It's a good channel idea, but I think 'fire' would be the better name. Easier to invoke too.

Rock it out, hombre!

DAMMIT!!! I've been keeping my own fire channel idea a secret forever. But you're a cool guy and at this rate I'll get to diamond by about 2050. So I'll support you...

And I agree with Hybrid that it should be called fire. Combustion sounds limiting and then people are just going to get in more arguments over what belongs there. Fire pretty much covers it.

Comment hidden because you are ignoring dag. (show it anyway)

I like fire - or explosion.

Just make the damn channel already. Blankfist wants to submit this one ASAP.

I like the explosions channel, or all encompassing combustion channel. Please make it so!

*boom

Adding video to channels (combustion) - requested by dotdude.

Alright alright, fire it will be.

But what when @ant wants to make *fireant.. did any of you stop to think about ant??

^gwiz665:

But what when @<a rel="nofollow" href="http://videosift.com/member/ant" title="member since March 2nd, 2006" class="profilelink"><strong style="color: rgb(0, 136, 0);">ant wants to make fireant.. did any of you stop to think about ant??


"Flame on!" Heh heh, you said fire.

If VS has fire and water channels, then can we have earth (or as Will Smith says "Earf") and air too?

A tribute: http://videosift.com/video/Throbbin-watches-Wax-s-California-video

Voting for this poll ended with the majority of users voting Hell Yeah.

*exothermic?

what about non-chemical explosions: nukes, novae, lightning etc?

*fire