Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
38 Comments
Grimmsays...*promote
siftbotsays...Self promoting this video and sending it back into the queue for one more try; last queued Tuesday, August 16th, 2011 4:11am PDT - promote requested by original submitter Grimm.
RedSkysays...*blocked
Using Hotspot Shield is such an unnecessary hassle.
siftbotsays...This video has been flagged as having an embed that is Region Blocked to not function in certain geographical locations - declared blocked by RedSky.
thatavguysays...To Unblock this - use firefox, install the add-on Modify headers
Add X-Forwarded-For 12.13.14.15
then enable it and leave open
Open browser again and load this page and it'll work.
Enzobluesays...Same thing last election. Paul beat McCain in Arizona, but so narrowly that CNN felt it ok to put them alphabetically in order on their website - Time mentioned him like once during the entire Primary cycle. Just bizarre how openly they're dismissing him. It's like openly admitting their corruption.
garmachisays...Ron Paul is dangerous. But in a good way.
Grimmsays...The media plays a big roll in who the average Joe pays attention to. Most people just don't want to bother at this point when there are so many people in the running so they take a wait and see approach. Whoever is still around and getting the most news coverage is usually who they get behind.
Back in 2007 Ron Paul raised $4.2 million in 24 hours without the help of the media. Before Obama had been ordained by the media as the front runner his supporters tried to duplicate what Ron Paul accomplished. They raised $4,650 from 72 people.
DrewNumberTwosays...RAGE.
GeeSussFreeKsays...People that stand for something aren't allowed in mainstream politics.
Fantomassays...Busey for President!
waynef100says...excellent
mrsidsays...*quality
siftbotsays...Boosting this quality contribution up in the Hot Listing - declared quality by mrsid.
NetRunnersays...*news
siftbotsays...Adding video to channels (News) - requested by NetRunner.
Yogisays...>> ^garmachi:
Ron Paul is dangerous. But in a good way.
This is what I like about him...he has some great policies that the american people respond SOO well two on both sides of the aisle. I'm tempted to vote for him JUST BECAUSE he's against our Wars, even though I know if he gets elected the Insurance rates skyrocket and Capitalism crushes us completely.
blankfistsays...@dystopianfuturetoday, are these news outlets also part of the big corporations you claim "inform my politics"? Looks like the corporations don't much care for Libertarianism even when mixed with a folksy dose of Conservatism. They do love them some status quo like Romney, Bachmann and, oh yeah, even Obama gets his day in the sun.
In case you're foggy what I mean, let me cite that for you.
Truckchasesays...Current Republican party policies:
1>No funding for any social programs other than those that get us elected
2>What goes on in your bedroom is our business
and most importantly
3>Bomb brown people
If you don't agree with all three you must be a looney eh?
marblessays...Corporate Media Admit They Censor Candidates Who Challenge the Status Quo:
Preface: Liberals shouldn't ignore the media's censoring of Ron Paul's popularity in straw polls because he's "on the right". Many progressive candidates have been shut out of political races by the big corporate media.
Reuters Edits Iowa Poll Reality According to Globalist Agenda:
Often cited as a reliable, reputable news source, Reuters is in actuality nothing more than another den of duplicity bought and paid for by the corporate financiers ruling/ruining Western civilization. Their latest article titled, "Bachmann and Perry - a beautiful 2012 rivalry" sidelines reality according to the globalist script so soundly you can almost hear the noses of Reuters editors' growing. The GOP Iowa debate saw Ron Paul annihilate the competition with counts showing him as far as three times further ahead of the next runner-up Newt Gingrich. However, the final tally of the Iowa straw poll saw establishment footstool Michele Bachmann eke out Ron Paul by a mere 152 votes. Despite the closeness of the race and the immense political ramifications of a candidate labeled by the corporate media as part of "fringe politics" finishing neck-to-neck with the insincere Bachmann, Reuters decided to write about Rick Perry's insignificant, meaningless, though establishment approved, entry into the GOP 2012 race instead. Not a single mention of Ron Paul was made.
Lawdeedawsays...Sorry, blankfist's *isadupe of yours... @blankfisthttp://videosift.com/video/TDS-Indecision-2012-Ron-Paul-the-Top-Tier
blankfistsays...>> ^Lawdeedaw:
Sorry, isadupe of blankfist... @blankfisthttp://videosift.com/video/TDS-Indecision-2012-Ron-Paul-the-Top-Tier
Actually mine is the dupe, not this one. I was waiting for lucky or dag to respond to my Sift Talk post, but feel free to dupe mine at any time.
Lawdeedawjokingly says...>> ^blankfist:
>> ^Lawdeedaw:
Sorry, isadupe of blankfist... @blankfisthttp://videosift.com/video/TDS-Indecision-2012-Ron-Paul-the-Top-Tier
Actually mine is the dupe, not this one. I was waiting for lucky or dag to respond to my Sift Talk post, but feel free to dupe mine at any time.
Can't until gold star...Anyways, I am dumb yet again... thanks...for pointing it out. Dear god is my attention span that of a gnat? But at least there is editing...haha, what do you mean blankfist? See my original edited comment that is meant to make you look silly?
siftbotsays...14 more comments have been lost in the ether at this killed duplicate.
Maurusays...The problem with Ron Paul running as a presidential candidate would be that his ideologies are so radically different (not all good mind you) from the current political perspective in the US it would take a very well educated public to win the "undecided" voter.
i.e.: voters who actually vote on ideologies, campaign goals and what we would generally call reason instead of partisanship and cultural background.
The Republicans and mainstream media are well aware of that fact and while they secretly like RP to run as senator or basically any other position (even though they can't openly admit it) because he breaks traditional voting habits they would never boost him as a presidential candidate.
Sad but true. That's why there's all the smirking when he speaks. It's not because they fundamentally oppose his principles but because they believe that the level of debate R.P. as a candidate would require to succeed is unachievable (or perhaps undesirable) at America's cultural level
kymbossays...Why use Hulu, when you could use Comedy Central embed?
bamdrewsays...Who will watch the watchmen?
Apparently a comedian on a cable show that parodies other news shows.
... seems so obvious in retrospect.
Grimmsays...Hulu? What choo talkin bout Willis?>> ^kymbos:
Why use Hulu, when you could use Comedy Central embed?
siftbotsays...Tags for this video have been changed from 'jon stewart, ron paul, tds, news media, corn polled' to 'jon stewart, ron paul, tds, news media, corn polled, 13th floor' - edited by ponceleon
Lawdeedawsays...>> ^Yogi:
>> ^garmachi:
Ron Paul is dangerous. But in a good way.
This is what I like about him...he has some great policies that the american people respond SOO well two on both sides of the aisle. I'm tempted to vote for him JUST BECAUSE he's against our Wars, even though I know if he gets elected the Insurance rates skyrocket and Capitalism crushes us completely.
Do it, and regret it later
Lawdeedawsays...You call it the "problem" but isn't it the solution?
>> ^Mauru:
The problem with Ron Paul running as a presidential candidate would be that his ideologies are so radically different (not all good mind you) from the current political perspective in the US it would take a very well educated public to win the "undecided" voter.
i.e.: voters who actually vote on ideologies, campaign goals and what we would generally call reason instead of partisanship and cultural background.
The Republicans and mainstream media are well aware of that fact and while they secretly like RP to run as senator or basically any other position (even though they can't openly admit it) because he breaks traditional voting habits they would never boost him as a presidential candidate.
Sad but true. That's why there's all the smirking when he speaks. It's not because they fundamentally oppose his principles but because they believe that the level of debate R.P. as a candidate would require to succeed is unachievable (or perhaps undesirable) at America's cultural level
Paybacksays...>> ^garmachi:
Ron Paul is dangerous. But in a good way.
That's not danger, that's true Conservatism.
Drachen_Jagersays...Who cares about Ron Paul? He's just another crazy in a race full of them. His views make as much sense as Bachman's or Perry's, he's just more articulate and less of a 'mainstream' Republican.
steroidgsays...*gets excited about watching the current No 1 ranking sift*
*clicks on the big arrow to play*
"Sorry, this video is unavailable form your location"
...
*puts mouse down calmly, closes eyes and takes a deep breath*
.........
FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU......
dagsays...Comment hidden because you are ignoring dag.(show it anyway)
*findthumb
siftbotsays...The thumbnail image for this video has been updated - findthumb requested by dag.
siftbotsays...The thumbnail image for this video has been updated - thumbnail added by Boise_Lib.
siftbotsays...The thumbnail image for this video has been updated - thumbnail added by eric3579.
Discuss...
Enable JavaScript to submit a comment.