Today on 'Abusive Cops'....More Abuse

*News media organizations are free to use this video on air, in print and online. Please credit: Courtesy of Tyree Carroll Family.*

A new video out of Philadelphia shows a young Black man being severely beaten and tased by Philadelphia officers in what can only remind you of Rodney King.

On April 3 at approximately 7:30 p.m. Tyree Carroll, 22, was riding his bike on Locust Avenue in Germantown--near his home where he lives with his grandmother Nancy Carroll. According to family members, Tyree was stopped by a police officer for going the wrong way on a one-way street.

When he was stopped by the police officer, Tyree obeyed and got off of his bike and spoke with the officer. The officer then proceeded to put Tyree’s hands behind his back before four policemen were suddenly on top of him. One police officer put Tyree in a chokehold and wrestled him to the ground.

Officers repeatedly struck him with their fists. They kicked him and hit him with a nightstick.

The cops can be heard yelling “tase the motherfucker” and called Tyree a “piece of shit."

Before long the video shows that there were more cops participating in the beating, tasing, kicking and punching of a screaming Tyree. Tyree was screaming and yelling for his grandmother Nancy to come to the door and can be heard saying that he was sorry.

Witnesses counted 24 white and 2 Black police officers and 11 police cars at the scene. They say Tyree was tased 4 to 5 times before being placed in a police car and taken to Einstein Medical Center. Tyree's medical records have not been obtained by his family yet.

Two neighbors videotaped the vicious beating on their cell phones. One video was too dark to be useful, but the other captured the incident quite graphically and included a narration by the witness.

Tyree was initially charged with aggravated assault, simple assault, recklessly endangering another person, resisting arrest and several drug charges stemming from a small amount of crack cocaine allegedly found on him.

At Tyree's preliminary hearing on June 30 all of the charges were maintained, except for one of the assault charges which was reduced to a second degree felony. His case has been ordered to go to trial. The bail was decreased from $15,000 to $5,000 but Tyree was still ineligible to be released on bail due to a probation violation on a previous case. Tyree's next court appearance will be his arraignment hearing scheduled for July 21. He is currently being represented by a public defender.

I'm told that the arresting officer was John Ellis with the Philadelphia Police Department's narcotics squad. Ellis testified at Tyree's preliminary hearing that the incident began when he allegedly observed a couple of men doing what looked like a drug transaction on the corner of Chew and Chelten in Germantown. Ellis allegedly observed Tyree walking up to and speaking with the men. The officer said he saw no money or goods change hands. Ellis went on to explain when he later saw Tyree on his bike he stopped him saying he was riding his bike the wrong way on a one-way street. Another officer also testified at the preliminary hearing and both cops claim Tyree bit them while trying to get away and claimed they had to go to the hospital and were put on antibiotics. They both admitted to punching and hitting Tyree with billy clubs, but not kicking or tasering him as could be seen in the video. Ellis said he knows Tyree and that "he's a nice guy" and that when Tyree was in the back of the police car on the way to the hospital following the beating Tyree apologized to him saying "I bad, I bad."

The family is currently working with the public defender to try and get Tyree out of jail on bail and the charges against him dropped.

Note they also steal and destroy his bicycle at the end of the video.
Mordhausjokingly says...

Clearly he was fighting and biting the police, so much so that 11 officers needed to be there to hold him down, kick him, punch him, and taze him.

I want that dude on my fantasy football team, because he is obviously black superman.

*promote

siftbotsays...

Promoting this video and sending it back into the queue for one more try; last queued Thursday, July 9th, 2015 10:04am PDT - promote requested by Mordhaus.

Esoogsays...

"When he was stopped by the police officer, Tyree obeyed and got off of his bike and spoke with the officer. The officer then proceeded to put Tyree’s hands behind his back before four policemen were suddenly on top of him."

Really? Where is this part of the video? Why do we never get to see this part?

Fairbssays...

Probably because they didn't think to start video taping until things got ugly. Are you a police apologist?

Esoogsaid:

"When he was stopped by the police officer, Tyree obeyed and got off of his bike and spoke with the officer. The officer then proceeded to put Tyree’s hands behind his back before four policemen were suddenly on top of him."

Really? Where is this part of the video? Why do we never get to see this part?

Lawdeedawsays...

No, he raises a point that always should be taken into account. Not that the point is always valid mind you, nor am I saying it is valid here. But to jump on the "police apologist" bandwagon like the billion others for someone simply making that statement shows your bias.

If a description of the video is in the video description then it must be proven to be true, as a description of the content that is patently false (by omission or otherwise) is unacceptable on the Sift. Can't tag this with "cancer" can we? I mean T might have cancer, but nothing indicates such by the video.

If nothing, a link suffices that proves such, whether through eyewitnesses or such. Trust me, I tried to be funny once with the description...description denied...tried to be funny with tag...tag denied...

Fairbssaid:

Probably because they didn't think to start video taping until things got ugly. Are you a police apologist?

KrazyKat42says...

I know several bar bouncers (not trained police officers) who have told me that any 5 trained men can restrain any one man, no matter what.

They should have just cuffed him and thrown him into a squad car.

End of story.

lucky760says...

I don't know. Seems to me he kept resisting.

Initially the cops weren't just attacking him while he laid on the ground. They were obviously trying to get him to lay on the ground and kept yelling at him to put his hands behind his back and he wasn't complying.

Obviously the number of cops in action may be excessive, but this doesn't look like a typical (nowadays) free-for-all where they're just going to town on a guy because they're excited.

ulysses1904says...

Several bar bouncers told you that? That's good enough for me too, especially with the marked restraint you see in all bar bouncer videos.

KrazyKat42said:

I know several bar bouncers (not trained police officers) who have told me that any 5 trained men can restrain any one man, no matter what.

They should have just cuffed him and thrown him into a squad car.

End of story.

Lawdeedawsays...

You ever see the Billy Madison part about the ethics dog...and how we are dumber just by listening to the story? Yeah, we are dumber for reading your stuff.

I have had plenty of rapist friends tell me they can hold down a victim single handily...

KrazyKat42said:

I know several bar bouncers (not trained police officers) who have told me that any 5 trained men can restrain any one man, no matter what.

They should have just cuffed him and thrown him into a squad car.

End of story.

Fairbssays...

I agree with you that the video doesn't tell the entire story. I do have a low opinion of some police and have questions about the value and purpose of the police in general. I'll admit it does really aggravate me when I see videos like this. I also do believe that most cops are trying to do a good job.

As far as the police apologist part of my comment, I was asking a question. It was pointed, but there are at least a few people that I would call police apologists on the sift (and some on the other end of the spectrum). I was curious if I could actually get a thoughtful answer from the original commenter.

Lawdeedawsaid:

No, he raises a point that always should be taken into account. Not that the point is always valid mind you, nor am I saying it is valid here. But to jump on the "police apologist" bandwagon like the billion others for someone simply making that statement shows your bias.

If a description of the video is in the video description then it must be proven to be true, as a description of the content that is patently false (by omission or otherwise) is unacceptable on the Sift. Can't tag this with "cancer" can we? I mean T might have cancer, but nothing indicates such by the video.

If nothing, a link suffices that proves such, whether through eyewitnesses or such. Trust me, I tried to be funny once with the description...description denied...tried to be funny with tag...tag denied...

Send this Article to a Friend



Separate multiple emails with a comma (,); limit 5 recipients






Your email has been sent successfully!

Manage this Video in Your Playlists




notify when someone comments
X

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
  
Learn More