Yogisays...

She's an attractive girl, what's up with this Naturally-Occurring supermodel thing though? What's the difference between that and just a beautiful girl?

lucky760said:

[The censored version of] this video has over 47 million views on YouTube. That's incredible.

The naturally-occurring supermodel is a very rare thing. See also:

Samuel Bayer art
Treats! Magazine photos
Treats! Magazine shoot
Treats! Magazine Behind the Scenes

(Naturally this artsy stuff passes dagwood's test.)

Lannsays...

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder but her portions go FAR beyond any average female body. I mean how many women do you see walking around like that? Not saying that's a bad thing or that anything is wrong with her body. Some people are just naturally different than the rest even when it comes to extremes.

To reach "supermodel status" women unfortunately have to have extreme measurements which do rarely occur naturally. Not just a pretty face.

Yogisaid:

She's an attractive girl, what's up with this Naturally-Occurring supermodel thing though? What's the difference between that and just a beautiful girl?

Yogisays...

I met a girl who has ridiculously large natural breasts that need heavy duty bras. She also was thin, as in rail like thin, even thinner than this girl Emily. Also quite an attractive face. She tried modeling but for some reason hasn't gotten much traction. I have to wonder if it's something to do with no nudity or politics.

Lannsaid:

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder but her portions go FAR beyond any average female body. I mean how many women do you see walking around like that? Not saying that's a bad thing or that anything is wrong with her body. Some people are just naturally different than the rest even when it comes to extremes.

To reach "supermodel status" women unfortunately have to have extreme measurements which do rarely occur naturally. Not just a pretty face.

lucky760says...

@Yogi - I use the term "supermodel" for want of a better term, but @Lann hit the nail on the head.

My comment wasn't as much about her beauty, which is definitely debatable, as much as how her body is unrealistic from every angle and and her facial features seem sculpted. Her body and face look like they could only have been constructed in Photoshop or on a plastic surgeon's table, but it seems she just hit the genetic lottery (in the category of aesthetics at least).

I really like the style of the video; I love how it feels so 80s. I'd never heard the song or seen the video before seeing the original version (before Jimmy Kimmel was edited out):


siftbotsays...

This video has been flagged as having an embed that is Region Blocked to not function in certain geographical locations - declared blocked by aaronfr.

Lannsays...

There are a lot of different variables. Just like with actors, talent or looks isn't going to guarantee fame. You need a good agency, right about of exposure and even then there are no guarantees.

Yogisaid:

I met a girl who has ridiculously large natural breasts that need heavy duty bras. She also was thin, as in rail like thin, even thinner than this girl Emily. Also quite an attractive face. She tried modeling but for some reason hasn't gotten much traction. I have to wonder if it's something to do with no nudity or politics.

robbersdog49says...

She is spectacularly beautiful. Wow.

lucky760said:

[The censored version of] this video has over 47 million views on YouTube. That's incredible.

The naturally-occurring supermodel is a very rare thing. See also:

Samuel Bayer art
Treats! Magazine photos
Treats! Magazine shoot
Treats! Magazine Behind the Scenes

(Naturally this artsy stuff passes dagwood's test.)

Send this Article to a Friend



Separate multiple emails with a comma (,); limit 5 recipients






Your email has been sent successfully!

Manage this Video in Your Playlists




notify when someone comments
X

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
  
Learn More