hmmmmm. lesse.don't really care, personally.....way to go wingnut!.....uhhhh, keep those votes averaging at least 36.7666666666666666

23.35

24.3 here

Even I (the former Sift statistician) don't have those figures to hand!

it would be nice to have a "published / discarded" ratio.

btw 19.03 more or less

edit: 21.19 actually. i counted the wrong value

According to my 30 seconds of copy paste, and spreadsheet....
DeputyDog       27.8 avg (426 videos)
mlx             23.2 avg (431 videos)
plastiquemonkey 23.3 avg (425 videos)
Farhad2000      17.0 avg (487 videos)
<I>(By votes_received/rating)

I've been pushing for a "votes received" to be included in the top_users page forever now.. And it is in your profile, so it should be easy to pull.

Missed me 23.48 avg (85 videos)

Although the stats are slightly skewed, due to quality Sift Talk posts adding to the rating; and negative votes on published Sifts counting to the total too!

21.218390804597701149425287356322 to be exact

I've never tried to find out. Mine barely get published pretty much

25.65, i guess my recent Conan submission helped

[edit]
This is confusing I received 1498 so that's actually 22.69.

Clearly I suck when it comes to Sift Efficiency.

Woo, I'm a total underachiever- 18.97

BTW: Way to spawn a *quality penis-measuring competition! Oh well, we all know that the best sifts don't always get the most votes. Segovia, anybody?

Gold Star member djsunkid has awarded eric3579 one published post for this quality Sift Talk contribution.

The newbie's got 31.48 per video, not including queued vids. Of course, I've only got 27 published so far.

You can always upload Dawkins and Randi playing with kittens if you need more votes.

heh....that way funny....

I'm tempted to email dawkins and ask him to record a video of himself playing with kittens on youtube. I would totally win videosift, i think.