Funny video, but is it going to pass the dag wood test?

Not sure, I just thought it was funny.
>> ^Stingray:

Funny video, but is it going to pass the dag wood test?

I know it's intended as comedy, but I think that enough of its content qualifies as porn to make it both. For those of you not planning to watch, I'm referring to graphic fellatio.

Does it belong on the sift? *discuss

This video is being sent to Sift Talk for discussion - discuss requested by garmachi.

If I put forward gwiz to be banned do I get me a ban badge???

>> ^Hybrid:

If I put forward gwiz to be banned do I get me a ban badge???


That will take you straight to a level 3 Ban Police badge.

@garmachi Obviously I think it does. I don't expect it to make it though, but it was worth a shot.

@lucky760 @Hybrid *shakes fists*

*ban

gwiz665 cannot be banned because star accounts are immune to banination - ignoring ban request by blankfist.

>> ^Hybrid:

If I put forward gwiz to be banned do I get me a ban badge???


why ban gwiz, just send him to Sweden

That was funny !

http://videosift.com/video/50-seconds-of-hot-lesbian-action-from-the-movie-Chloe that's damn near as bad as the above one.

Finally watched it. Pretty damn funny. *ban.

gwiz665 cannot be banned because star accounts are immune to banination - ignoring ban request by blankfist.

>> ^gwiz665:

http://videosift.com/video/50-seconds-of-hot-lesbian-action-fr
om-the-movie-Chloe that's damn near as bad as the above one.


Yeah, that probably shouldn't be on the sift too.

I'm not trying to be a prude, but there's been a couple of times I see a video I'd love to put on the sift but don't because I was under the impression that VS didn't allow sex scenes.

#7 is the FAQ states:
VideoSift does not allow videos containing explicit sexual content. If such a video is submitted, it will be promptly removed and the submitter may be subject to a temporary or permanent ban.

"Explicit sexual content" is defined on VideoSift as gratuitous nudity of a sexual nature lacking any reasonable artistic and educational merit, implying its sole intent is to cause sexual arousal.

This video is very gray area because it is supposed to be a comedy type skit, but shows a girl sucking off a guy. Didn't really arouse me, but that's probably because of the simulated puking at the same time too.

*arouse

I'm not sure why this is being discussed - while funny, she's sucking dick. That is porn.
I vote for a * discard.

And let's *ban gwiz while we're at it - that guy's worse than looking in your pants to discover something akin to opening a PBJ.

gwiz665 cannot be banned because star accounts are immune to banination - ignoring ban request by SlipperyPete.

If the goofy kung fu sex video wasn't ok, then this certainly isn't.

@xxovercast I went looking for it and boy is it hilarious.

Come on Gwiz, you KNOW this sort of stuff Absolutely does not belong here. I'm going to be a dick and *discard this because it just doesn't belong here.

Only the original submitter of a post discard it unless the submitter is banned - ignoring discard request by spoco2.

Fine sifty, stop me being able to, but you know you want to, you know you want to so bad

@spoco2 Stop in the name of american squeamishness. This skates the edges, certainly, I expected that the explicit blowjob part would be its doom, but I think this is siftable. If there wasn't an executive order not to sift porn and if people weren't so overly diligent in interpreting that, it would have sifted fine too.

Seriously @gwiz665, you know why the rule is in place.

Without it, Videosift would just turn into Porn-Bumper, there would be non-stop porn getting sifted.

We'd have to make all new channels ffs.

Dick-in-the-mouth (/w vomit no less) porn doesn't belong here.

@KnivesOut the rule is in place for the same reason as the snuff rule, to keep the straight up porn out. If there are redeeming qualities, like certain violent videos, it should be allowed.

Disagree. That clip is not nearly as graphic and has 10x the production value. There is no "pussy in mouth" because you don't see any of the bits. There aren't even nipples (to my disappointment.)

So would a snuff film be allowable if it had a happy ending? Or if there was some comedy in the process of murdering the hobo? No, it's disqualified by the presence of this objectionable content, not qualified by the presence of something redeeming.
>> ^gwiz665:

...
Does that belong? Pussy in mouth isn't much "better".

> ^gwiz665:

@<a rel="nofollow" href="http://videosift.com/member/spoco2" title="member since August 21st, 2006" class="profilelink">spoco2 Stop in the name of american squeamishness. This skates the edges, certainly, I expected that the explicit blowjob part would be its doom, but I think this is siftable. If there wasn't an executive order not to sift porn and if people weren't so overly diligent in interpreting that, it would have sifted fine too.


Don't even try to make this be about people being 'prudes'. There are places for that sort of thing, and the sift is NOT one of them, it's not us being prudish about the content, it's about us not wanting it on THIS SITE. One of the things about this place is that it's pretty much work safe, even the NSFW stuff is fine for most workplaces. THAT was nowhere NEAR being safe for any work place, and it is, whether you like it or not, hard core porn. As soon as there is a dick in a mouth or other orifice it is porn.

We all know you like your porn gwiz, and that's fine, hell, I have no issue with it myself, but get your porn fix elsewhere and keep it away from here. Why must you keep trying to bring it here? *sigh* Are you on some crusade to make the sift a pornocopia? Just leave it be.

@spoco2 Settle down. The sift is not work-safe on a whole, and we do have the NSFW invocation. I don't get my porn fix from videosift, because it is not a porn site, and I DON'T WANT IT TO BE, but I think there is merit it this video. As I've thought there was merit in every other video I've submitted, whether there is explicit material in it or not.

There are plenty, plenty of porn videos that have no merit here, like porn with the primary function of being porn - but a video like the one above, is comedy first and explicit second. I think that gives it value enough to be part of the sift.

So yes, this has everything to do with being a prude.

When I find a video I think has merit I will submit it, whether or not there is explicit material in it. I'll even acquiesce that I'm very careful when doing so because I don't want anyone slippery sloping the site into a porn site.

This video is fine. The kung-fu porn one is fine. The NSFW is there, so don't watch it at work. Videos using these scenarios have no merit here.

>> ^KnivesOut:
Without it, Videosift would just turn into Porn-Bumper, there would be non-stop porn getting sifted.


If the sift were like pornbumper no one would have posted a video in six months (wtf guys?)

I thought the no porn rule was more about appeasing the advertisers, in which case any redeeming features may not signify.

@gwiz665 While I appreciate you trying to find the boundaries of what is or is not Siftable, the rule doesn't state porn is not allowed; it states "explicit sexual content" is not allowed and I think this falls into that category, even if it may have other Siftable qualities. Sorry mate. If it's any consolation I'm not gonna ask you to be banned for it!

Personally, I don't really give a shit if this stays or not, but I can't see how it should. There's no way the advertisers will be ok with it, so any argument about alleged "redeeming" qualities is pointless.

Your examples of other videos that are 'just as bad' don't fly as neither of them actually shows anything beyond kissing. Sexual activity is implied, but not shown.

Ultimately, none of our opinions matter if it violates the advertising agreement. Based on what @dag has said about it in the past, I can't imagine this doesn't.

""Explicit sexual content" is defined on VideoSift as gratuitous nudity of a sexual nature lacking any reasonable artistic and educational merit, implying its sole intent is to cause sexual arousal."
http://videosift.com/faq-en.php#faq

Comment hidden because you are ignoring dag.(show it anyway)

This is explicit sexual content and has to go. Gwiz, if you're hellbent on posting porn, there are many places to do it- please stop fucking up my Christmas holiday and the Sift. KthanksBye. *discard

Discarding this post - discard requested by member dag.

Bah humbug, motherfuckers.