Man, they had some great visibility to shoot this with.

Trying to do this right now myself, but instead of submarine, just trying to design and build a sailboat from a mix of preexisting boating materials and my own designs. Probably won't get as far as he did. This is good stuff (even if it looks like a watery coffin).

Your video, Highspeed Hydrofoil tries to go "Submarine Mode", has made it into the Top 15 New Videos listing. Congratulations on your achievement. For your contribution you have been awarded 1 Power Point.

spinning celibacy submarine!

I've seen a long clip of this interview and it gets even sadder. I'm paraphrasing here but Don says "I heard from a guy who lived in a nuclear submarine. Now I can't empathize with him because I don't live on a Nuclear Submarine but I imagine I would be pretty disappointed I could not own an xbox one.

To clarify, mantis shrimp don't create sonoluminescence in the same way that pistol shrimp do, by "squeezing their claws together". They create it when the smack things, like snails, really hard with their raptorial appendages.

Another interesting angle to think about: We have all of this scientific interest in sonoluminescence, and the host of cool hypotheses mentioned, not just because it's cool. ..but because, among other things, the Navy REALLY wants to understand the process of cavitation, and throws money at research on the subject. Why? because ship and submarine propellers also create cavitation, and they want to create war machines that are not loud and whose propellers last longer.

Her conclusion would seem to support a case of "life imitating art". (Direct quote from the SeaQuest DSV wikipedia) :

"The series follows the adventures of the high-tech submarine seaQuest DSV (Deep Submergence Vehicle) operated by the United Earth Oceans Organization (UEO), a global coalition of up-world countries and undersea confederations, similar to the United Nations, which was created following a major showdown of nations that occurred c. 2017. "

It's already 2013 and people are finally trying to get the ocean version of NASA off and running. Now if we could just have flying cars and lightsabers.....

>> ^Phreezdryd:

I'm going to assume it's quite warm wherever this is, but I'm sure we'd all like to know what they're yelling at each other.


Warm ... OR ... they didn't want to get weighted down with clothing when they got out to push =oD

Indeed a translation would be nice!

In reply to this comment by lurgee:
u haz excellent taste my dear! 8
In reply to this comment by PlayhousePals:
Big fan! Love TD =oD



I've thought the same thing about you as well =o)

@gorillaman, ok, so people should be free to express their ideas, but not free to have different ideas or ideologies from each other. How does that work?

I love how you apply the word "anarchy" to the economy, as if the natural state of things is not people independently trading with each other, but government ownership and control of all the world's resources, when in fact most of what happens in the world's economy is in such a tremendously vast and complex scale that I can't imagine a single entity keeping track of all that, let alone coordinating it.

I can only imagine, though, how incredibly immoral and oppressive such a world would be. Something like Soviet Russia? I'm sure they had their own standards of efficiency, and hell yeah, the soviets were pretty efficient at sending a man into orbit, making nuclear bombs, nuclear submarines... not so much at erradicating poverty though, or not completely enslaving and slowly starving millions of people, or avoiding the total collapse of their economy.

If you're so worried about harm to third parties, how about the catastrophe of having a third party meddling with every economic transaction? That's TWO parties being directly harmed right there, for every single transaction. Is that a catastrophe worth mentioning?

Space exploration? Submarines? Airplanes?

>> ^eric3579:

Up to 45km. http://www.qwiki.com/q/RPK-2_Viyuga
>> ^Nebosuke:
It seems like an inefficient system. These missiles must not go very far.



So it compares to a UUM-44 SUBROC... a missile developed in 1958, finished in 1963, and never deployed. "A type of submarine-launched rocket deployed by the United States Navy as an anti-submarine weapon." Wow... the Russians are showing off advanced weaponry...

Translation:

Our long impressive submarine stands erect!
In the presence of the pernicious space-laser-boobs!
We will rocket-fire all the holes to exploding a retrieve our fantastic goal!
To shoot the sun! To shoot the sun!!!!

♫ We olive on a yellow submarine... ♫

Let's give Tucker everything he wants- tanks, planes, submarines- whatever he thinks he needs, then send him, and him alone, into Iran to accomplish his goal.

Maybe the other cowardly chickenhawks like W, Cheney, Fromme, Quantummushroom and the like can go as well, but only the true believers. The rest of humanity gets to sit this one out.

>> ^jonny:

Here's the version from the animated Yellow Submarine movie, which is what all the animated bits here are from.


No wonder it didn't come up in search, didn't think to put sixty-four in number form