1,260 views
1:36 N
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
12 Comments
MrFisk*quality
siftbotBoosting this quality contribution up in the Hot Listing - declared quality by MrFisk.
oritteropo*length=96
siftbotThe duration of this video has been updated from unknown to 1:36 - length declared by oritteropo.
rich_magnetCool concept. I didn't figure out how it was done until the end.
PaybackMeh, nudity for the sake of being naked. That video with the nudists and the clothes-gun-toting hunters made more of a statement. This is just a peepshow.
spawnflaggersurprised at how few people wear underwear to a photoshoot...
apparently the disappearing paint only goes through 1 layer of clothing (and banana peels).
blacklotus90really cool *nsfw stuff!
siftbotVideo is already flagged NSFW - ignoring nsfw request by blacklotus90.
poolcleanerThere should be nothing wrong with nudity for any sake. Nudity is a natural freedom that is unnaturally restricted and incorrectly considered as something which requires special circumstances. What about expression as the circumstance?
I was not aroused (And even if I was, so what?) but I enjoyed their natural beauty and the clever approach to the nude. Is a painting of a nude somehow more acceptable than a filmed nude? What is the point of either art form, if not the simple and profound concept of human dignity. Not a peep show any more than a series of nude paintings. Both are artistic expressions.
Meh, nudity for the sake of being naked. That video with the nudists and the clothes-gun-toting hunters made more of a statement. This is just a peepshow.
enoch*quality
siftbotThis video has already declared quality - ignoring quality request by enoch.
Discuss...
Enable JavaScript to submit a comment.