An exotic fruit to you ignoramus is just another ordinary fruit in the their country.

So tired of these videos. ZERO educational value, especially these "Kids React"-types, bordering on child abuse (of their innocent inexperience) IMO and made to make fun of other countries' food staples.

Stuff your hotdogs & SPAMs down your mouth holes and call it funny will ya?

Kids react to lack of bloatware and shitty UI.

Your video, Kid reacting to VR rollercoaster thrill ride, has made it into the Top 15 New Videos listing. Congratulations on your achievement. For your contribution you have been awarded 1 Power Point.

Not the best Kids React video I've ever seen, but the little girl makes a good point about how the marketing for what was basically a binder made this product what it was.

Poppy Reacts To Kids' React to Poppy: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xqH3KaW25AA

Either a drama queen or I can see an autistic kid reacting like this.

Im not surprised for kids of this age not to know.

For more of this i give you, Kids react to old technology. I always get a kick out of these. Kids are hillarious and awesome.
VCR https://youtu.be/kesMOzzNBiQ
ROTARY PHONE https://youtu.be/XkuirEweZvM
WALKMAN https://youtu.be/Uk_vV-JRZ6E
TYPEWRITERS https://youtu.be/vfxRfkZdiAQ
OLD CAMERAS https://youtu.be/DDtWxURLlPk
OLD COMPUTER https://youtu.be/PF7EpEnglgk

yeah... I actually really liked Elders React, and even the kids react every now and then.

But fuck them. Fuck them hard. I unsubscribed both their channel and the react channel already

Not at all from my read.
To me, it's like trademarking the word "news!", forcibly removing any videos labeled "news!", and insisting anyone that posts one pay them 1/2 the revenue they might make...and probably taking it too far and going after those making 'news' claiming they're also infringing and forcing them to pay or defend themselves in court.
It's not at all as specific as you claim.
I see the difference in your analogy, but I totally disagree with your characterization. It's far more like trademarking 'news!' than trademarking 'news filmed and broadcast from a window of a bathysphere sitting in your swimming pool'. If it were that specific, there would be no outrage.
If they didn't come up with it, it's not their idea...and 'humans react to' videos is NOT distinctive enough by far, IMO, and in the opinion of MOST people. If they actually limited it to videos with the exact format of people watching unseen videos at an angle, and the exact same title of "Kids React!" they're still over reaching to control something they did not invent and should not own. Kids reacting was a genre of video/photograph LONG before they started making them, and if the reaction is exciting, using an exclamation point is normal English, as is capitalization of all words in a title.

They have no right to 'protect' something they didn't invent by taking other people's money, first that's not protection, it's simple extortion, second, it's theft, since it's not even their idea in the first place.
They don't have to be the first, possibly, but they certainly shouldn't be able to trademark a common phrase that existed before their company, or a format that existed long before their company, which is what they did.
If they want to 'protect their brand', they need to re-name it something that's not already a common phrase, otherwise they're trying to co-opt a commonly used phrase (that they didn't come up with in the first place) and extort money from those who commonly use it under threat of lawsuit. They also need to steer FAR away from attempting to enforce it against ANY video not in their EXACT format, including font, capitalization, punctuation, stated video format, content, etc. It a video doesn't meet EVERY standard there, they should leave it alone. I'm fairly certain that's NOT their intent, as it would make it impossible for them to extort money and make this move useless.


EDIT: Can we at least agree that, if a company is going to do something like this that COULD be a huge over reach and could easily be abused to both extort money and remove any competition, and their spokes people do such a piss poor job of explaining what they're doing that it sounds like they're using the law to steal property and money from actual content creators and erase those they can't control, while creating absolutely nothing themselves, and offering nothing for the money they forcibly take, that that company deserves ALL the ridicule and losses that follow, and their best move left would be to drop the entire thing rather than continuing and making numerous failed attempts to explain themselves?

Kids React To: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9l02Nea46og

Kids React To: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OZCRbmy7-CE

Bonus: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L4mCx9JZoU4

I wouldn't say abusive. Kids react strangely to different things, and often you'll get this reaction one day but they'll like it a week later.

Remember, as a parent it's not your job to keep the kid smiling all the time, it's your job to bring them up properly. Getting them to eat a good variety of healthy foods is one of those responsibilities.

But yes, you're right, there are limits to this. My kid at the moment will eat fusilli pasta but not penne. It's annoying as fuck, it's just a different shape but he'll flatly refuse anything that isn't spiralled! But that's just his way at the moment. I'm not going to force the issue. When he's older I'll explain it to him and hopefully he'll understand.

When kids are this tiny there's no explaining, but there's also no rush. But you shouldn't give up on a food straight away otherwise they'll end up eating nothing. It's all about balance.

I sometimes put salt on my food.

Next time on Kids React we see how kids react to eating a bowl of salt!

Yeah, not quite that young, but some epic kids

Had my mate from Japan here last week...he taught the kids class entirely in Japanese. Watching the young kids react was priceless