How Various Presidents Treat(ed) Secret Service Agents

enochsays...

pol pot was reportedly the sweetest to his dogs.
he treated them like family.
i know this because my friends mothers cousins ex-boyfriends uncle knows a guy who sat next to pol pots valet on a plane.
so it must be true.


fuck me in the face with a chainsaw this was stupid.
this man is most certainly *eia

Yogisays...

>> ^Boise_Lib:

W was teh most intelligent...lost me there buddy.


W is probably quite an intelligent person...doesn't mean he can't be marginalized or led to believe stupid things. Or the fact that he's the president means very little in this country.

quantumushroomsays...

If it was some dirtbag dishing about Palin you'd be on your knees like it was the fucking gospel.



>> ^enoch:

pol pot was reportedly the sweetest to his dogs.
he treated them like family.
i know this because my friends mothers cousins ex-boyfriends uncle knows a guy who sat next to pol pots valet on a plane.
so it must be true.

fuck me in the face with a chainsaw this was stupid.
this man is most certainly eia

enochsays...

>> ^quantumushroom:

If it was some dirtbag dishing about Palin you'd be on your knees like it was the fucking gospel.

>> ^enoch:
pol pot was reportedly the sweetest to his dogs.
he treated them like family.
i know this because my friends mothers cousins ex-boyfriends uncle knows a guy who sat next to pol pots valet on a plane.
so it must be true.

fuck me in the face with a chainsaw this was stupid.
this man is most certainly eia



you tryin to troll me sexy thang?
well aint you just the cutest!
but i think you may have me confused with someone else.

my analogy is correct and you know it.
but this man has a right to say his piece and if you wish to use his second hand hearsay as a validation for your opinion,well then go right ahead but dont cry when someone tears your entire premise apart.
why?
because its hearsay(am i spelling that right?) and innuendo..
thats why.

geez QM dont take it so personal.i was commenting on the video not attacking you for christ sakes.
why you getting all defensive-like?
this your brother in law or something?

quantumushroomsays...

you tryin to troll me sexy thang?

Considering it's my submitted sift, I'd say it's the opposite, except I don't accuse anyone of trolling.

well aint you just the cutest!
but i think you may have me confused with someone else.


That would assume I know who you are to begin with.

my analogy is correct and you know it.
but this man has a right to say his piece and if you wish to use his second hand hearsay as a validation for your opinion,well then go right ahead but dont cry when someone tears your entire premise apart.


At no point did I say this guy's 'hearsay' (you spelled it correctly) was 100% Truth. HOWEVER this is not the first time or source I've heard/read that this is what the Secret Service agents thought of their bosses and they seem to match up. And I think on some level YOU know this guy's hitting it close to the mark. I can't imagine an imperious Hillary ever giving a shit about the 'hired help' and I can see Bubba stockpiling Twinkies in the Oval Office desk.

geez QM dont take it so personal.i was commenting on the video not attacking you for christ sakes.
why you getting all defensive-like?
this your brother in law or something?


Anyone who wants to get to something approaching the truth has to wade through liberal lies (and hearsay) all day long. Remember Bush saying of the Constitution, "It's just a goddamned piece of paper!" Except he didn't.

It's not like both sides don't enjoy a good "rumor", but EVERY election cycle do we have to hear from taxocrats about how evil Republicans are planning on "scrapping" Social Security and putting the elderly in camps?

blackorebsays...

The gentleman in the video appears to be parroting a debunked chain email. By "parroting", I mean the dude is repeating an anonymous email and pretending he heard the information first hand. And by "debunked", I mean the email claims to list highlights from a real book ("In The President's Secret Service: Behind the Scenes with Agents in the Line of Fire and the Presidents They Protect" by Ronald Kessler), but the contents of the book do not match the contents of the email.

More Info:
http://www.factcheck.org/2011/06/secret-service-tattletales/

HaricotVertsays...

More info at Snopes.com - http://www.snopes.com/politics/clintons/secretservice.asp

Conclusion: completely unverified and unverifiable given the 'anonymous' nature of its alleged "source." Downvote.

>> ^blackoreb:

The gentleman in the video appears to be parroting a debunked chain email. By "parroting", I mean the dude is repeating an anonymous email and pretending he heard the information first hand. And by "debunked", I mean the email claims to list highlights from a real book ("In The President's Secret Service: Behind the Scenes with Agents in the Line of Fire and the Presidents They Protect" by Ronald Kessler), but the contents of the book do not match the contents of the email.
More Info:
http://www.factcheck.org/2011/06/secret-service-tattletales/

Send this Article to a Friend



Separate multiple emails with a comma (,); limit 5 recipients






Your email has been sent successfully!

Manage this Video in Your Playlists




notify when someone comments
X

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
  
Learn More