Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
8 Comments
vil20 second video re-cut to 6:20
The actual video is 2:31 to 2:51 with, granted, one or two nice photographs later on.
spawnflaggerHe was getting his money's worth from his "stock video/photo" subscription!
20 second video re-cut to 6:20
The actual video is 2:31 to 2:51 with, granted, one or two nice photographs later on.
moonsammyDid putting up signs not occur to him? Seems straight-forward to me...
jmdsays...My first comment was also " damn, this is mostly stock footage".
Fairbssays...he should charge 1$ to park there
would make a lot of money
Mystic95Zsays...Get off my lawn!!!
lucky760Funny, we share a lot of the same thoughts.
Yes, 20-second mildly interesting story dramatized and exploded out into an epic stock-footage filled campaign about the world turning on inconsiderate parkers.
"He considered lots of solutions and became desperate..." - not desperate enough to put up a sign?
And what's with the BS footage of rows and rows and rows and rows of cars which they made to seem like was happening on his land? When the showed his actual land there was just room enough for those two short rows of cars.
* lies
dedstickWhen I hear the easily recognizable voice of the narator on this video I immediately turn it off. It seems every site that uses this narator has the same M.O. Lots of non relevant or misleading stock photos and endlessly bloated verbiage. I guess they are trying to match the YouTube algorithm for optimal video length? I find it quite annoying.
20 second video re-cut to 6:20
The actual video is 2:31 to 2:51 with, granted, one or two nice photographs later on.
Discuss...
Enable JavaScript to submit a comment.