There was no point whatsoever to this. The use of these planes is to train people to become accostomed to the "Feeling" of weightlessness. There is no "Zero G" here, it is strictly a frefall. There are no "effects on cats" to be tested here, it was simply cruelty for their enjoyment.

Her whole foundation at the beginning was full of cattle scat.

Well, a couple of comments.

First, not sure about this being a "hunt", from first look, it seems like a "caged" ranch (fences in the background). Those types of hunts are pure garbage.

Secondly, hunting is a normal part of wildlife management, regardless of the species. I, personally, only hunt for food, however, big game hunting in Africa does manage herd numbers and bring much needed money to locals.

Hunters in the USA, pay over $1 billion in taxes every year, and contribute more than any other individual organization, for wildlife and land conservation.

Unethical, untrained, and uneducated hunters give such a bad name to hunting.

We need to get rid of these "Weekend warriors" (such as the moron in the video.) No knowledgable hunter would have to shoot that many times, nor have someone "instruct" them when and when not to shoot.

One shot, humane kill. And, for those of you who eat meat and want to complain about hunting, take a look at how your caged animals are processed before you start in on hunting. In true hunting, animals have a chance... a beef cow has no other option but to die for your enjoyement at the dinner table.

I hate it when people become completely retarded to try to prove a point that was insane to begin with.

The Constitution does garantee freedom of speech, however, there are limits to that speech.

Billboards for adult entertainment do not show nudity... why?
You won't hear someone say "Fu*k Bush!" on national TV... why?
"The Who" is not going to start a concert in your neighbors yard... why?
You are not going to stay on a plane very long after yelling "I love terrorists!"... why?

The kid was on the side of a road, not private property. He had a sign using profanity. He argued with the police.

Bottom line, police were right, kid and moron followers were wrong.

The shortest Amendment to the Constitution states "A well regulated militia, being necessary for the security of a free state, the rights of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed" Try standing on the side of the road waving a gun around. Same principle.

I never realized it until now... Potsey is nothing but Riker from STNG without a mustache.

Totally faked.

After viewing the "full" video...

First, they were obviously marching in protest, without a permit. I'm sure with a permit, cars would not be having to drive around them.

Secondly, they brought the children. I dispise seeing parents use their children as pawns in their battles. They were the ones endangering the children, not the police.

And, lastly, they were ILLEGALLY impeding a lawful GOVERNMENT workplace. Not a bright idea. The gov is gonna win out on that battle.

It wasn't a legal protest, it was a loud mob, plain and simple.

They may disagree with recruiters coming into high-schools, but the last time the Supreme Court ruled on this, it was allowed. If you are going to protest something, protest "carreer day", not just the recruiters.

What... is she living in 1982? To make it sound like this is something spectacular is a tad overdoing it.

As long as I was born with CANINE TEETH, I'm eatin' meat.

It's quite easy to talk about all of this after the fact. But, if you think back, everybody was still thinking "crash" up until the second plane hit.

Contacts ARE made, this is standard. Wether it is a 747 crashing because of engine failure or other.

And, commenting on the reaction of Bush (which, I am NOT a supporter of. I just had the second guessing psychobable that seems to come out. Bush is NOT the coordinator of FAA/NORAD/FEMA/NSA/Secret Service, or anything other than the situation he is currently in, he is simply the elected leader. Otherwise, the whole US government would fall apart every night when he went to sleep.

Would they have rather had him run out of the elementary school screaming?

That would have helped the whole "terror" thing, now wouldn't it?

The simple truth is, there were actions going on. People were being mobilized. Agencies were doing their jobs.

A lot of this conspiricy garbage is as if, anytime someone cleared their throat, that it was proof of some sort of coverup. Now, everyone goes out and looks for the times people cleared their throats.

(And, everyone seems to forget that even Democrats clear their throats.)

Ok, so the idea that Kennedy might have been shot by someone else, is quite understandable. However, to believe something along the lines of which these conspiricy theorists are asking us to believe, is way over the top.

Need I remind that, although there is a Republican President, it does not mean that every government worker, every civilian contractor, and anyone else involved in Aviation/Security/World Trade/Communications/Defense is now somehow part of the Republican party.

Most of the things that are spouted off are not even backed up with anything. I mean, seriously, how many cousins does Bush HAVE?

It is normal for people to take events and investigate, question, and try to understand. But I bet you can find these sort of ties with pretty much any event in current history, if you tried. It does not make the conclusions drawn, any more truthfull.

Everyone talkes about the "controlled demolition" garbage. We have lots of information regarding that. Now, how much information do we have regarding near fully loaded aircraft striking skyscrapers and the aftermath thereof? Well... unless you have a ton of information showing me how they should have fallen otherwise... I still can't make the same connection.

I can show you THOUSANDS of buildings, burned and destroyed, in which they didn't land all over a five mile radius. What else would you expect?

Oh, so they fell from the top down? As apposed to what?

I understand the hatred of Bush. There are ENOUGH things the he has done in public eye, to hate him over. Let's not start looking completely insane while we try to vilify him.

Ah the joys that people seem to find when they hold up in an enclosed building with running internal combustian engines.

Anyone who thinks this was intentional biased reporting on the part of Fox news, to put this man into bad light, should stay with the Democratic party.

It was a clip from comical interview, on the Comedy Network, and as far as I can tell, the Fox reporters were laughing as well. So, they cut out the pauses between the question and answers... yet they still kept the huge amount of laughter.

Get real.

Do you think you have a monopoly on understanding that it was clips from a comedy program? Believe me, even Republicans realize that.

Do you think it takes some sort of "investegatory reporting" to find out where this clip came from, and the intentions of the program for having the interview?

Come on.

Is it just me, or did I see Esther from "Sanford & Son" being interviewd?

Man... have I been out of the states for that long? I never saw this one coming.

Things pass ya' when you live in a developing country.

Dang, and the dad from the Brady Bunch... ouch.