people will and are dying, you malicious piece of shit.

https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2025/feb/28/usaid-funding-health-development-hiv-aids-antiretroviral-mothers-lgbt-sex-workers-south-afr
ica

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/27/health/usaid-contract-terminations.html

https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/kenya-hiv-patients-live-fear-us-aid-freeze-strand-drugs-warehouse-2025-03-11/

go look for yourself.

https://doge.gov/

You fail to understand.
The left is blowing gaskets at DOGE cuts.

Damage? What damage?
People loosing jobs that are not needed?
When was the last Gov layoff?

In last 25 years I've gone though at least 4 rounds.
So have many other companies.

Government would use a good layoff cycle.

Ruh-roe.
Nothing from doge who swore they would be 100% transparent, but independent watchdogs supervising it and even doge whistleblowers have uncovered evidence they not only accessed AND COPIED AND REMOVED sensitive private citizen data at multiple agencies in direct contradiction of specific court orders, but also have multiple anonymous actors using Russian IP addresses accessing the data.

They sold it.

*discard

*discard

Even more in its official YouTube playlist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLS_gQd8UB-hL6ysK39pY5Hm77Vl4Qc0Eo

Neat. I approve. Make the machines so stupid they are easily identifiable as sub par or they will replace human creators. Better get to it before it’s too late.

it's not kool-aid, it's math.

the amount of effort you put in to misunderstand the world around is truly impressive.

the criticism of the amount is because that is that standard that DOGE itself has claimed to be important. the criticism is that DOGE is lying and not successful by the the very standards DOGE has defined. the "left" is not pissed that it is an insignificant amount. the "left" is pissed that it has done so much damage, real damage, purely for the optics of having saved so little money, which it hasn't even done.

*promote *quality facts

Economists agree, the at random blanket cuts to cost saving agencies and programs being made at random are not saving any money at all, they are costing money and services while hurting citizens by ending hard negotiated assistance programs, which is the point not saving money.

The under 1% ($115 billion maximum if you believe the constant liars) of the budget cut at random will cost over 10% of gdp, put hundreds of thousands out of work permanently, put millions on the streets homeless with nothing left to lose by robbing people and everything to gain, it has already cost thousands their farms or ranches or businesses, slowed commerce to a crawl, and has already been spent like a drunken sailor 100 times over on unnecessary things like raising the military budget by $120 billion and a now $6 trillion tax break (and rising) for the 1% and a self imposed $7-$11 trillion loss in the stock market just to name 3 of dozens of massive expenditures.

If only these really were savings and not simply wealth transfers from the poor to the uber-rich, states like California (that pays for the welfare that goes to red states) would be 100% in favor of them, we can pay for our own social programs and save the 90% of our tax dollars we pay for yours, but Texas and Florida and the other red welfare states will go bankrupt this year without the tens of billions a year they take from blue states with healthy economies (Texas paid $18 billion in and took $89 billion out from the fed as just one example).
Notice, no rebate checks are coming, your taxes aren’t going down one cent, but all the services and protections they have historically provided are either going or already gone.

keep drinking the Kool Aid.

The question is not that cutting 5 million, 70 million, 5 billion etc, in which DOGE cuts represents approx 2% of the budget.

The question is why is the left so pissed at such a insignificant amount?