HEY NOW!

Well I kissed that rabbit at the pet store and she didn't turn into Judy -- and they called the cops!

It ain't easy bein' Furry, yo!

Some men are their own worst enemies and some men are their investors' worst enemy, and one man is both.

"Virtual currency".

Pick one.

I don't believe this was ever about taking Ukraine with the Russian military. I believe this is about destroying Ukraine and squeezing Europe's energy-dependent balls until the EU cracks under the economic pressure caused by the sanctions. This is already happening with Germany whimpering to Daddy Vladdy for all that precious, precious oil and gas. "Oh, we gave Zelensky a billion euros!"; yeah, and you gave Putin 25x that in oil/gas purchases.

The mealy-mouthing and dissembling has already begun, most shamefully from the New York Times, who is calling for Ukraine to make "hard choices". "This isn't capitulation" -- fuck you NYT, yes it is.

I had honest hopes that the western powers would show some spine and resolve, but as soon at their economies started to feel a little pain, the number of fucks given for Ukrainian lives went to zero. Russian is going to rape and murder its way from Odessa to the Belarus border until the western powers figure out some way to make it all Zelensky's fault or force him to cede massive amounts of Ukrainian territory before any real economic pain felt.

The worst part is that Finland and Sweden are going to be granted NATO membership, but Ukraine still is denied. Why are these two the hills NATO is willing to die on and Ukraine not? If NATO isn't willing to risk nuclear war over Ukraine, what happens when the tip of a single Russian boot touches Finnish soil? What happens when Finland then calls for Article 5 and the rest of NATO suddenly realizes shit just got real? What happens when it's time to shit or get off the pot; put up or shut up? Either NATO charges into the teeth of a potential nuclear war, or NATO is shown to be a paper tiger. If someone sees a middle ground, I'm interested in hearing it.

(Incidentally, NATO's Article 5 is pretty porous. A-5 doesn't say every NATO nation commits whatever forces are deemed necessary by the whole to defend against an aggressor. Instead, it says that in the event of A-5 coming into play, each member will take "such action as [the member state] deems necessary, including the use of armed force, to restore and maintain the security of the North Atlantic area."

Notice the whole 'each member' and 'deems necessary'? Yeah, to quote a popular movie 'I don't think this mutual defense pact means what you think it does'.)

American: "LAWSUIT!"
Mexico: "Lulz!"

Could, um, someone give me directions to Japan, please?

(Do they make these with bunnies? I'm asking for a friend. And by friend, I mean me penis.)

Bluesnews is still around?!

Love the cross-over!

Autism Simulator: When 4Chan meets Meta.

"And then he fucked it."

Yeah, but does it eat warts?

How many traffic laws did he break filming this? I'm 2 minutes in and I've counted about a half-dozen, including blowing through a red light.

Cite needed.

Mousou black: https://www.ko-pro.black/product/musou-black-paint/

Vanta Black: https://www.surreynanosystems.com/purchasing