Recent Comments by NetRunner subscribe to this feed

Why Obama Now - Simpson's animator weighs in

Slayer Fan Cat

Mitt Romney's Debate Performance: "Mostly Fiction"

NetRunner says...

Yeah, the supposed Romney tax cut seems to be an MC Escher drawing of everything he thinks his electoral coalition might like to hear about a tax plan, no matter how contradictory.

It's a giant tax cut that will put more money into the hands of the rich Job CreatorsTM.

But it won't blow up the deficit, because we're going to eliminate deductions to make up for every penny of lost revenue.

Which deductions? We won't say, but we promise what we do won't result in a shifting of the tax burden onto working and middle class households.

It is only physically possible to keep two of those promises at the same time. Romney would have to break at least one of them -- either his promise to stuff dollars into the pockets of billionaires, his promise not to raise taxes on working- and middle-class people, or his promise not to explode the deficit.

Personally I think the only promise he'd keep is to the rich. He'd raise taxes on the poor and blow up the deficit, just so he can maximize the amount of looting rich people get to do.

dystopianfuturetoday (Member Profile)

Bad Lip Reading - Paul Ryan has a video diary?

Obama says the real Mitt Romney didn't show up to debate

NetRunner says...

I'm gonna wait until after election day before saying it worked, but I agree, that's the most reasonable explanation for why Obama seemed so unwilling to go on the attack in the debate.

I'm hoping we hear him sound a lot more like this in the next one.
>> ^KnivesOut:

The President gave Mitt Jagger Romney enough rope to hang himself on, knowing that Romney's mouth is his own worst enemy, and it worked.
Obama's Approval Rating Soars to its Highest Point in Three Years

JiggaJonson (Member Profile)

Old School Computer Remix - Somebody That I Used to Know

Samuel L Jackson " Wake The F*ck UP " for Obama

THE SIMPSONS - Homer Votes Romney In 2012

NetRunner says...

My favorite bit was the Obamacare angle:

"Obama promised me death panels, and grandpa's still alive" - Strike against Obama, but ultimately he votes Romney because he invented Obamacare.

That perfectly captures just how totally fucked in the head people seem to be about that whole topic.

Leaked Video of Romney at Fundraiser -- You're all moochers!

NetRunner jokingly says...

>> ^bobknight33:

I agree, every one should pay a flat tax.
Corporations should also pay a flat tax.


Flat tax? You mean a flat percentage of your income? I disagree.

Everyone should just owe the first $50,000 of their income to the IRS. If you can't make that much, well, then we just put you in jail for tax evasion.

I mean, if you make it directly proportional to income, then it's not really fair, because the burden is still mostly falling on those most able to carry it, and that's way too close to the Marxist "from each according to ability, to each according to need."

You've gotta be some kind of socialist to agree to that. Lump sum taxes is the only way the founding fathers would've wanted things to be.

It's probably not necessary, but I'm gonna tick the sarcasm box anyways.

Disposable People

Leaked Video of Romney at Fundraiser -- You're all moochers!

NetRunner says...

>> ^JiggaJonson:

The bottom line here is that you lack the courage for your convictions. Take the license plate off of your car, cut up your social security card, and stop paying your taxes. Otherwise, you're just contributing to a system that you believe is impinging on a majority of the populace's freedoms (a hypocrite).


Actually, the reductio ad absurdum goes a little further. If you think the government "owns" the people because it can collect taxes from them with impunity, and you claim to really believe in the idea that liberty is indistinguishable from the unfettered exercise of property rights, then really, you should be defending any government exercise of power over its property, because it owns the people, and anything it does to its subjects is a legitimate exercise of liberty.

You already see them trotting out a form of this argument anytime there's a major management/labor dispute in the press. From there, you only really need to change a few words, and you wind up with almost exactly the rationale given by royalists in favor of hereditary monarchies in middle-age Europe.

Conservatives are more or less living out the final chapters of Animal Farm now. Their supposed dedication to principles born from a rebellion against authoritarian monarchies has, over the ensuing decades, been slowly twisted until it's become a rationale for establishing a new monarchy on this side of the Atlantic.

I keep waiting for the day I see a clip of some wingnut on Fox News declaring four legs good, two legs better that monarchy is a superior form of government to democracy because then those undesirable people we're always bitching about would truly know their place...

Mitt Romney's Idea of Helping the Poor

JiggaJonson (Member Profile)



Send this Article to a Friend



Separate multiple emails with a comma (,); limit 5 recipients






Your email has been sent successfully!

Manage this Video in Your Playlists

Beggar's Canyon