Yay! I like corporate generosity!

That's a great link! I agree 100% with the argument he provided about this film. While 20th Century Fox will say Colonial Marines is "canon" I'm not really a believer, after all if Resurrection is canon, I revoke their canon-giving ability. I guess I agree about the score, it actually has some good themes to it. While Horner's and Goldsmith's scores are good as well in their own ways, they are much more atmospheric.

Yeah I know David Fincher doesn't want squat to do with Alien3, hence the quotes. However, if I recall properly, the assembly cut was advertised as being much more in line with Fincher's original thoughts for the project than the truncated version that ended up in theaters. I think the assembly cut makes this much underrated film more interesting by a significant margin. This movie reeks of death, decay, and the feelings of loss and search for meaning that accompanies death. If it was the last film I really think it could have found a following as correctly ending the series instead of that awful Alien Resurrection. *GAG*

Two things I wish would be fixed though are 1) The horribly composited alien (it looks like bad CG, but it is just badly composited) and 2) Why an alien egg was brought on board the Sulaco. It is just too much of a leap of faith to believe the queen laid it. (supposed to be somewhat explained by the upcoming alien colonial marines game, but that's not really canon or a fix to the existing film).

Anyways, back on topic. What I find interesting is that they had a "full" model of the queen chestburster with legs and tail.

That's kind of interesting. Considering that from what I understand the chestburster popping out was a much delayed change to the story done by the studio takeover after Fincher left. I still think the "david fincher" cut is really interesting and my preferred way to watch the movie now.

This is awesome! I love the guy who sold both of his kidneys for cash... he seems the happiest of the bunch. Look at him boogie!

Beautiful in so many ways... really transcends language and culture.

Seems very Tim & Eric style comedy. I love it though.

I didn't realize you needed to coax/teach a dog to bark. Having a dog that didn't bark would be far preferable.

Ha! Those ants aren't the supreme overlords I thought they were... *puts away his "All Hail Ant Overlord" sign*

The stupid people are breeding!

Hopefully, it far less than a couple centuries before the view of creationists are a significant minority viewpoint in our culture as it is holding back our future as Mr. Nye said.

To the creationist who spent a lot of time writing up his beliefs. Yes, it does take a "leap of faith" to accept current scientific theory. However, science never claims to be 100% correct unlike the teachings of most religious fundamentalists. Most time in science is proving current theories wrong, and adapting our scientific model to fit new theories. That is the strength of science. So if you can't accept the current theory, great! Come up with some other PROOF for our existence instead of buying into a cult that has no proof. They have assumptions based on a 2000 year old fairy tale, and the feeling "in their heart" that is it true. For me I need more repeatable/accurate proof than that to accept a theory. Sure, in all of recorded history, we look at C12 decay rates and they have been accurate, but instead of coming up with repeatable proof on why C12 isn't accurate, let's just instead assume that they are completely wrong. Looking at just the proof human fossils, the theory of evolution writes a more clear picture to me of the origin of our species than the origin of our species as described in a book. Supposedly, this book is somehow considered divine knowledge by some. Even though, it was written long before we had any understanding of virii, bacteria, or the microbiological world. Doesn't sound very divine or all knowing to me. It was the best explanation that a primitive people had to explain and live in the world around them. Which modern science and culture should be long past.

If it is the bible we're talking about, if you live in today's government, you already accept certain elements as out-dated and irrelevant. Unless you still stone people for adultery, worshipers of other religions, or disobeying their parents. Or if you think that the animal should be stoned in a bestiality case. Or you think that someone looking at a woman menstruating will cause your eyes to bleed. I've hope you've "grown up" from those archaic beliefs. Why is species origin any different?

What I normally tell creationists and other anti-science viewpoints, is that if you don't believe in science, don't believe in medical science either. Stay in a church praying to your creator when you get sick or need modern medicine to improve your chances of survival. I'm sure your creator will save you...

Granted there only appears to be 2 shots of meows... it was edited together very well. Plus the ending is just epic.

Yeah it sucks how much this rings true. If I had to choose I think I would still choose the narcissistic USA to the totalitarian viewpoint of North Korea. If only there was a happy medium somewhere? (Denmark or Sweden perhaps)

I re-watched that video multiple times thinking of your comment and it brightened my day. Imaging that girl transforming into some sort of human/seagull hybrid. Hilarious!
>> ^ctrlaltbleach:

OMG! That girl sound like a seagull when she screams shark.