Comment hidden because you are ignoring dag. (show it anyway)

We need a solution to allow for any iframe embed. Not for everyone - as it opens a huge security hole, but for privileged members.

What else goes in your craw ?

>> ^dag:

We need a solution to allow for any iframe embed. Not for everyone - as it opens a huge security hole, but for privileged members.


iframes is the default a lot of video sites are handling their videos (with some like teamcoco have as their only option). Will this be something that will be incorporated soon?

If iframe is a security hole (I'm assuming based on the fact that I could make an iframe out of anything and claim it was a video), why not just allow for a domain acceptance list? Also, couldn't star members of a certain level or otherwise approved members manage this acceptance list?

Dunno, but smartarse comments get my goat.>> ^BoneRemake:

What else goes in your craw ?

Comment hidden because you are ignoring dag. (show it anyway)

That's a good idea.>> ^Stingray:

>> ^dag:
We need a solution to allow for any iframe embed. Not for everyone - as it opens a huge security hole, but for privileged members.

iframes is the default a lot of video sites are handling their videos (with some like teamcoco have as their only option). Will this be something that will be incorporated soon?
If iframe is a security hole (I'm assuming based on the fact that I could make an iframe out of anything and claim it was a video), why not just allow for a domain acceptance list? Also, couldn't star members of a certain level or otherwise approved members manage this acceptance list?

So @dag, when will be implemented? In the next version?

And I want credit, thanks. If I hadn't posted this carefully worded critique, we never would have reached this conclusion.

Comment hidden because you are ignoring dag. (show it anyway)

We'll look at it for the next version. Honestly it might be better just to let privileged members go open slather.