on the internet, was created in 1992.[1] Von Teese has maintained meticulous care to own the copyright to the majority of her images, very aware of what became of models, such as Bettie Page, who did not.
spoco2says...

She really knows how to make insanely sexy shapes with her body.

Do pasties amuse anyone else? I mean, that's the entire exposed breast there, with a little something the same shape as the nipple its covering... and it's considered ok... remove those tiny little pasties, expose just the nipple and suddenly it's gone from tasteful tease to porn.

Funny how censorship and the puritanical nature of the West sees these things.

Personally, I do prefer burlesque, that hint of what you can't see does make it even more sexy, it's a tease in the extreme...

10722says...

Yes.. she is incredibly sexy.

It's good that she avoided the blonde bimbo look,but it's a shame she still felt the need to enlarge her breasts (or those are the firmest, most widely spaced natural breasts of that size I have ever seen)

Sketchsays...

I'm always happy to see true teasing burlesque continued. It's far more stylish and sexy than what goes on at modern strip clubs where it's all about cash and nastiness.

Of course, that still doesn't keep me from blowing my... cash... at the clubs.

dagsays...

Comment hidden because you are ignoring dag.(show it anyway)

Stimulating, artistic but not quite arousing in that way, at least for me. I vote not porn - but it's nearing that invisible gray line.

My nerdy side wants to point out that this a courtship display. The magpies out my window do the same thing.

pipp3355says...

funny.. i'm surprised this was let get to the top 15.. i've noticed the sift users becoming generally more tolerant of content over the last year or so..i remember there was a big kerfuffle about 2 years ago on the sift about a film which was created as a 'work of art'.. but it was eventually deleted from the sift cuz ppl thought it was more porn than art...

James Roesays...

It would be one thing if this was a video of nubile coeds cavorting in wet t-shirt contests. The amount of skill involved in this performance makes it a performance. How many times did she have to run through that to be able to do it that seamlessly. I think her corset must have 30 eye hooks. She also has her timing down beautiful. She struts, strikes a pose holds it, and then on beat struts elsewhere on the stage.

At any rate I would agree that it is approaching the edge of decency, if decency is defined by what most suburban god fearing Americans find tolerable.

dagsays...

Comment hidden because you are ignoring dag.(show it anyway)

There is definitely a difference between this and porn - it's hard to pin down but I know it when I see it.

It has to do with exploitation, production for sexual gratification, the will of the person performing and artistic merit.

The Wii girl was closer to porn than this.

Zonbiesays...

>> ^dag:
There is definitely a difference between this and porn - it's hard to pin down but I know it when I see it.
It has to do with exploitation, production for sexual gratification, the will of the person performing and artistic merit.
The Wii girl was closer to porn than this.


Exactly - Pornography is done purely for sexual pleasure, often very graphic and sexually explicit. Erotica on the otherhand, often protrays sexuality and human anatomy often to high art aspirations (such as this performance)
Human anatomy is not porn, and it shouldn't be "indescent"

I refer back to my sifttalk http://wtf.videosift.com/talk/Survey-Sex-and-Gay-Kissing-are-Worse-Than-Severed-Heads
about twisted sense of morals

deedub81says...

A video of a lady removing her clothing and dancing around in a giant martini glass is porn. To me, erotica and porn are the same thing. They both have the same purpose: to make money by turning you on.

P.S. I wouldn't let any of you babysit my children.

deedub81says...

^If it looks like she's naked, she might as well be naked.

If I call somebody a motherfRucker from across the street, I might as well be saying the real thing.

If I tell a co-worker that she has "nice Sboobs" do you think the judge is going to side with me in the sexual harassment case?

"Technically she's not naked."

Technically, I didn't say boob.

Send this Article to a Friend



Separate multiple emails with a comma (,); limit 5 recipients






Your email has been sent successfully!

Manage this Video in Your Playlists




notify when someone comments
X

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
  
Learn More