Who would think that Anonymous and I agree about ones right to own guns.

*controversy

Adding video to channels (Controversy) - requested by MrFisk.

Invoking Godwin's Law @ 1:40, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin's_law

Thanks for posting this

Excellent video. My exact feelings about guns, media, knee-jerk gin control talks and police abuses.

Comment hidden because you are ignoring dag.(show it anyway)

Sounds more like Tea Party than say, Occupy Wall Street. I'm a little surprised and can't believe this is a uniform or even majority Anonymous POV.

ConTROVosy...love how you Brits say it-

I never had Anonymous pegged as pro gun.

On one hand I think this is either fake or unsupported by the many more-active sub-sects forming Anonymous.

On the other hand, I'd like to see the gun control continue if not to create the results seen within Australia, than to see what would actually happen due to the loads of legal pressure based statements in this video which lack any definitive consequential statements.. from memory, all the video's I've seen of Anonymous taking a stand, they've mentioned Anonymous driven consequential action.. which leads me back to my initial hand.

Hmm, something smells about this; it just doesn't ring as true 'Anonymous'

Pro-Constitution, pro-second and fourth amendment, pro-sanity, sir.

I considered them Pro-intelligence first. I don't understand why people hold up the constitution as something we should follow to the later, it allowed for Slavery. The second amendment is selectively followed. Also what sanity? What about owning guns is more sane than not?

No it doesn't...also what is anonymous? Is it a 10 person panel? Did they vote on the content or wording of this announcement? Do they meet somewhere to discuss these issues at length?

You can be a quality hacker and even a very smart person that is misguided and miseducated. Obama is a very intelligent person, he still makes decisions that are stupid or just wrong.

"Two potentially mortal situations were diffused this week in Houston, Texas by responsible citizens with concealed carry endorsements."

Ok I will accept this as soon as you compare this data to the data you find of accidental shootings. It's a numbers game, and you're wrong. More harm than good.

Is it so wrong?? To let the herd cull itself ?? Johnny can't use his hammer correctly so he beat himself in the face and needs stiches. Ban Hammers.
Billy slipped on dish soap in his kitchen wearing defective non-slip soles, ban those, we're too fucking stupid to walk around in our own ki9tchen.
Little Timmy threw a rock and it entered the man's brain through his temple. BAN ROCKS.

This argument is as sound as any that have spewed from all on this subject with a fear of the unknown and a severe lack of basic motor skills and critical thinking-

It is wrong to rely on what is reported and what is not reported by news media, local blotters, etc. to shape one's understanding of the constitution and the history of the United States. YOU PEOPLE WATCH TOO MUCH FUCKING TELEVISION (in whatever country you're in) AND KNWO DICK ABOUT RECENT HISTORY, MUCH LESS ANCIENT.!! The fact that this shit is even up for vote, retooling, or added restrictions boggles, man. Short of a constitutional amendment, the shit reads clearly and plainly in the 2nd and 4rth-If you amend the 2nd you have fucked the thing up, which will consequently, screw the 4rth.

More laws for idiots and imbeciles, less for the operations managers of a realistic unfolding of our immediate future.

A fastidious child with an hour of training and two of practice could kill 100 people with a .22 pistol before the police come or someone wrestles her to the ground, be it school, mall, fast-food joint or post-office line.

Fuck, give morons a goddamn tattoo so we know who to keep sharpened toothbrushes away from

Anyone waxing idyllic about a world where you wake up tomorrow with new LAWS designed to keep whack-jobs, dumb-asses, or remorseless criminals whose M-O involves creating terror away from guns, fast-forward to about the 9:00 mark and open up your fucking ears maybe??!

The answer may be found after a, "head-extracted-from-your-own-lack-of-knowledge", realization.

yo, for those who are all like "doesn't sound like real anonymous"...who the fuck are the real anonymous? The people you agree with? I was under the impression that anonymous wasn't a clearly defined group - pretty much anybody can call themselves anonymous, the point isn't from whence the message comes but the message itself rite.

Every time I read a news story that starts "Anonymous hacks x" or "Anonymous announces y" I read it as "Some people did Z".

Anonymous is quite literally....anyone.

Why should we listen to just....anyone.

Just like....anyone else, there are things we will agree with and there will be things we disagree with. Anything else is mindless obedience. Kinda like the mindless obedience the right has to the NRA, Grover Norquist, Rush Limbauh. and Fox.

No one elected these assholes, yet for some reason, they have more influence over our government than it's own voters.

Meet someone who does not identify with right, left, or any other meaningless dipole...whose opinion is shaped by an inner dialogue and multi-sensory experiential reasoning tinctured with freedom of movement and expression, in an ever-changing constant of evolution:
"NRA, Grover Norquist, Rush Limbauh. and Fox" are constructs of something you believe according to your particular developmental disability which have some sort of effect on the OTHER star-bellied sneetches with more (OB-viouslaaay!) going on upstairs, be it through mo edumacation or proximity or distance from some geographical region of the country over another.

How many more ways can you say fucked, when the distillation of all these incidents as we continue the experiment becomes only:
Police
Soldiers
Private Security
Prison Guards.....who are allowed to carry weapons?

Fuck that world, until guns are not part of the paradigm, fuck that fucking world and those who would that it be that world conveniently for themselves, today...for instance, anyone trying to pass legislation that seeks to limit rights and create laws telling people what they can't do, rather than increase personal responsibility through shaping a society and culture worth saving.

Yeah that's the stupidest argument I've ever heard. I can kill someone with a knife and with my hands but I have to make a concerted effort to do so. It's a bunch of individual decisions. A Gun takes a single decision and many times in this country not even a decision to kill someone. I talk a lot about not giving the government the permission to do certain things. What about making sure that individuals aren't given the right to have such immediate control of my life? I have to walk into a store with someone who is open carry, who at anytime can decide my life is forfeit?

Every argument I've heard from Gun Supporters doesn't hold up, yet they say "LOGIC!" No it's not enough to be logical, if you think it is you're just dumb. Also DUMB logic doesn't work at all. Gun supporters aren't stupid, they just like guns, and they'll make lazy arguments unless they're stood up to and required to fucking think.

No ones thinking, everyones just moving along.

This is way too stupid to be anonymous.

*dead

This video has been declared non-functional; embed code must be fixed within 2 days or it will be sent to the dead pool - declared dead by chicchorea.