Sure Sure, But I've seen quite a lot on this, and explained in more depth by more educated people in a simpler fashion and using microscopic video.

This guy trys, and the animation is interesting but it's like reading a book with every second page missing. You don't know what you're missing unless you already know it.

Or, in better terms, this is like a book report made about a book he's read lately. I appreciate the study which has gone into it, but it's very paraphrased.... which is sort of his style.

Here is the order to create a special council and have he/she investigate: https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/967231/download

Who was president in May 2017
Who was the majority in Congress in 2017?
Who was the majority in the Senate in May 2017?
Who appointed Rod rosenstein ?
Who was president and signed off on this in May 2017?
Republican Republican republican Republican

Now that the report that the special council generated says that the only reason the president wasn't prosecuted was because he was the president, now, there's all sorts of questions of 'where did this reporter originate?'

There's all sorts of questions about political affiliations and other bullshit. But the special council's office and the investigation is the result of a REPUBLICAN congress and a REPUBLICAN senate and a REPUBLICAN attorney general and a REPUBLICAN FUCKING PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP and a REPUBLICAN former FBI director.

I'm so sorry that the results of said investigation are things that you want to shove down the memory hole, but facts are facts. Stop acting like a fucking zealot.

I knew i had seen that tongue on Andy Milonakis Twitch stream some time ago. https://www.twitch.tv/karacorvus/clip/DreamyTiredSquidBIRB?filter=clips&range=all&sort=time

Please don't count my lack of condemnation in this instance as an endorsement. I am sure there is plenty to call Jim Bakker on. I know he did some very despicable (and illegal) things in the 80s and 90s. He supposedly repented of them but I haven't investigated to see whether that is true or not. I definitely wouldn't trust his theology after watching this video.

The disturbing nature of the video is a phenomenon we in the church call "Charismania". It comes from the charismatic church, which has largely become apostate from biblical Christianity by embracing experience over truth. Many of them do nothing else but follow around people like Rick Joyner to hear tell of some new vision or to have a supernatural experience in one of his meetings. I know you don't believe in the supernatural, but they are having a supernatural experience when you see them flop all over the place and jerk spasmodically. It's a real experience but it isn't from God.

I would never recommend anyone listen to anything like this. Instead, people need to systematically learn the bible for themselves so they can evaluate these sorts of claims and recognize them for what they are.

Security don't seem trained for that sort of thing at all. They took maybe 2.5-3mins to respond then stood around for a while before doing SFA. They even let the "attacker" who had been restrained by the public walk right up to the woman he had just assaulted which could have easily turned violent again.

I really would've liked a zoomed-out perspective. Can't at all figure out what the plane is actually doing in 3 dimensions. Is it sort of a sideways loop?

I'm assuming it's a hobby, sort of like doomsday prepping. It's mostly popular with people who have a very poor grasp of statistics.

Anyone know what the wooden thingummy in the background that looks sort of like a loom is?

ed: Wait... figured it out. It's an airplane. Dude has an interesting basement/garage whatever.

ed2: Er... maybe.

The King Air at 2:50 (orientation flight?) and the NASA flight at 6:23 (gotta be just for fun lol; unless they are testing some sort of special height-above-ground-sensors?

I wonder how much "bath" sounds like "bad" to a dog when said in that sort of tone. But yeah, it's sort of funny when dogs do this but I'd much rather assure my buddy that he's being good.

Didn't see any obvious evidence of two technologies but I sort of assume they are there---
1) "Bubblers" under the bow to put air under the ice before the weight of the ship cracks it and pushes it aside (ice with air under it is easier to break)
2) bow design that take the weight of the ship up above and onto the ice to crush from above (complements #1)...

The motion where the sand meets the ground doesn't look right. Doesn't seem like the sort of thing someone would intentionally fake, maybe it's just the video compression, but anyways, it doesn't look right.

Unfortunately they don't have to do better than this. Hundreds of thousands of people believed Justin Trudeau wore fake eyebrows because they couldn't comprehend lighting and shadows. This sort of shit will work because there are tens of millions of Americans with below average intelligence who are either unwilling or incapable of questioning it.

I'm a glass half empty, therefore another round please, sort of person.