I expected to see how all hats get blown of their heads... I'm disappointed.

At first I thought it would be something like the dancing squid video, you know this one http://videosift.com/video/The-dancing-squid-dish-from-Japan.

Ahh morals are a nice thing, I'm ok with the squid but disgusted with the frog.

I hope they don't include this into GTA V, would make the game so much harder...

I wan't to see this thing in a competition with these dudes.
http://videosift.com/video/Fast-Workers-Compilation

What the fuck that is the slimiest thing I ever saw.

*promote... Uhh right I can't do that.

On behalf of all non native english speakers here, WHAT?????

First of all, I like your standpoint, nothing wrong with that. We simply don't know, maybe the big bang was an imploding black hole in another plane of existence, creating our own 4 dimensional reality. Maybe it was an omnipotent being looking like a giant spider with Panda bears instead of arms, maybe both.
Although Occam razor would suggest the first alternative (which on a grand scale sounds equally ridiculous to me), we still don't know.

And secondly ask yourself this (I don't mean you in special bobknight), "Is it even possible to consider biological evolution in isolation from everything else?". I don't think thats possible, first we need something like really huge stars to create heavy atoms (i mean everything with more protons than helium, that's not what a chemist would call heavy). We need smaller stars that don't burn up that fast and deliver energy, we need a planet in the right distance to this star. Ohh and the planet itself doesn't have the properties to sustain life from the beginning, earth also had to "evolve" to the kind of planet that was able to sustain life and therefore start the biological evolution. There are many more of these requirements and they also needed to "evolve" from this huge pile of energy called the big bang.

So you finally made a profile, I'm so proud.

It's even better in german, believe me.

There was more tension in this video than in any Micheal Bay movie.

I think the problem is when a director gets so much credit as Nolan, the studios go against their normal habit and give the guy as much freedom and money as they can afford. I don't say that freedom of ones creativity is a bad thing in general. But I think it can produce a situation in which decisions of the director aren't questioned anymore, because who dares to question the almighty Christopher Nolan. They end up doing everything like one guy thinks is cool and we end up with something like Star Wars: Episode 1.

Although this sounds contradictionary, I think a good artist needs boundries for his work as much as he needs the freedom to express himself.

I always thought that crossbreds between Lions and Tigers cant procreate. The more you know...

My family does this to my dad all the time, giving him a gift that is just concealing the real gift, gets him everytime. The secret is, sometimes you gotta give him a really crappy present for real, so he doesn't get suspicious. The hardest part of Christmas for me is to find that one really crappy present my father would pretend to like but really doesn't...

Thanks for all the details dag, I'm interested to read the rest. And don't blame yourself about the hipocracy of selfpromoting videosift in the early days. Reddit did the same thing, in the beginning the founders had dozens of fake accounts to post Links and voting them up, not only to fill content but also to shape the kind of content that would be posted. And I'm quite sure if they never had done that, reddit wouldn't have become what it is.

To quote F.D.Roosevelt on this one "Rules are not necessarily sacred, principles are."