Siskel and Ebert defend Star Wars

Snooty film Critic John Simon rips apart the original Star Wars trilogy, and Siskel and Ebert correct him.
SFOGuysays...

And, other than this brief moment, no one appears to have thought about Mr. Simon at the time or since. Which appears, except for this internet clip reburial, to be entirely appropriate.
*promote

bluecliffsays...

As someone who loves Star Wars I don't think the critic was snooty at all. Ebert and Siskel are 2nd rate, populist dudes (which doesn't mean I don't like them - I just recognize what they ARE)...

Star Wars is good. It's just that it really does belong to a dehumanized era, which IS (also) childish...

but we late humans are both of those things... and Star Wars is one of the best dehumanized/childish art options around...

Stormsingersays...

I can't say I agree with Simon, but I certainly don't agrfee with Ebert, Siskel, or (sorry) bluecliff. Star Wars was pretty crappy when it first came out, in every way but special effects, and none of the subsequent episodes got any better. A trite, cliched story combined with wooden acting and moronic, stilted dialog don't make for a good time, in my opinion.

The shameless flipflopping and revisionist history Lucas presented over the years since then pretty well sealed my distaste. First, it had nothing to do with Campbell's Hero's Journey (my guess is that he had no idea who Campbell was at that time), then later, when Campbell became such a fad, well of -course- it was inspired by the Hero's Journey all along. Even Hollywood types should be able to provide a better fake sincerity than Lucas.

Enzobluesays...

As someone who saw Star Wars when it first came out, (I was 12), it completely blew me away. I still remember the feeling. That's what films should be like. I can't imagine anyone not liking it for what it was. I can imagine people not liking it because it's sci-fi,, because they have no desire to let go of reality for 2hrs, because they have no capacity for wonder, or because Lucas now sucks and so retroactively sucked, or because they want to be different.

xxovercastxxsays...

Interesting. I dislike Star Wars quite a bit but I still disagree with everything Simon said.

I've always found some of the core elements of Star Wars to be very intriguing, but the execution to be absolutely terrible. All the corniness always yanks me out of the story.

*nochannel *80s *scifi *cinema *1sttube *news *talks

Stormsingersays...

I didn't like it because I'd been a huge science fiction fan for almost a decade by that time. I was simply used to a better class of story. My distaste for Lucas came along later, as he earned it.

Enzobluesaid:

As someone who saw Star Wars when it first came out, (I was 12), it completely blew me away. I still remember the feeling. That's what films should be like. I can't imagine anyone not liking it for what it was. I can imagine people not liking it because it's sci-fi,, because they have no desire to let go of reality for 2hrs, because they have no capacity for wonder, or because Lucas now sucks and so retroactively sucked, or because they want to be different.

Send this Article to a Friend



Separate multiple emails with a comma (,); limit 5 recipients






Your email has been sent successfully!

Manage this Video in Your Playlists




notify when someone comments
X

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
  
Learn More