I'd also hope that the parents would be exposed and shamed by the investigation. They deserve a good portion of the blame for their children's behavior.

Couldn't agree more Knives...I can't even imagine my parents reaction if they'd seen me treating anyone that way, but especially someone elderly.

You're an adult and they're stupid kids.

Don't sit there and cry about it. You could ruin their shit 10x worse just by telling their parents.

This is another example of why Liberalism is totally wrong and destructive to society.

LOL when I saw that you were watching the video, I kept reloading the page to see what sort of ridiculous bullshit you would vomit out in the form of a comment.

I was not disappointed.

Actually, I blame conservatives for this, and I have just as little reason or justification as you do.>> ^bobknight33:

This is another example of why Liberalism is totally wrong and destructive to society.

Forgot every argument I know anti-hitting kids within 30 seconds...

>> ^bobknight33:

This is another example of why Liberalism is totally wrong and destructive to society.


bobknight33, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.

Kids aren't mature enough to wholeheartedly welcome people who is different from them. They have nothing common with this lady other than the fact that she's riding a bus with them, which casts her as an outsider.

I'm also guessing the school spent very little money educating kids on bullying, nor did they spend the money to properly train this poor woman from such abuse. It's not that kids are terrible, it's the horrible lack of support these people got from their school.

Both the kids and the school monitor should have been trained on these kinds of issues, but responsibility mostly falls on the adult. Kids are brutal. Their prefrontal cortex isn't developed well enough to monitor their own social behaviors and impulses. They literally cannot stop themselves from being brutal, and it is upto the adult to know how to handle the situation. You have to be authoritative; gentle yet firm. The poor woman showed none of these traits and just took everything on as it came at her. She let things happen to her; a typical bully victim.

All in all, I just would like to say that these aren't some demonic kids from hell. They're just kids, and the lady should have received proper training from the school when she was hired to do the job.

Sure sound like an enabler to me.

So you are saying that this shit would have happened back in the 50's and 60's when society was more conservative? Sure the kids might have thought the things but would have the proper respect not to say shit.

Once again ignorant fools like you shame this community.


>> ^KnivesOut:

LOL when I saw that you were watching the video, I kept reloading the page to see what sort of ridiculous bullshit you would vomit out in the form of a comment.
I was not disappointed.
Actually, I blame conservatives for this, and I have just as little reason or justification as you do.>> ^bobknight33:
This is another example of why Liberalism is totally wrong and destructive to society.

So you are saying that this shit would have happened back in the 50's and 60's when society was more conservative? Sure the kids might have thought the things but would have the proper respect not to say shit.

Once again ignorant fools like you shame this community.
>> ^probie:

>> ^bobknight33:
This is another example of why Liberalism is totally wrong and destructive to society.

bobknight33, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.

>> ^bobknight33:

So you are saying that this shit would have happened back in the 50's and 60's when society was more conservative? Sure the kids might have thought the things but would have the proper respect not to say shit.
Once again ignorant fools like you shame this community.


Please refrain from name calling bobknight33, you are ironically rehearsing the same typical traits of a bully when you do that.

And as for your arguments, I agree with you that historical context may have conjured a different picture in this situation, but I disagree with your original argument about how a specific government policy is totally wrong and destructive to society. Abuse against outsiders took place throughout US history unrelated to any specific government policy. Children got bullied when they wore glasses, children got bullied when they had funny teeth, children got bullied when their family was poor.

Those old conservative morals held many beliefs that were just as harmful to their society as all the ironies and misguided policies of our contemporary society holds today. Christians bullied other other Christians in the name of loyalty, women were seen as lower class beings, musicians were seen as indecent and cast out from society. In fact bullying was more prevalent and consequences were often much more brutal in those days. Bullying against people of different race often led to physical violence, and even death during the 50s.


If you just focus on children's respect for adults throughout US history, then you could make the argument that liberalism downplayed authority of adults over children. But certainly conservative societies of the 50s weren't any better in terms of bullying. I will reserve the topic of 'changes in social dynamic between adult and children relations in coordination with changes in governmental policies' for you since I think this was actually your specific idea from the beginning.

It always blows me away when people talk about the 50's and 60's clearly recalling it like it was some old TV show. Whatever you do Bob don't recall the conservatively supported ideas of treating whole races (ALL races other than Caucasian really) as second class citizens... humiliation... violence... isolation... segregation... CONSERVATIVE!... IT WASN'T AN EPISODE OF LEAVE IT TO BEAVER NO MATTER HOW MUCH YOU WANT TO REMEMBER IT THAT WAY... And then you call others names... I really don't know why i would expect any better.

Hey bob, maybe google the words "civil rights" before talking about how nice and kind everyone was in the 50's and the 60's.

Those were good, conservative americans that enjoyed the freedom to discriminate and bully other human beings based on differences in appearance.

"Conservative" values still allowed men in white hoods to plant burning crosses on peoples lawns.>> ^bobknight33:

So you are saying that this shit would have happened back in the 50's and 60's when society was more conservative? Sure the kids might have thought the things but would have the proper respect not to say shit.
Once again ignorant fools like you shame this community.

Also, we gotta get 4chan on the case. They'll rape the kids parents and serve them as chili to them. That would be a good day.

>> ^gwiz665:

Also, we gotta get 4chan on the case. They'll rape the kids parents and serve them as chili to them. That would be a good day.


Or will just give her...as of now over Half a Million Dollars!

Either way, I'm cool with it.
>> ^Yogi:

>> ^gwiz665:
Also, we gotta get 4chan on the case. They'll rape the kids parents and serve them as chili to them. That would be a good day.

Or will just give her...as of now over Half a Million Dollars!

>> ^bobknight33:

So you are saying that this shit would have happened back in the 50's and 60's when society was more conservative? Sure the kids might have thought the things but would have the proper respect not to say shit.
Once again ignorant fools like you shame this community.
>> ^probie:
>> ^bobknight33:
This is another example of why Liberalism is totally wrong and destructive to society.

bobknight33, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.



You just proved to me and everyone else that you belong on that bus with the rest of the children.

Men in white hoods were from the democrat party. You remember Democrat senator Robert Bird. If the left were so interested in freedom why was he never commended by his party?



>> ^KnivesOut:

Hey bob, maybe google the words "civil rights" before talking about how nice and kind everyone was in the 50's and the 60's.
Those were good, conservative americans that enjoyed the freedom to discriminate and bully other human beings based on differences in appearance.
"Conservative" values still allowed men in white hoods to plant burning crosses on peoples lawns.>> ^bobknight33:
So you are saying that this shit would have happened back in the 50's and 60's when society was more conservative? Sure the kids might have thought the things but would have the proper respect not to say shit.
Once again ignorant fools like you shame this community.

Ohhhhh what happened?... did your argument completely fizzle out so you decided to change it?... You said LIBERAL... And just TRY to find me a liberal who doesn't condemn that man... while your at it, completely ignore the points made Bob... life was just fucking wonderful back then... damn those liberals...

>> ^bobknight33:

Men in white hoods were from the democrat party. You remember Democrat senator Robert Bird. If the left were so interested in freedom why was he never commended by his party?

>> ^KnivesOut:
Hey bob, maybe google the words "civil rights" before talking about how nice and kind everyone was in the 50's and the 60's.
Those were good, conservative americans that enjoyed the freedom to discriminate and bully other human beings based on differences in appearance.
"Conservative" values still allowed men in white hoods to plant burning crosses on peoples lawns.>> ^bobknight33:
So you are saying that this shit would have happened back in the 50's and 60's when society was more conservative? Sure the kids might have thought the things but would have the proper respect not to say shit.
Once again ignorant fools like you shame this community.

The scope of the discussion was kids taunting elders. Which would never have happened in the 50's and 60's. Only through liberals spouting personal freedoms incessantly through the decades have lead us to this action shown on the bus.


I was not talking about civil rights but you had to pull up that which was not part of the discussion and bend and twist to somehow justify you position. shameful.

Once again I am dealing with fools.

>> ^Januari:

Ohhhhh what happened?... did your argument completely fizzle out so you decided to change it?... You said LIBERAL... And just TRY to find me a liberal who doesn't condemn that man... while your at it, completely ignore the points made Bob... life was just fucking wonderful back then... damn those liberals...
>> ^bobknight33:
Men in white hoods were from the democrat party. You remember Democrat senator Robert Bird. If the left were so interested in freedom why was he never commended by his party?

>> ^KnivesOut:
Hey bob, maybe google the words "civil rights" before talking about how nice and kind everyone was in the 50's and the 60's.
Those were good, conservative americans that enjoyed the freedom to discriminate and bully other human beings based on differences in appearance.
"Conservative" values still allowed men in white hoods to plant burning crosses on peoples lawns.>> ^bobknight33:
So you are saying that this shit would have happened back in the 50's and 60's when society was more conservative? Sure the kids might have thought the things but would have the proper respect not to say shit.
Once again ignorant fools like you shame this community.

You deal with a fool every moment you live and breath Bob, that isn't likely to ever change.

>> ^bobknight33:

The scope of the discussion was kids taunting elders. Which would never have happened in the 50's and 60's. Only through liberals spouting personal freedoms incessantly through the decades have lead us to this action shown on the bus.

I was not talking about civil rights but you had to pull up that which was not part of the discussion and bend and twist to somehow justify you position. shameful.
Once again I am dealing with fools.
>> ^Januari:
Ohhhhh what happened?... did your argument completely fizzle out so you decided to change it?... You said LIBERAL... And just TRY to find me a liberal who doesn't condemn that man... while your at it, completely ignore the points made Bob... life was just fucking wonderful back then... damn those liberals...
>> ^bobknight33:
Men in white hoods were from the democrat party. You remember Democrat senator Robert Bird. If the left were so interested in freedom why was he never commended by his party?
>> ^KnivesOut:
Hey bob, maybe google the words "civil rights" before talking about how nice and kind everyone was in the 50's and the 60's.
Those were good, conservative americans that enjoyed the freedom to discriminate and bully other human beings based on differences in appearance.
"Conservative" values still allowed men in white hoods to plant burning crosses on peoples lawns.>> ^bobknight33:
So you are saying that this shit would have happened back in the 50's and 60's when society was more conservative? Sure the kids might have thought the things but would have the proper respect not to say shit.
Once again ignorant fools like you shame this community.