Hehe, the only reason this is not porn is that it's *vintage... and we see more hardcore stuff on news-stands.

Adding video to channels (Vintage) - requested by gwiz665.

Wow, that one chick's got some massive and strong boobies

Comment hidden because you are ignoring dag.(show it anyway)

I can't even tell you hot this makes me. For that reason, *discuss. I think this is porn. Anyone else?

This video is being sent to Sift Talk for discussion - discuss requested by dag.

there are literally dozens of videos on the sift that are there for no other reason, really, than LOOK AT THESE TITS! this one actually happens to be hilarious.
just because this particular one gets your rocks off doesn't mean any number of videos didn't get someone elses rocks off.

if this isn't allowed, then my #1 video shouldn't be allowed, and dozens more.
i'm way more offended by the borderline snuff we allow than the hilarious body parts.

i fear the day when the whims of dags cock tell us what is and is not siftable.

I don't think this should be discarded as porn, but it's certainly close to.

This is a perfect benchmark. This can be the limit with which anything more can be considered porn or with which any less could be considered not porn.

Play your cards wisely.

This is softcore porn and absolutely does not belong on the Sift. I feel so strongly about it I'd be happy to temp ban brain for posting it.

It's ridiculous to even consider this as acceptable Sift content.

Why have voting then? Everything will either have 1 or 0 votes from now on.

1 vote = sifted.

0 votes = DELETED.

kitten natividad.
the woman with the muscular breasts is a 70's porn star.
i'm just sayin.......
how do i know that?
uh.../shuffles feet....
got lucky and guessed?
have an implant that has all film stars logged?
a friendly sprite told me?
.....ah poop......

A big problem lies in Sift's Terms and Conditions, specifically the Posting Guidelines. While the T&C's tease of having Pornography as a defined term, the term is in fact is not defined. Only the loose description "adult content" in the Q&A is provided. Without further clarification, we end up with fuzzy guidelines which are as appealing as fuzzy meat. What a crime it would be to ban a member for testing (or tasting) the fuzzy meat.

Parody.

there's nothing wrong with this video. I even let my kids see this - before I wiped them off the screen with a paper towel ...

this video is parody. its not intended that anyone jerk off to the parody of this hilarious 80's videocasette.

dozens of videos featuring breasts, or sexy ladies, have sifted because the male sift sexualized the content.

this talk of bannation is absolutely ridiculous, and im extremely tempted to go around *discussing every video that ever got upvoted because it featured bare chests.

Not porn. Skinemax from the early '80's, but not porn.

Now, that being said, is it Sift-worthy? Not particularly, imho. I don't see anything of value in it, other than it being a timestamp of early '80's soft core. If it were being presented as such, then it might have a place. But it's not, so it doesn't. This is more PornBumper material, even though not technically porn from my standpoint.

Yup, You're right... NOT Porn! But it is Softcore and as such doesn't belong here.
Yes we have fully clothed Bewb videos that we up-vote but all in fun.
This does step over the line. It doesn't offend me, but that's not what is being asked here.
Is this suitable as the type of videos we want here - I say no thanks.
If you want to see this stuff, go to liveleak. Allowing it opens the door for all kinds of other stuff.

I say toss the video, keep the discussion for future reference and move forward. Brian doesn't need to be banned, a warning will do. Lets get back to sifting...

Some people here claim the problem is there is no clear definition of 'porn' and after having concluded this isn't just resort to saying it is nevertheless 'not sift-worthy' or that it does 'not belong here'.

And yet, whenever someone claims a Family Guy or some equally stupid vid does not belong here or isn't funny, the same people claim the community decides what is sift-worthy by voting.

HA HA, CHARADE YOU ARE

^@rasch187: Not trying to be hypocritical by stating my views (also don't know if you were addressing me in particular, but in case you were...). Ultimately I believe in the Sift and its use of voting, so this clip will stay if the community deems it so. I just don't see anything of value in it. It can stay or go, makes no difference to me. That's the beauty of having an "off" switch. I don't have to watch it/listen to it/etc. Now if we could just get Conservatives to understand that point, there would be no need for the FCC.

Oh, and Family Guy has always sucked. South Park got that part right.

Tags for this video have been changed from 'Everything is Terrible, erotic, exercise' to 'Everything is brainless and dickless, erotic, exercise' - edited by choggie

This is excruciatingly terrible, and has no redeeming qualities whatsoever. Not porn, though. I say keep it but ban Brain anyhow, just because.

Well that's resolved then. Good thing we brought this to discussion.

Tags for this video have been changed from 'Everything is brainless and dickless, erotic, exercise' to 'Everything is terrible, erotic, exercise, not your playground' - edited by gwiz665

seeing as the comments stopped coming a long time ago, I'm gonna say *return

and if you say otherwise you're a goddamn stuck-up commie prude. (just making sure no americans discuss this totally unharmful and funny, yet disturbing, vid)

Returning this video from Sift Talk - return requested by rasch187.

Moving this video to brain's personal queue. It failed to receive enough votes to get sifted up to the front page within 2 days.

*promote

Self promoting this video and sending it back into the queue for one more try; last queued - promote requested by original submitter brain.

Tags for this video have been changed from 'Everything is terrible, erotic, exercise, not your playground' to 'Everything is terrible, erotic, exercise' - edited by choggie

*kill

Not porn, porn, not porn, porn, How about timing??...Ever take that into account, y'know, decide whether or not a joke is funny anymore, and decide to, for the sake of one's own dignity to keep the crowd coming back for more rather than give their friends an honest account of how tired the act was. Battin' a thousand there guys....seems to me you folks are sullied on the whole place.....Sound familiar??