That's fucking retarded. If it's ok to allow telecom companies to direct internet traffic on wireless networks, then why isn't it ok for them to control wired networks? What's the difference?

Neither is ok, we're just supposed to fucking take this and say thank you.

Fucking goddamn bullshit this is fucking unbelievable. How the fucking shit is this in the peoples best fucking interest? Who the fuck is running things over there? China?

fap...fap..fap...

:'(

I can understand seeing him as a threat. But shooting him 5 times till he's dead as fuck after having given him 4 seconds to drop a knife he's legally allowed to carry is just good fun.

Anyways, the investigation ruled that the shooting was unjustified and homeboys going away for murder.

holy crap i should be able to upvote twice, he got me a second time, after i had paused and commented and he called me out on having opened a tab of wpedias plumber butt.

got me lmao'ing at drawing boxes on the desktop!

then i paused the video to do just that.

it's 1:30 a.m.

kill me.

*beg

>> ^Hybrid:

Why not join in the fun? http://files.hl2forums.com.nyud.net/uploads/e6a25c9_JS_LOIC_v0_1.htm

>> ^quantumushroom:

Fencing stolen information? You mean publishing whistleblower documents?
Assangle published the finook traitor's stolen classified documents. That's a crime.
You should check out dystopianfuturetoday's video about that. It's even broadcast on your favorite news station.
You mean America's favorite news station?
A foreign enemy like bin laden? If he would, he'd have been free for at least 10 more years.
The wikiclown isn't a diaperheaded billionaire with a network of jihadist vermin. But it sure looks like he could've used a spidey hole about now.


No. It's not a crime. Manning committed the crime. Then he blabbed about it and is getting what he deserves.

Uncovering secrets is what real journalism is all about.

What's going on here is pure fucking evil perpetrated by the incestuous marriage of business and politics.

When it comes to shining a light on the truth that none of you fucks are free, the cables, the collateral murder video and all the rest is nothing compared to the reaction to them, by business and politics.

@AnimalsForCrackers

Wait so the separation letter came after the first amendment? The separation letter is specifically meant to explain? Wtf are we arguing about? Damn sophists...

From Wikipedia:

The concept of separation of church and state refers to the distance in the relationship between organized religion and the nation state. The term is an offshoot of the phrase, "wall of separation between church and state," as written in Thomas Jefferson's letter to the Danbury Baptists Association in 1802. The original text reads: "...I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should 'make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,' thus building a wall of separation between Church & State."[1] The phrase was quoted by the United States Supreme Court first in 1878, and then in a series of cases starting in 1947. The phrase itself does not appear in the U.S. Constitution. The First Amendment to the Constitution states that "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof."

Kinda Relevant

(Sorry for double-post)

It's really fucked up because a sock, according to wikipedia, is actually an item of clothing worn on the feet. Now, red socks are from Boston. It's interesting to contemplate the nature of this mans decision to represent red socks. Anyhow, what's important to remember, is that though very few of us would wear red socks with black shoes, we ought to defend to the death this mans right to dress himself.

Still though, that red tie is fucking bullshit.

Also, I think Wikileaks is a pretty cool guy, eh leeks truth and doesnt afraid of anything.

>> ^r10k:

It's also a shame that once you got older and read it no one was there to help you with it.

You don't find it at all curious that an all-knowing being would write a book filled with ambiguous proclamations? Why are there no worthwhile revelations? Why are there no epiphany inducing moments? Why is the bible not clear about what it wants from us? Why isn't it Godly?

A book written by The Creator to his creations shouldn't require teams of people studying it to understand it's meanings.

The Bible is bronze-age dogma.

Let's not be ashamed of our past ignorance. Let us have respect for the awkward adolescent that humanity was when the bible was written. Like a junior high student at his first boy-girl party, experimenting blindly. Let us admire the valiant, if not adorable, first attempts of a child trying to understand his world. Let us be proud of histories best attempts.

However, let us put history in the history books. Let us enshrine our obsolete belief systems in a museum, where they belong, to be worshiped as a parent worships a child's first steps. Not for it's content, but for it's context.

Please, let us. It's time.

We don't want to have to drag you into the 22nd century kicking and screaming

No, ofc life isn't black and white.

"Are cops evil or not?" This is silly and anyone who inferred from my posts that I think cops are evil is handling me with retard gloves. I don't need to be reminded that things aren't black and white, and it seems like every time the pattern of abusive cops comes up, numerous people feel the need to talk about all the great cops out there. It's like a kid tells his mom he doesn't like tomatoes, and she says, hey now, fruits are great! Don't forget, you need fruits. Now, eat your tomatoes.

We don't need bad cops, and I think there are too many bad cops. If the occurrence of abuse was reduced to a thousandth of what it is now, that might be acceptable "spillage". But it's not. Either it's getting worse, or we finally have the means, through the net, to communicate the scale. An important question is what's an acceptable amount of "bad cops" within our society? 100 out of 1,000,000? 1000? 10000?

Once we decide we are grooming too many bad cops, then we can look to solutions, unless we can't even agree that a tomato is a fruit...

But anyhow, as far as solutions go - it's a complex double rainbow of factors. I suspect it starts with socioeconomic disadvantages and education.

But, I definitely don't have all the solutions. Thanks for reminding me, @NetRunner.

>> ^Lawdeedaw:

So, point out the millions of videos of cops acting bad... What about the lazy citizens, criminal citizens and such who act worse?Your justification for a cops "bad behaviour" is that criminals act much worse? How like criminals do you think cops should act?>> ^Lawdeedaw:
Is our nation's society, the system we all run by, or any other nation's system for that matter, broken? Broken is the wrong word. The right word would be imperfect. Given that society is a constantly evolving system, hopefully to the benefit of the whole, broken is a silly word. So let's try again:>> ^Lawdeedaw:
Is our nation's society, the system we all run by, or any other nation's system for that matter, imperfect? Yes. Emphatically, yes.
>> ^Lawdeedaw:
The mother who sprays her child with a pressure washer? The crackhead who leaves her baby in a car, or let's her baby suffocate in the couch because she is passed out? WHY! Motherhood must be a flawed system! Or the robber who shoots the head off a bank teller? Why, open banks are flawed systems!False analogy. Attributing a bank teller's head being blown off to open banks is the same as attributing an innocent man's innocenter dogs murder during a police raid to the unarmored nature of the dog.>> ^Lawdeedaw:

Please spare the hyperbole...The irony! It's thick! >> ^Lawdeedaw:
cops are people who need weeded just like every other person-- Here we agree. Everyone needs to get a little weeded every now and then.>> ^Lawdeedaw:
... And more get fired than before too.[citation needed] You sound like a religious zealot who bashes atheists.???

You sound like one hand clapping.

>> ^Lawdeedaw:
And what have you done personally to change the system? Do you vote for or against Sheriffs who are elcected officals? Have you written to a mayor about abuse? No? Have you supported candidates who can effect change? No?No. I've done none of these things.

But what of you? Have you organized parades in support of the judicial system? Have you given back rubs to your local "S"herrif? No? Have you ever purchased a sexy policeman calendar? No?

Ahh, well, then, your argument must be invalid.
>> ^Matthu:
>> ^lantern53:
If every police officer in this country acted this way, there would be armed revolution.
But these are two shitbirds out of hundreds of thousands of honest cops who risk their lives to keep the peace and try to preserve justice.
Don't judge thousands of cops on the basis of these two idiots who should be canned...or caned.
Would you like to be judged by the action of one of your co-workers?
Don't be a knee-jerk clone and try to paint all police officers by the actions of these two.

Lol... Getting so sick of hearing this bullshit copy pasta. How many videos of abusive cops need to be put up before they're considered evidence of a flawed justice system.
You're the clone, open your eyes. If police officers continue to act this way there will be an armed revolution.
And I'm not judging hundreds of thousands of cops on the basis of these two idiots. I'm judging the system which creates an unacceptable amount of abusers.