"Why are you multiplying, sir?! DON'T MULTIPLY!"

"Oh, you've GOT to multiply..."

I had no idea that two of the most memorable shows of my childhood were linked by Uncle Phil.

I've done it once. Back when I shared an apartment, I had to pee really bad and the roommate was in the bathroom. Thanks, kitchen sink!

@kymbos Wow... He really does.

The end indicates that this is his feelings of 20th Century Fox as a whole, not just The Simpsons. The Simpsons have been pretty notorious over the years for portraying their own show as the villain in order to bring about a much greater truth of the giant companies that help bring the show into existence. (For example, Fox has been scrutinized countless amounts of times over the years.)

@Mcboinkens Um, yes it does. The kid is two. Not only does he know his termonology and names, but his enunciation is pretty remarkable as well. At this age, him showing such an interest in these things and spending so much time with it, even if it's just memorizing key words, is a great start. If he can get the basics down (even if he's not grasping the true science behind them... jeez, what do you expect?) at such a young age, it'll be much easier for him to grasp more complicated concepts as he gets older. So yes, it DOES say something about him and his future. The kid is smart. Again, not sure about your expectations for a two year old, but this is outstanding.

"You could've said anything! His 'Ding-a-ling', his 'Winky', anything!" ...Really? Are we 10 years old, Steve?

What a dumb douchebag.

I saw the first movie right after reading the book, and found myself very disappointed in it. That is, except for the portrayal of Lisbeth, which was pretty spot-on. I'm curious if I would've liked the film more had I not read the book (and I don't want to sound like one of those 'the book was better!' snobs), it just felt like they rushed (or completely left out) parts that I felt were extremely crucial to the story. Plus, leaving out the entire story about Millennium is crazy to me, as I found it to be very interesting and important to the overall plot. I mean, it's the name of the trilogy ferchrissakes!

Don't get me wrong, I didn't think the film was bad, just could've been a lot better. Regardless, I'm eager to watch this.

@spoco2 Fair enough. Still looks like a fun watch to me. I'm sort of hoping rifftrax works their magic on it, because that'll be the closest to new Mystery Science Theater that we'll get anytime soon.

Before you knock the film, read this:

"I think everyone here has missed what is the real story with this film. If it has any level of critical and in articular financial success it could be a major turning point in film making.

Even though D9 was done on a small budget that is small by standard SciFi movie budget standards. Compared to MONSTERS, D9 was a big budget film. MONSTERS was done with literally a handful of people and that includes the actors, director and behind the camera people including the sound guy.

HOW MONSTERS WAS MADE:

ACTORS: Only 2 actors were involved, all other persons are extras found at the time of filming.

SETTINGS: They went to several real world locations , no movie studio sets. Everything was a real place.

FILMING: The camera team consisted of 2 people, the guy holding the 1 camera they used (they only used 1 camera to do this movie). The camera guy was the director and he had 1 person assisting and that was the entire camera team. They did have 1 sound guy and that was the extent of the non-actor staff other then the editor.

EDITING/SPECIAL EFFECTS: The film was edited and all special effects done using a consumer laptop; something you can buy from BEST BUY.
They edited the movie using a consumer laptop.

So these 2 actors along with the director and 1 camera assistance plus a sound guy and an editor (6 people total) went on the road and filmed as they went. And now this thing is getting serious press via the trailer circulating and it is going to get a theatrical release.

How is this not something incredible in this day of multi-million dollar big budget productions that involved hundreds to thousands of people?" ~Screenrant.com

Seriously, how they did it alone is reason enough to watch the film. It won't be big budget, but you shouldn't expect it to be. And those two sites aren't the only places singing it's praise. I've yet to read a single negative review coming out of film festivals.

I'd wind up hurting myself trying to race the lights up and down.

I do enjoy the guy on the bike who was right under the tree, looked down and found the lone dollar. "Hey! It's my lucky day!" he probably thought to himself.

Apparently, while this was happening, a giant sea creature came up from the waters on the other side of the boat. While the horrifying shrieks of sheer pain and panic can be heard, it eluded the camera once again.

Can't believe this wasn't an immediate Top 15 at least. The sift usually loves creative autotuning, and this was really well done (and super catchy).

The story sounds like a complete rehash of Army of Two 2 (which also sucked).